G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video (More info?)
My wife has been using a 17" (more like 16") CRT for years. She has
been complaining about eye strain recently so we went out and bought a
Viewsonic VP201S -- the 20" LCD monitor.
She feels that the LCD is even harder on her eyes than was the CRT. I
am wondering why this might be and what I can do about it.
There are several possible problems. I would appreciate comments.
1. We connected it using the analog port to a 3-year-old computer.
Maybe the video card is not up to the task of making this monitor look
as good as it is capable of looking. I do notice some funny colors in
the background -- like the video card can't quite keep up.
If this is (or might be) the problem. Should I get a new video card?
If so, which one?
2. The new resolution makes the screen images too small. I have it set
at its native 1600x1200. I tried a couple of other settings. She likes
the sizes better, but not the jagged effect.
If this is the problem, maybe I should return the 20" and get a 19".
Her old 16" CRT was set at 1024x768. With a viewing area of 12.6x9.5,
I believe that works out to 82x81 dpi. The 20" LCD runs at 1600x1200.
With a viewing area of 16.1 x 12.1, that's 99x99 dpi -- a 22%
increase. 19" LCDs running at 1280x1024 with a view space of 14.8x11.9
net out at 86x86 dpi. That's a lot closer to what she is used to.
3. It's just new and she will need time to get used to it. Has anyone
else had an initial dislike for LCDs and then gotten used to them?
4. This is not a quality product. Does anyone else have one?
Thanks
--
For email, use Usenet-20031220 at spamex.com
My wife has been using a 17" (more like 16") CRT for years. She has
been complaining about eye strain recently so we went out and bought a
Viewsonic VP201S -- the 20" LCD monitor.
She feels that the LCD is even harder on her eyes than was the CRT. I
am wondering why this might be and what I can do about it.
There are several possible problems. I would appreciate comments.
1. We connected it using the analog port to a 3-year-old computer.
Maybe the video card is not up to the task of making this monitor look
as good as it is capable of looking. I do notice some funny colors in
the background -- like the video card can't quite keep up.
If this is (or might be) the problem. Should I get a new video card?
If so, which one?
2. The new resolution makes the screen images too small. I have it set
at its native 1600x1200. I tried a couple of other settings. She likes
the sizes better, but not the jagged effect.
If this is the problem, maybe I should return the 20" and get a 19".
Her old 16" CRT was set at 1024x768. With a viewing area of 12.6x9.5,
I believe that works out to 82x81 dpi. The 20" LCD runs at 1600x1200.
With a viewing area of 16.1 x 12.1, that's 99x99 dpi -- a 22%
increase. 19" LCDs running at 1280x1024 with a view space of 14.8x11.9
net out at 86x86 dpi. That's a lot closer to what she is used to.
3. It's just new and she will need time to get used to it. Has anyone
else had an initial dislike for LCDs and then gotten used to them?
4. This is not a quality product. Does anyone else have one?
Thanks
--
For email, use Usenet-20031220 at spamex.com