Archived from groups: alt.games.grand-theft-auto (More info?)
um i dont know who ask this question but if u really think vice city graphics r better then san andreas u r NUTS dude
the texture is 100 times smoother the draw disteance id a 100 times better if u truely think that u r wrong get a better pc then u see the best GTA game ever in san andreas.
dont get me wrong vice city was good i loved it but its no san andreas, SA is the best in the series to date bar none.
Archived from groups: alt.games.grand-theft-auto (More info?)
<Ilikefreestuff@freestuff.com> wrote in message
news:gwDwe.101031$x96.37093@attbi_s72...
> um i dont know who ask this question but if u really think vice city
graphics r better then san andreas u r NUTS dude
> the texture is 100 times smoother the draw disteance id a 100 times better
if u truely think that u r wrong get a better pc then u see the best GTA
game ever in san andreas.
> dont get me wrong vice city was good i loved it but its no san andreas, SA
is the best in the series to date bar none.
Archived from groups: alt.games.grand-theft-auto (More info?)
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:57:40 -0400, "Margrave of Brandenburg"
<lhorwinkle@usa.com> wrote:
>If you like jaggies and moire, sure.
I presume you mean the PS2 version, PC's have FSAA and high
resolutions.
--
Andrew, contact via interpleb.blogspot.com
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
Archived from groups: alt.games.grand-theft-auto (More info?)
"Andrew" <spamtrap@localhost.> wrote in message
news:vc67c1dj8a8edc20ose9jfvdeucmsgpia5@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:57:40 -0400, "Margrave of Brandenburg"
> <lhorwinkle@usa.com> wrote:
>
>>If you like jaggies and moire, sure.
>
> I presume you mean the PS2 version, PC's have FSAA and high
> resolutions.
> --
> Andrew, contact via interpleb.blogspot.com
> Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
> please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
> Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
It depends on your PC's specs as well of course. I had SA running, but
looking a bit rubbish on my old graphics cars, so I shelled out for a new
one and now it looks great. If I bought a high-end graphics card, new
processor and loads of memory, it would doubtless look better still.
I suppose the PS2 advantage is that you just buy the game and you know it's
going to run as it was meant to. Us PC folk sometimes have to embark on a
bit of upgrading.
I wouldn't swap my PC for a PS2 in a million years, regardless.
Archived from groups: alt.games.grand-theft-auto (More info?)
Yes.. The PC version is beautiful..
I've seen the PS2 one, its hideous.
"Andrew" <spamtrap@localhost.> wrote in message
news:vc67c1dj8a8edc20ose9jfvdeucmsgpia5@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 22:57:40 -0400, "Margrave of Brandenburg"
> <lhorwinkle@usa.com> wrote:
>
>>If you like jaggies and moire, sure.
>
> I presume you mean the PS2 version, PC's have FSAA and high
> resolutions.
> --
> Andrew, contact via interpleb.blogspot.com
> Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
> please don't top post. Trim replies to quote only relevant text.
> Check groups.google.com before asking an obvious question.
It only happens on objects a long way away, and only in 16-bit colour
depth. 32-bit colour depth is too slow though, and in my opinion
doesn't actually look as good for some reason that I can't quite put my
finger on. I think everything looks like it's made of soft plastic.
I don't think any of these problems get in the way though.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.