Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > More Wacky Apple theories: Sun responsible

More Wacky Apple theories: Sun responsible

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - More Wacky Apple theories: Sun responsible

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!

Ask the community Add a reply

Bottom Search this thread

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

"Sun already got the AMD exclusive. Apple didn't want to go "me, too"
with Sun"
http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/2005/06/15.html#a64

So I guess in order to rebel against the system, Apple went with the
company that already has 80% of the market. :-)

Also I wasn't aware that Apple and Sun were on such non-speaking terms.
Until now, I didn't even think they were in the same market. :-)

Yousuf Khan

Add a reply

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips (More info?)

Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@ezrs.com> wrote:
> Also I wasn't aware that Apple and Sun were on such non-speaking terms.
> Until now, I didn't even think they were in the same market. :-)

Well, the XServe and some of Sun's lowest-end 1Us are probably direct
competitors...

--
Nate Edel http://www.cubiclehermit.com/

"This is not a humorous signature."

Reply to Anonymous

Ask the community Add a reply

Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > More Wacky Apple theories: Sun responsible

Go to:

Help |
Forum rules

There are 1180 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Page generated in 0.198 seconds

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel

Focus On

More Wacky Apple theories: Sun responsible

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - More Wacky Apple theories: Sun responsible

Please mind