... it's at about 15 percent of the Web population that's paying for content right now--that's still a low number. Very soon, you'll see that the content that's left to be free is content that will not be trusted ...
This idea of paying to read/download articles (content) could ruin the internet - we already pay, indirectly, for content by way of inflated prices for goods and services that factor in advertising costs. If this is allowed to gain a footing (like the RIAA/Napster/P2P "situation" ) - the promise of a free internet could go the way of pay TV.
This is one idea that I hope the crackers totally screw up ...
<A HREF="http://rss.com.com/2008-1082_3-5057174.html?type=pt&part=rss&tag=feed&subj=news" target="_new">CNET link </A>
<b><font color=red>It depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is. - Bill Clinton<b><font color=red>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.