Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (
More info?)
Daniel Crichton wrote:
> "Skybuck Flying" <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:c8cv6h$led$1@news2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl...
>>
>> "ec" <no@no.com> wrote in message
>> news:NYeqc.8914$65.8882@lakeread06...
>>>
>>> "Skybuck Flying" <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:c8ae0n$l2u$1@news4.tilbu1.nb.home.nl...
>>>> http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=NDc0LDI=
>>>>
>>>> What more is there to say =D
>>>>
>>>> I knew it all along
>>>>
>>>> Skybuck.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The 5200 isn't in
>>> those graphs numb nuts.
>>
>> Read the conclusion dumb nuts hehehehehehehe.
>
> It merely says that the test ran on the FX5200, that it didn't crash.
> So what? You can draw no conclusions as to how the game runs; will
> you be happy running at 1 FPS? (Note: 1 FPS is not a figure I have
> determined by any analytical method, it is merely a number I plucked
> out of my head to demonstrate that "not crashing" may not imply "runs
> acceptably"). Until the game is released and tests can be done by
> FX5200 owners on their own PCs you can't possibly say that you have a
> machine that you can play Doom3 on. And the alpha release doesn't
> count - much work has been done on the engine since then.
>
> Dan
I think you are forgetting that earlier in the week he was bragging about
pulling 3-5 fps and it being "great" or some drivel like that. I am sure
he would be happy playing Doom IV at 1 frame/ 2 minutes.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram