3dmark '03 FX5900 Ultra - please post your 3dmark scores h..

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar hardware.
I got 5627 with the following setup:

AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
Soltek KT400-C
MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
16 answers Last reply
More about 3dmark fx5900 ultra post 3dmark scores
  1. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    Mine is about the same

    Daniel

    "mimayin" <mimayin@gamebox.net> wrote in message
    news:ca4hgt$vn6$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...
    > Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar
    hardware.
    > I got 5627 with the following setup:
    >
    > AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
    > Soltek KT400-C
    > MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
    > 1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
    >
    >
    >
  2. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    "mimayin" <mimayin@gamebox.net> wrote in message
    news:ca4hgt$vn6$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...
    > Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar
    hardware.
    > I got 5627 with the following setup:
    >
    > AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
    > Soltek KT400-C
    > MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
    > 1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
    >
    >
    >

    Why not post your compare URL too?
  3. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    Athlon 64 FX51 @ 2.21 ghz
    MSI K8T Master2-FAR
    Albatron FX5900 Turbo @ 433/850
    1GB (2X512mb) Corsair registered DDR-SDRAM

    3dMark 03 = 5872


    On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 15:09:40 +0100, "mimayin" <mimayin@gamebox.net>
    wrote:

    >Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar hardware.
    >I got 5627 with the following setup:
    >
    >AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
    >Soltek KT400-C
    >MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
    >1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
    >
    >
  4. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1917528
    3dMark 2003 score: 6686
    FX-51 overclocked to 2.275 ghz
    MSI K8T800 Master 2-FAR
    GeForce 5950 ultra (301mhz/983mhz) driver version 53.03
    1 gig (2 x 512) Corsair TwinX DDR333

    "mimayin" <mimayin@gamebox.net> wrote in message
    news:ca4hgt$vn6$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...
    > Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar
    hardware.
    > I got 5627 with the following setup:
    >
    > AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
    > Soltek KT400-C
    > MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
    > 1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
    >
    >
    >
  5. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    I get 6097 with only a FX5800Ultra and a 533Mhz P4 2.8!!
    No overclocking!!
    I thought the FX5900 was supposed to be faster?

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2252154

    GigaByte GA-8IHXP P4 Titan
    Intel P4 2.8Ghz 533FSB
    512Mb PC1066 Rambus RDRAM
    Fujitsu 36Gb Ultra-160 SCSI
    DVD Rom
    CD-RW
    nVidia FX5800Ultra 128Mb
    WindowsXP Home
  6. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    v56k wrote:
    >
    > I get 6097 with only a FX5800Ultra and a 533Mhz P4 2.8!!
    > No overclocking!!
    > I thought the FX5900 was supposed to be faster?
    >
    > http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2252154
    >
    > GigaByte GA-8IHXP P4 Titan
    > Intel P4 2.8Ghz 533FSB
    > 512Mb PC1066 Rambus RDRAM
    > Fujitsu 36Gb Ultra-160 SCSI
    > DVD Rom
    > CD-RW
    > nVidia FX5800Ultra 128Mb
    > WindowsXP Home
    >

    And to add to the AGP 4x v 8x debate I only use 4x!!
  7. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    "mimayin" <mimayin@gamebox.net> wrote in message news:ca4hgt$vn6$1@news5.svr.pol.co.uk...
    > Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar hardware.
    > I got 5627 with the following setup:
    >
    > AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
    > Soltek KT400-C
    > MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
    > 1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
    >

    5912. I closed down all startup progs and non-microsoft services unrelated to nVidia.

    MSI FX5900U-VTD256
    P4 3Ghz (FSB 400Mhz)
    1GB Kingston HyperX (2x 512MB PC3500)

    Asus P4C800E-D

    Tony.
  8. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    "v56k" <v56k@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:Hzzxc.17103654$Id.2828503@news.easynews.com...
    > v56k wrote:
    > >
    > > I get 6097 with only a FX5800Ultra and a 533Mhz P4 2.8!!
    > > No overclocking!!
    > > I thought the FX5900 was supposed to be faster?
    > >
    > > http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2252154
    > >
    > > GigaByte GA-8IHXP P4 Titan
    > > Intel P4 2.8Ghz 533FSB
    > > 512Mb PC1066 Rambus RDRAM
    > > Fujitsu 36Gb Ultra-160 SCSI
    > > DVD Rom
    > > CD-RW
    > > nVidia FX5800Ultra 128Mb
    > > WindowsXP Home
    > >
    >
    > And to add to the AGP 4x v 8x debate I only use 4x!!

    thats some fill rate you have on that card!! 14969.2 vs 2578.1 on me 9700
    Pro. I got no where near that with my FX5900 either!
  9. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    I am looking at your 3dMark project and see high mhz for your video card.
    Does your video card run stock at 501mhz/999mhz?
    By the way, It makes sense for a 5800ultra to outperform a 5900 but who
    knows?
    And a 533FSB 2.8ghz P4 is no slouch! Well except compared to an FX51, hehe
    :)
    I wonder how much difference that 4x/8x AGP setting you mention makes? Why
    faster when set lower?


