Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)
Fidelio wrote:
> I got a HTTP server but I would like the user to access via HTTPS to a
> gateway server and redirect to HTTP real page.
Two questions:
Why? (Why not stay within https if you want security and if you want to
publish an unsecured page, why bother with https anyway?) I don't
understand what you are trying to achieve.
What has this got to do with firewalls?
--
------------------------------------
Real email to mike. The header email is a spam trap and you will be
blacklisted,
submitted to anti-spam sites and proably burn in hell.
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)
First your last question. What has this got to do with firewalls? Don't
know. Nowadays the firewalls integrate proxing services... may be because
that, but anyway if your concern is reading OT news postings just don't
answer.
What I want is to access our DMZ webmail system which is not working on
HTTPS so I want to do reverse proxy.
But anyway... don't loss your time answering this.
Fidelio
"Mike" <honey@michaelmoyse.co.uk> escribió en el mensaje
news:cee37l$6vo$1@thorium.cix.co.uk...
> Fidelio wrote:
>
> > I got a HTTP server but I would like the user to access via HTTPS to a
> > gateway server and redirect to HTTP real page.
>
> Two questions:
>
> Why? (Why not stay within https if you want security and if you want to
> publish an unsecured page, why bother with https anyway?) I don't
> understand what you are trying to achieve.
>
> What has this got to do with firewalls?
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Real email to mike. The header email is a spam trap and you will be
> blacklisted,
> submitted to anti-spam sites and proably burn in hell.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.