Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video (
More info?)
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:40:24 GMT, "mudz" <mudz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Ben Pope" <spam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:2jmat6Ft8tjaU1@uni-berlin.de...
>>
>> The mistake was not making it clear enough wht they did. I do also
>disagree
>> with the practice of calling them Pros, but I didn't realise that the
>boxes
>> had "128bit memory interface" written on them either. Not that that helps
>> the average consumer.
>>
>> > Their only mistake was in getting caught
>> > at it. True...they could have said screw you...they could also have been
>> > successfully sued.
>>
>> In which country? If the box says 128bit all over it, then they're hardly
>> lying.
>>
>> Ben
>
>It certainly IS lying. ATI has certain standards for a card to be named a
>9800 PRO. Sticking a tiny label on the box that says 128 bit does NOT then
>permit you to call a 9800 SE card a 9800 PRO card. And I would suggest that
>in the US of A a class action lawsuit would work very well...
>
>
>The problem is that the 128 bit was NOT written on every package. Putting
>that larger 128 bit label on forthcoming boxes is their supposed remedy for
>this situation. Here is the problem as I see it. To the average consumer 128
>bit does not mean much...after all that is double 64 bit and could be
>misconstrued as being an 'improvement'. What the average consumer DOES
>understand is 9800 PRO...*that* they can relate to, because that means
>something...they see it printed on retail boxed products, and they know that
>a pro is better than a plain 9800, and that a 9800SE is a lower grade than a
>9800. The specific card that I saw was an OEM product..absolutely NO mention
>of 128 bit interface anyplace...and it had the very same label as my genuine
>9800 PRO....a purchaser...and indeed the seller...had NO way to know this
>was a lesser card. *That* is fraudulent marketing...end of story...
>
>What Sapphire did is no different that a jeweller taking a one carat
>crystal...labeling it as a one carat diamond and selling it for thousands of
>dollars. It is still a piece of crystal and the purchaser HAS been
>cheated....this is soooooo simple.
>
>M
>
Depends what the crystal is. If it's a diamond, then what's the
problem? If it's a Sapphire, of course... ;-)
patrickp
patrickp@5acoustibop.co.uk - take five to email me