    "v56k" <v56k@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
    news:WIyxc.17100435$Id.2827578@news.easynews.com...
    >
    > I get 6097 with only a FX5800Ultra and a 533Mhz P4 2.8!!
    > No overclocking!!
    > I thought the FX5900 was supposed to be faster?
    >
    > http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=2252154
    >
    > GigaByte GA-8IHXP P4 Titan
    > Intel P4 2.8Ghz 533FSB
    > 512Mb PC1066 Rambus RDRAM
    > Fujitsu 36Gb Ultra-160 SCSI
    > DVD Rom
    > CD-RW
    > nVidia FX5800Ultra 128Mb
    > WindowsXP Home
    >
  10. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    Athlon XP3200+ @ 2.4 GHz, multiplier x 12
    Gigabyte GA-7NNXP
    Asus FX5900, bios flashed to 5950 Ultra @ 475 / 950
    512 MB Corsair DDR-400 RAM

    Vid - 1024x768x32, NVIDIA Driver ver. 6.1.1.2, benchmarks run at default
    settings.
    3DMark2001se - 16,339
    3DMark03 - 5,820
    AquaMark3 - 42,172 GFX 5,793 / CPU 7,744

    Wayne
  11. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    Intel 3.2Ghz
    gigabyte GA-8KNXP
    2gig ram
    PNY FX5900 Ultra
    all default settings in 3dMark 03 v330
    no tweaking

    6247

    "www.ttdown.com" <trynn@verizon.net> wrote in message
    news:kfmcc0d6ki1a8l025gn18bbe1v59nm8p2u@4ax.com...
    > Athlon 64 FX51 @ 2.21 ghz
    > MSI K8T Master2-FAR
    > Albatron FX5900 Turbo @ 433/850
    > 1GB (2X512mb) Corsair registered DDR-SDRAM
    >
    > 3dMark 03 = 5872
    >
    >
    > On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 15:09:40 +0100, "mimayin" <mimayin@gamebox.net>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar
    hardware.
    > >I got 5627 with the following setup:
    > >
    > >AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
    > >Soltek KT400-C
    > >MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
    > >1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
    > >
    > >
    >
  12. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    "Scotter" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
    news:sBJxc.2552$KL2.428@fe2.texas.rr.com...
    > I am looking at your 3dMark project and see high mhz for your video card.
    > Does your video card run stock at 501mhz/999mhz?
    > By the way, It makes sense for a 5800ultra to outperform a 5900 but who
    > knows?

    A 5800 Ultra should no be faster than a 5900 Ultra
  13. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    I believe it was 5800 ULTRA vs. plain 5900 [NOT ultra]

    "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@comcast.net> wrote in message
    news:AnMxc.9219$0y.4117@attbi_s03...
    >
    > "Scotter" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
    > news:sBJxc.2552$KL2.428@fe2.texas.rr.com...
    > > I am looking at your 3dMark project and see high mhz for your video
    card.
    > > Does your video card run stock at 501mhz/999mhz?
    > > By the way, It makes sense for a 5800ultra to outperform a 5900 but who
    > > knows?
    >
    > A 5800 Ultra should no be faster than a 5900 Ultra
    >
    >
  14. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    Scotter wrote:
    > I am looking at your 3dMark project and see high mhz for your video card.
    > Does your video card run stock at 501mhz/999mhz?
    This is standard speed for a 5800 Ultra in 3D Mode.

    > By the way, It makes sense for a 5800ultra to outperform a 5900 but who
    > knows?
    > And a 533FSB 2.8ghz P4 is no slouch! Well except compared to an FX51, hehe
    > :)
    Agreed but there are faster CPU's here that have slower scores.

    > I wonder how much difference that 4x/8x AGP setting you mention makes? Why
    > faster when set lower?
    Its not faster when set lower it;s just that my mobo only supports AGP
    4x - ie. I get this score with an AGP 4x mobo.
  15. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    "v56k" <v56k@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message news:oXTxc.6314713$iA2.722497@news.easynews.com...
    > Scotter wrote:
    > > I am looking at your 3dMark project and see high mhz for your video card.
    > > Does your video card run stock at 501mhz/999mhz?
    > This is standard speed for a 5800 Ultra in 3D Mode.
    >
    > > By the way, It makes sense for a 5800ultra to outperform a 5900 but who
    > > knows?
    > > And a 533FSB 2.8ghz P4 is no slouch! Well except compared to an FX51, hehe
    > > :)
    > Agreed but there are faster CPU's here that have slower scores.

    OK, so... by how much should I overclock my card to make it produce the same amount of heat and noise as a
    FX5800 Ultra?

    Tony.
  16. Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

    You may get far higher scores in v313, before Futuremark nullified some of
    the nVidia optimizations. However, according to the company, scores across
    all versions are comparable. :-)

    --
    "War is the continuation of politics by other means.
    It can therefore be said that politics is war without
    bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed."


    "Timothy Drouillard" <timdrouillard@comcast.net> wrote in message
    news:xJSdnQ_FQbAXI1rdRVn_iw@comcast.com...
    > Intel 3.2Ghz
    > gigabyte GA-8KNXP
    > 2gig ram
    > PNY FX5900 Ultra
    > all default settings in 3dMark 03 v330
    > no tweaking
    >
    > 6247
    >
    > "www.ttdown.com" <trynn@verizon.net> wrote in message
    > news:kfmcc0d6ki1a8l025gn18bbe1v59nm8p2u@4ax.com...
    > > Athlon 64 FX51 @ 2.21 ghz
    > > MSI K8T Master2-FAR
    > > Albatron FX5900 Turbo @ 433/850
    > > 1GB (2X512mb) Corsair registered DDR-SDRAM
    > >
    > > 3dMark 03 = 5872
    > >
    > >
    > > On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 15:09:40 +0100, "mimayin" <mimayin@gamebox.net>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > > >Hi, I would like to compare my 3dmarks to other users with similar
    > hardware.
    > > >I got 5627 with the following setup:
    > > >
    > > >AthlonXP 3000+ @2.25ghz (fsb overclocked to 340mhz)
    > > >Soltek KT400-C
    > > >MSI FX5900 Ultra 256mb @ stock speed
    > > >1GB (2x512mb) Corsair TwinX DDR333 memory
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    >
    >
Ask a new question

Read More

Nvidia Graphics