Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.intel (
More info?)
On 22 Sep 2005 05:05:25 -0700, "Rthoreau" <rthoreau@iwon.com> wrote:
>Ouch! I wonder how this effects Nvidia, and AMD it would seem that it
>would encourage their use; especially since VIA, SIS do not have chips
>on hand.
Could help them out, particularly in the short-term. Long-term is
much harder to predict.
>It also brings up another issue, is the smithfield core doing that
>good, or is demand for that chip so strong as to hamper supply. Maybe
>Dell is selling a lot of dual core chips now, and is taking up the
>supply.
It could be, though I haven't seen much indication that dual-core P4
chips are doing much better than any other new chip introduction. If
you look at Dell they don't even offer the Pentium D on most of their
systems. Only a handful of their newest systems (2 home systems, 1
office system and 1 workstation) offer the chip. The story with HPaq
is about the same, and in fact HP offers AMD's dual-core chips on just
as many systems as they do for Intel's dual-core chips.
I certainly don't have any hard numbers to back this up one way or
another, and I certainly don't think that the Pentium D is doing
particularly badly. However I do try and keep my ear to the ground on
this sort of thing, and I haven't seen anything that looks like a
shortage of Pentium D chips. It's also not like Intel could shift fab
space from the production of chipsets to the production of the Pentium
D given that they are produced on a different manufacturing process
(130nm or 180nm for chipsets, 90nm for processors).
-------------
Tony Hill
hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca