What's Transmeta like?

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

Hi

I'm showing my ignorance here but I wouldn't know what a Transmeta cpu is
like if I fell over one. Are they any good? Would I be better off just
looking at AMD or Intel?

Have fun

Peter Mount
info@petermount.au.com
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 12:53:16 +1000, "Peter Mount"
<info@petermount.au.com> wrote:

>I'm showing my ignorance here but I wouldn't know what a Transmeta cpu is
>like if I fell over one. Are they any good? Would I be better off just
>looking at AMD or Intel?

I don't think they are really anywhere close to current AMD or Intel
mainstram offerings for typical uses. For low wattage requirements
they might still be useful but I think the feeling is comparable power
consumption offerings from V/I/A are generally better performers...
not to mention easier to find boards for.


--
L.Angel: I'm looking for web design work.
If you need basic to med complexity webpages at affordable rates, email me :)
Standard HTML, SHTML, MySQL + PHP or ASP, Javascript.
If you really want, FrontPage & DreamWeaver too.
But keep in mind you pay extra bandwidth for their bloated code
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 12:53:16 +1000, "Peter Mount"
<info@petermount.au.com> wrote:
>I'm showing my ignorance here but I wouldn't know what a Transmeta cpu is
>like if I fell over one. Are they any good? Would I be better off just
>looking at AMD or Intel?

Transmeta is purely targeting the very low-power segment of x86 chips,
only for ultra-thin portables, tablet PCs, etc... and they aren't even
doing a very good job at that.

Their performance is no where near that of AMD or Intel chips. The
latest and greatest Transmeta Efficeon chips running at 1.0GHz will
give you about the performance of an old Pentium3 running at 500MHz (a
5+ year old chip these days). A few applications might be a bit
better, but some would also be a bit worse. The power consumption of
these chips is respectable, only about 7W maximum and often down
around 2W of power. For comparison, the top-end of Intel's P4 line
consumes ~100W maximum and about 60W during typical use, so you're
looking at better than an order of magnitude lower power consumption
for the Transmeta chips here, but the P4 really is not designed for
same market at all.

The chips that Transmeta really competes against are Intel's Ultra Low
Voltage Celeron and the VIA C3 processor. The ULV Celeron are the
fastest of the three but has slightly higher power consumption (~7W
max and 4W average, rough estimate). It's also fairly cheap. The VIA
C3 has about the same power consumption as the Transmeta chips,
slightly higher performance and VERY low cost (about 1/2 to 1/3 the
price of Transmeta of Intel's chips). Transmeta offers the lowest
performance and probably the highest price with little more than the
name and some marketing to back it up.


In short, there really is no good reason at all for anyone to ever
consider the Transmeta chips IMO. If you need a chip with the
performance and power characteristics of the Transmeta, the VIA C3
offers the same for a fraction of the cost. Otherwise Intel or AMD
produce MUCH faster chips for cheaper and with only slightly higher
power consumption.

-------------
Tony Hill
hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca
 

rush

Distinguished
Apr 4, 2004
214
0
18,680
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

"Peter Mount" <info@petermount.au.com> wrote :

> What's Transmeta like?

smells like a fish, tastes like a chicken ... or the other way around

Pozdrawiam.
--
RusH //
http://pulse.pdi.net/~rush/qv30/
Like ninjas, true hackers are shrouded in secrecy and mystery.
You may never know -- UNTIL IT'S TOO LATE.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

Peter Mount wrote:

> Hi
>
> I'm showing my ignorance here but I wouldn't know what a Transmeta cpu is
> like if I fell over one. Are they any good? Would I be better off just
> looking at AMD or Intel?
>
> Have fun
>

In late 2002 I used a laptop with a Transmeta cpu for about
6 weeks. It was just fine for things like word processing,
web browsing, e-mail, and playing music and videos.

It absolutely choked on things like video encoding, zipping up
large files or folders, or compiling anything bigger than "Hello
World".

Didn't try much else with it.

OS was W2K.

For typical office worker tasks it would be more
than adequate. Would be great for a home theatre
system. Possibly adequate for file/print server
types of jobs in a small business.