Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)
Is there a page somewhere that compares the different integrated audio
chipsets that many motherboards are now including?
I'm about to build a new PC with a microATX motherboard. Audio quality
is an important factor but I have a limited number of PCI slots so I'm
looking for something on-board.
How do these rate?
ADI AD1980
C-Media CMI9739A
Realtek ALC655
AC97 Codec
"Lauren the Ravishing" <lauren_the_ravishing@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117042654.521103.41560@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Is there a page somewhere that compares the different integrated audio
> chipsets that many motherboards are now including?
>
> I'm about to build a new PC with a microATX motherboard. Audio quality
> is an important factor but I have a limited number of PCI slots so I'm
> looking for something on-board.
>
> How do these rate?
>
> ADI AD1980
> C-Media CMI9739A
> Realtek ALC655
> AC97 Codec
>
> Are there ones that I should be looking for?
>
> Thank you for your time,
> ~Lauren
>
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)
On 25 May 2005 10:37:34 -0700, "Lauren the Ravishing"
<lauren_the_ravishing@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Is there a page somewhere that compares the different integrated audio
>chipsets that many motherboards are now including?
>
>I'm about to build a new PC with a microATX motherboard. Audio quality
>is an important factor but I have a limited number of PCI slots so I'm
>looking for something on-board.
>
>How do these rate?
>
>ADI AD1980
>C-Media CMI9739A
>Realtek ALC655
>AC97 Codec
>
>Are there ones that I should be looking for?
>
>Thank you for your time,
>~Lauren
I don't know about the other's so much but C-Media is pretty decent. I
have that on my Asus mb and used it for a while and had no issues and
the sound quality was ok. AC97 is just a standard and not a sound
chipset although some mb's list their mb as having AC97 for sound.
C-Media is also AC97. I think Realtek is supposed to be ok. My Abit
mb has Realtek ALC650 but I have never tried it out. The only onboard
sound solution that can match an add-on card like an Audigy2 is the
Soundstorm that came on mb's with the Nforce2 chipset. But I think all
onboard sound these days is fairly decent for music, mp3's, internet
radio etc. It's when you get into 3D audio in games that they may fall
a bit short. I prefer to use add-on cards myself and have Audigy2 on
one PC and Santa Cruz on the other. It all depends on what your PC
usage is. I'm a gamer and is why I use add-on cards.
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)
On Thu, 26 May 2005 12:26:28 -0700, Fisher <fisher@no_email.here>
wrote:
>I don't know about the other's so much but C-Media is pretty decent. I
>have that on my Asus mb and used it for a while and had no issues and
>the sound quality was ok. AC97 is just a standard and not a sound
>chipset although some mb's list their mb as having AC97 for sound.
>C-Media is also AC97. I think Realtek is supposed to be ok. My Abit
>mb has Realtek ALC650 but I have never tried it out.
Just to complicate things further, the chip is only one relatively
small part of the equation. I've got two systems, both with AC97
sound using C-Media CODECs. The first is an ASRock K7S41GX using a
CMI9739 chip. The second is a Chaintech 7NJL6 using a CMI7961A. The
difference in specs between these two chips is quite small, but the
difference in sound quality is very noticeable. The Chaintech board
has a much cleaner sound, sufficiently better that it's pretty obvious
with my only average-quality computer speakers.
Unfortunately audio is one of those tricky analog things where
subtleties in design can affect performance much more than
specifications.
> The only onboard
>sound solution that can match an add-on card like an Audigy2 is the
>Soundstorm that came on mb's with the Nforce2 chipset.
Virtually none of the nForce2 chipsets use the Soundstorm audio. My
above-mentioned Chaintech board certainly does not. Most of the
nForce1 boards used Soundstorm, but it was mostly dropped for the
nForce2.
> But I think all
>onboard sound these days is fairly decent for music, mp3's, internet
>radio etc. It's when you get into 3D audio in games that they may fall
>a bit short. I prefer to use add-on cards myself and have Audigy2 on
>one PC and Santa Cruz on the other. It all depends on what your PC
>usage is. I'm a gamer and is why I use add-on cards.
I find the integrated audio on my Chaintech board to be quite
sufficient for light-use, but I purchased a PCI sound card for the
ASRock board.
-------------
Tony Hill
hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)
On Thu, 26 May 2005 22:38:21 -0400, Tony Hill
<hilla_nospam_20@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>Virtually none of the nForce2 chipsets use the Soundstorm audio. My
>above-mentioned Chaintech board certainly does not. Most of the
>nForce1 boards used Soundstorm, but it was mostly dropped for the
>nForce2.
Here's a list showing all the motherboards that use Soundstorm. If I
was going for onboard sound and had AMD I would buy one of those but
of course not if I wanted an Nforce4 mb as none of those have it.
For the most powerful integrated audio solution available today, look
for NVIDIA nForce(TM) and NVIDIA nForce2 systems featuring NVIDIA
SoundStormâ„¢ audio.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.