ATI 128MB ATI RADEON 9200 SE DDR V Geforce 3 Ti200 64mb

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

does anyone which out of this graphics cards is best ?

my old base unit has the geforce in it, and my new 1 comes with the ATI, if
my geforce is actually better i will just transfer it over.

cheers all

Smith

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

> i run my old geforce 3 ti200 in my server at 240 core 480 ram
>
> from 175 core 400 ram
>
> it geta about 10500 in 3dmark 2001

hay shonk, do you have any extra cooling on your GF3 ti200 ?

cheers mucker for the info on the ati too

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

use 3dmark 2001 its pretty good at picking up problems

2 much speed on the ram causes screen artifacts
watch for them

2 much speed on the core causes stuttering or hard lock if its way over

the cooling on the core is just standard heatsink and fan

remember ti200 cores are just standard ti 500 cores speed binned slower

ti500's run at 250 core

you can allmost guarantee it will run at 225 core for sure

i took about a week of testing to find the absolute highest 100% stable
speed
and then made a custom bios for my ti so it runs at that speed from turn on


if you work out your speed gime a shout and ill show u how to make a custom
bios for your ti

but make sure its good 100% not just good ish as your doing a perminent
overclock

mine is 240/480 and has been running that speed for the last 2 years with no
problems



"smith" <negativespam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:FuFcc.58$7p4.54@newsfe1-gui.server.ntli.net...
>
> > i run my old geforce 3 ti200 in my server at 240 core 480 ram
> >
> > from 175 core 400 ram
> >
> > it geta about 10500 in 3dmark 2001
>
> got it running @ 200 core 430 ram, just to test on Need for speed
> underground, see if there is any performance increase
>
>