Zonealarm Suite has updated to 5 .0.590.043

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the disastrous
5.0.590.015 version.
I will let others try first and watch the user forum.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

mudfish wrote:

>Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the disastrous
>5.0.590.015 version.
>I will let others try first and watch the user forum.
>
>
>
>
whats wrong with this version. I haven't had any problems yet.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

Nobody wants to be first. I want to wait also.

DDDD

"mudfish" <fish@chips.com> wrote in message
news:cb78rj$5ce$1@news.tiscali.fr...
> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the disastrous
> 5.0.590.015 version.
> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.
>
>
 
S

Sam

Distinguished
Mar 30, 2004
866
0
18,980
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

Sometime on, or about Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:26:17 -0400, DDDD scribbled:

> Nobody wants to be first. I want to wait also.
>
> DDDD
>
> "mudfish" <fish@chips.com> wrote in message
> news:cb78rj$5ce$1@news.tiscali.fr...
>> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the disastrous
>> 5.0.590.015 version.
>> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.

I installed it. No problems... yet.

Sam
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

DDDD wrote:
> Nobody wants to be first. I want to wait also.
>
> DDDD
>
> "mudfish" <fish@chips.com> wrote in message
> news:cb78rj$5ce$1@news.tiscali.fr...
>> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the disastrous
>> 5.0.590.015 version.
>> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.
>>
>>
>
>
NAV 2004 under Win XP: It's working fine.

--
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

>NAV 2004 under Win XP: It's working fine.

Can you run CHKDSK with the "fix files errors" option checked (ie in
reboot)... this did not work in the prior version...

--


TO REPLY REMOVE THE "X" FROM MY DOMAIN NAME.

=____________________________-
////// (____) RKBA _____|
(/////___________________(_____|
Giovanni Lentini (/ /( )/o/)_/)_/)_/)_/)
(/ 0 /_\__))
gioX@rkba.net (/ /)
(/ /)
(/ 0 /)
(/____ /)
=======
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

Giovanni Lentini wrote:

>>NAV 2004 under Win XP: It's working fine.
>
> Can you run CHKDSK with the "fix files errors" option checked (ie in
> reboot)... this did not work in the prior version...
>
> --
>
>
> TO REPLY REMOVE THE "X" FROM MY DOMAIN NAME.
>
> =____________________________-
> ////// (____) RKBA _____|
> (/////___________________(_____|
> Giovanni Lentini (/ /( )/o/)_/)_/)_/)_/)
> (/ 0 /_\__))
> gioX@rkba.net (/ /)
> (/ /)
> (/ 0 /)
> (/____ /)
> =======
Ran NDD utility. Made sure Fix Errors was checked. Powered off.
Powered on and Chkdsk ran.

--

Alan
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

A.G. Kalman wrote:
> Giovanni Lentini wrote:
>
>>>NAV 2004 under Win XP: It's working fine.
>>
>> Can you run CHKDSK with the "fix files errors" option checked (ie in
>> reboot)... this did not work in the prior version...
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> TO REPLY REMOVE THE "X" FROM MY DOMAIN NAME.
>>
>> =____________________________-
>> ////// (____) RKBA _____|
>> (/////___________________(_____|
>> Giovanni Lentini (/ /( )/o/)_/)_/)_/)_/)
>> (/ 0 /_\__))
>> gioX@rkba.net (/ /)
>> (/ /)
>> (/ 0 /)
>> (/____ /)
>> =======
> Ran NDD utility. Made sure Fix Errors was checked. Powered off.
> Powered on and Chkdsk ran.
>
Forget what I said. NDD does not work properly!

--

Alan
 
U

user

Splendid
Dec 26, 2003
3,943
0
22,780
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

mudfish wrote:

> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the
> disastrous
> 5.0.590.015 version.
> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.

ZoneAlarm Pro 5.0.590.043 still makes my system freeze, just as the
prior build of ZAP 5.0 did.

What a surprise.

Thanks, Zone Labs. Do I get that half hour of my life back?
 
J

john

Splendid
Aug 25, 2003
3,819
0
22,780
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

· wrote:
> mudfish wrote:
>
>> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the
>> disastrous
>> 5.0.590.015 version.
>> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.
>
> ZoneAlarm Pro 5.0.590.043 still makes my system freeze, just as the
> prior build of ZAP 5.0 did.
>
> What a surprise.
>
> Thanks, Zone Labs. Do I get that half hour of my life back?

You need to fill out the rebate from for that :)
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

"·" <sdglockman@hotmail.com> squirted these wordjisms deep inside the
bumtube of the newstwat in
news:391Cc.112308$j24.84865@twister.nyroc.rr.com:

> mudfish wrote:
>
>> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the
>> disastrous
>> 5.0.590.015 version.
>> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.
>
> Well they say they "Fixed system stability issues". Zone Labs
> wouldn't ever lie or be wrong, would they? LOL.
>
> http://download.zonelabs.com/bin/free/information/zap/releaseHistory.ht
> ml#5.0.590.043
>
>


Surprisingly, its fixed my system stability issues. Previously took an age
for an Explorer window to open with the first v5 update, now it works ok.

So far ;)

--
*********************************
> David Qunt
>
****************************************************
 
S

Sam

Distinguished
Mar 30, 2004
866
0
18,980
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

Sometime on, or about Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:27:28 -0500, Giovanni
Lentini scribbled:

>>NAV 2004 under Win XP: It's working fine.
>
> Can you run CHKDSK with the "fix files errors" option checked (ie in
> reboot)... this did not work in the prior version...
>

I just tried to do the chkdsk /f process. Nothing happened. So I guess
I've been bit by this bug. I wonder what the difference is between
those machines that can run chkdsk and those that can't?

Sam
--
To mail me please get rid of the BS first
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

"Sam" <srs2_11BS@BShotmailBS.com> wrote in message
news:17yogjz56jek7$.1mbb0wqaftc2x.dlg@40tude.net...
> Sometime on, or about Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:27:28 -0500, Giovanni
> Lentini scribbled:
>
> >>NAV 2004 under Win XP: It's working fine.
> >
> > Can you run CHKDSK with the "fix files errors" option checked (ie in
> > reboot)... this did not work in the prior version...
> >
>
> I just tried to do the chkdsk /f process. Nothing happened. So I guess
> I've been bit by this bug. I wonder what the difference is between
> those machines that can run chkdsk and those that can't?
>
> Sam
> --
> To mail me please get rid of the BS first

I had that same problem. I ran chkdsk with the fix option
on and then rebooted. Nothing happened. Then I turned
the computer off and booted back up and then the
chkdsk started and did fine. Did you turn your off or did
you just reboot?

Bill
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom