Zonealarm Suite has updated to 5 .0.590.043

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

mudfish wrote:

>Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the disastrous
>5.0.590.015 version.
>I will let others try first and watch the user forum.
>
>
>
>
whats wrong with this version. I haven't had any problems yet.

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

Nobody wants to be first. I want to wait also.

DDDD

"mudfish" <fish@chips.com> wrote in message
news:cb78rj$5ce$1@news.tiscali.fr...
> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the disastrous
> 5.0.590.015 version.
> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.
>
>

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

Sometime on, or about Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:26:17 -0400, DDDD scribbled:

> Nobody wants to be first. I want to wait also.
>
> DDDD
>
> "mudfish" <fish@chips.com> wrote in message
> news:cb78rj$5ce$1@news.tiscali.fr...
>> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the disastrous
>> 5.0.590.015 version.
>> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.

I installed it. No problems... yet.

Sam

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

DDDD wrote:
> Nobody wants to be first. I want to wait also.
>
> DDDD
>
> "mudfish" <fish@chips.com> wrote in message
> news:cb78rj$5ce$1@news.tiscali.fr...
>> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the disastrous
>> 5.0.590.015 version.
>> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.
>>
>>
>
>
NAV 2004 under Win XP: It's working fine.

--

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

>NAV 2004 under Win XP: It's working fine.

Can you run CHKDSK with the "fix files errors" option checked (ie in
reboot)... this did not work in the prior version...

--


TO REPLY REMOVE THE "X" FROM MY DOMAIN NAME.

=____________________________-
////// (____) RKBA _____|
(/////___________________(_____|
Giovanni Lentini (/ /( )/o/)_/)_/)_/)_/)
(/ 0 /_\__))
gioX@rkba.net (/ /)
(/ /)
(/ 0 /)
(/____ /)
=======

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

Giovanni Lentini wrote:

>>NAV 2004 under Win XP: It's working fine.
>
> Can you run CHKDSK with the "fix files errors" option checked (ie in
> reboot)... this did not work in the prior version...
>
> --
>
>
> TO REPLY REMOVE THE "X" FROM MY DOMAIN NAME.
>
> =____________________________-
> ////// (____) RKBA _____|
> (/////___________________(_____|
> Giovanni Lentini (/ /( )/o/)_/)_/)_/)_/)
> (/ 0 /_\__))
> gioX@rkba.net (/ /)
> (/ /)
> (/ 0 /)
> (/____ /)
> =======
Ran NDD utility. Made sure Fix Errors was checked. Powered off.
Powered on and Chkdsk ran.

--

Alan

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

mudfish wrote:

> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the
> disastrous
> 5.0.590.015 version.
> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.

Well they say they "Fixed system stability issues". Zone Labs wouldn't
ever lie or be wrong, would they? LOL.

http://download.zonelabs.com/bin/free/information/zap/r...

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

A.G. Kalman wrote:
> Giovanni Lentini wrote:
>
>>>NAV 2004 under Win XP: It's working fine.
>>
>> Can you run CHKDSK with the "fix files errors" option checked (ie in
>> reboot)... this did not work in the prior version...
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> TO REPLY REMOVE THE "X" FROM MY DOMAIN NAME.
>>
>> =____________________________-
>> ////// (____) RKBA _____|
>> (/////___________________(_____|
>> Giovanni Lentini (/ /( )/o/)_/)_/)_/)_/)
>> (/ 0 /_\__))
>> gioX@rkba.net (/ /)
>> (/ /)
>> (/ 0 /)
>> (/____ /)
>> =======
> Ran NDD utility. Made sure Fix Errors was checked. Powered off.
> Powered on and Chkdsk ran.
>
Forget what I said. NDD does not work properly!

--

Alan

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

mudfish wrote:

> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the
> disastrous
> 5.0.590.015 version.
> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.

ZoneAlarm Pro 5.0.590.043 still makes my system freeze, just as the
prior build of ZAP 5.0 did.

What a surprise.

Thanks, Zone Labs. Do I get that half hour of my life back?

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

· wrote:
> mudfish wrote:
>
>> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the
>> disastrous
>> 5.0.590.015 version.
>> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.
>
> ZoneAlarm Pro 5.0.590.043 still makes my system freeze, just as the
> prior build of ZAP 5.0 did.
>
> What a surprise.
>
> Thanks, Zone Labs. Do I get that half hour of my life back?

You need to fill out the rebate from for that  

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

"·" <sdglockman@hotmail.com> squirted these wordjisms deep inside the
bumtube of the newstwat in
news:391Cc.112308$j24.84865@twister.nyroc.rr.com:

> mudfish wrote:
>
>> Have not tried it so do not know if it is an improvement on the
>> disastrous
>> 5.0.590.015 version.
>> I will let others try first and watch the user forum.
>
> Well they say they "Fixed system stability issues". Zone Labs
> wouldn't ever lie or be wrong, would they? LOL.
>
> http://download.zonelabs.com/bin/free/information/zap/r...
> ml#5.0.590.043
>
>


Surprisingly, its fixed my system stability issues. Previously took an age
for an Explorer window to open with the first v5 update, now it works ok.

So far  

--
*********************************
> David Qunt
>
****************************************************

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

Sometime on, or about Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:27:28 -0500, Giovanni
Lentini scribbled:

>>NAV 2004 under Win XP: It's working fine.
>
> Can you run CHKDSK with the "fix files errors" option checked (ie in
> reboot)... this did not work in the prior version...
>

I just tried to do the chkdsk /f process. Nothing happened. So I guess
I've been bit by this bug. I wonder what the difference is between
those machines that can run chkdsk and those that can't?

Sam
--
To mail me please get rid of the BS first

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

"Sam" <srs2_11BS@BShotmailBS.com> wrote in message
news:17yogjz56jek7$.1mbb0wqaftc2x.dlg@40tude.net...
> Sometime on, or about Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:27:28 -0500, Giovanni
> Lentini scribbled:
>
> >>NAV 2004 under Win XP: It's working fine.
> >
> > Can you run CHKDSK with the "fix files errors" option checked (ie in
> > reboot)... this did not work in the prior version...
> >
>
> I just tried to do the chkdsk /f process. Nothing happened. So I guess
> I've been bit by this bug. I wonder what the difference is between
> those machines that can run chkdsk and those that can't?
>
> Sam
> --
> To mail me please get rid of the BS first

I had that same problem. I ran chkdsk with the fix option
on and then rebooted. Nothing happened. Then I turned
the computer off and booted back up and then the
chkdsk started and did fine. Did you turn your off or did
you just reboot?

Bill