New chip watercooling technology! Hope it's implemented fast

[rms]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

New chip cooling technology: this looks like a very simple mod for today's
waterblock manufacturers, hope we see it implemented fast:
URL:http://83.219.63.174/Articles/291380/Nozzle+nobbles+heat.htm

rms

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"rms" <rsquires@flashREMOVE.net> wrote in message
news:dFYAe.461$Dx6.73@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
> New chip cooling technology: this looks like a very simple mod for
> today's waterblock manufacturers, hope we see it implemented fast:
> URL:http://83.219.63.174/Articles/291380/Nozzle+nobbles+heat.htm

Since it's spraying directly on the chip, and the spray is moving towards a
"drain," it might not be so easy to adapt to our pc's.


--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at
spam@uce.gov
Thanks, robots.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

Since it's spraying directly on the chip, and the spray is
moving towards a
"drain," it might not be so easy to adapt to our pc's.

We don't know how fast these droplets are moving. They might be moving
so fast that gravity direction doesn't matter in the short distances
that it travels from source to drain.

Yousuf Khan

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"YKhan" <yjkhan@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1121216658.888944.202940@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>

Since it's spraying directly on the chip, and the spray is
> moving towards a
> "drain," it might not be so easy to adapt to our pc's.

>
> We don't know how fast these droplets are moving. They might be moving
> so fast that gravity direction doesn't matter in the short distances
> that it travels from source to drain.
>
> Yousuf Khan

Then as long as they got a good seal around the edges it would be ok. It
would take some very hi-temp rubber or something.


--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at
spam@uce.gov
Thanks, robots.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

Also I don't think they're using water in this case, it's some kind of
liquid "that is safe on electronic circuits".

 

[rms]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

> Also I don't think they're using water in this case, it's some kind of
> liquid "that is safe on electronic circuits".

Yes, probably Freon or somesuch that boils on contact. Still the basic
idea of jets that do not interfere with flow from adjacent jets is certainly
worth persuing in standard watercooling.

rms

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"rms" <rsquires@flashREMOVE.net> wrote in message
news:_RbBe.604$Gp1.422@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
>> Also I don't think they're using water in this case, it's some kind of
>> liquid "that is safe on electronic circuits".
>
> Yes, probably Freon or somesuch that boils on contact. Still the basic
> idea of jets that do not interfere with flow from adjacent jets is
> certainly worth persuing in standard watercooling.
>
> rms
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

"Ken Maltby" <kmaltby@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:Ua6dncF5rtjTFkvfRVn-oA@giganews.com...
>
> "rms" <rsquires@flashREMOVE.net> wrote in message
> news:_RbBe.604$Gp1.422@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
>>> Also I don't think they're using water in this case, it's some kind of
>>> liquid "that is safe on electronic circuits".
>>
>> Yes, probably Freon or somesuch that boils on contact. Still the
>> basic idea of jets that do not interfere with flow from adjacent jets is
>> certainly worth persuing in standard watercooling.
>>
>> rms
>>

OOPS, sorry;

The flow technique could be an improvement in water systems.
It would be interesting to see how it would compare to a diamond
pin setup. Another factor that could work in its favor, are the
CPU chips with integrated metal "heatspreaders".

One thing that struck me reading the article was how with the
right fluid wouldn't this improve the heatpipe approach? Sorta,
an active pumped heatpipe; a heatpipe with more power, <grunt>
<grunt>.

Luck;
Ken

 

[keith]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd (More info?)

On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:11:58 -0500, Ken Maltby wrote:

>
> "Ken Maltby" <kmaltby@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:Ua6dncF5rtjTFkvfRVn-oA@giganews.com...
>>
>> "rms" <rsquires@flashREMOVE.net> wrote in message
>> news:_RbBe.604$Gp1.422@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
>>>> Also I don't think they're using water in this case, it's some kind of
>>>> liquid "that is safe on electronic circuits".
>>>
>>> Yes, probably Freon or somesuch that boils on contact. Still the
>>> basic idea of jets that do not interfere with flow from adjacent jets is
>>> certainly worth persuing in standard watercooling.
>>>
>>> rms
>>>
>
> OOPS, sorry;
>
> The flow technique could be an improvement in water systems.

I doubt it.

> It would be interesting to see how it would compare to a diamond
> pin setup. Another factor that could work in its favor, are the
> CPU chips with integrated metal "heatspreaders".

Whether the "heat-spreader" is on the processor or on the heatsink only
matters as far as the thermal conductivity between the ship and said
spreader. The idea is to get the heat away from the chip, As Uncle
Felger says, "the first mile" is what matters.

> One thing that struck me reading the article was how with the
> right fluid wouldn't this improve the heatpipe approach? Sorta, an
> active pumped heatpipe; a heatpipe with more power, <grunt> <grunt>.

Why would it? ...and does it matter?

--
Keith