Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)
I doubt everyone has a 480+W power supply.
I doubt everyone has a 480+W power supply.
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)
"Humga" <Humga@no-spam.com> wrote in message
news:56CdnQmhqYnvJWvdRVn-hA@eclipse.net.uk...
> I doubt everyone has a 480+W power supply.
>
Not everyone will have high watt PSU.
If you PC setup demand it, you better have it.
CapFusion,...
"Humga" <Humga@no-spam.com> wrote in message
news:56CdnQmhqYnvJWvdRVn-hA@eclipse.net.uk...
> I doubt everyone has a 480+W power supply.
>
Not everyone will have high watt PSU.
If you PC setup demand it, you better have it.
CapFusion,...
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)
Humga wrote:
> I doubt everyone has a 480+W power supply.
>
>
It doesn't require it. The 2nd molex connector is optional at this
point. Mostly for overclocking or greater stability. It's there to
provide "clean" power. If you have a good 350w or 400 that actually
puts out what it's rated at, then you'll be just fine.
But if you're having troubles running an FX5600U or such with one lead
and 4 drives in your rig, then it might be time to think about a good
quality PSU upgrade. Not something particularly high watt rated (500,
etc), but something that can actuall produce a good clean 400/450w all
the time and not just at peaks.
Humga wrote:
> I doubt everyone has a 480+W power supply.
>
>
It doesn't require it. The 2nd molex connector is optional at this
point. Mostly for overclocking or greater stability. It's there to
provide "clean" power. If you have a good 350w or 400 that actually
puts out what it's rated at, then you'll be just fine.
But if you're having troubles running an FX5600U or such with one lead
and 4 drives in your rig, then it might be time to think about a good
quality PSU upgrade. Not something particularly high watt rated (500,
etc), but something that can actuall produce a good clean 400/450w all
the time and not just at peaks.
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)
"deimos" <deimos@localhost.net> wrote in message
news:2lo6laFe3linU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Humga wrote:
>
> > I doubt everyone has a 480+W power supply.
> >
> >
>
> It doesn't require it. The 2nd molex connector is optional at this
> point. Mostly for overclocking or greater stability. It's there to
> provide "clean" power. If you have a good 350w or 400 that actually
> puts out what it's rated at, then you'll be just fine.
>
> But if you're having troubles running an FX5600U or such with one lead
> and 4 drives in your rig, then it might be time to think about a good
> quality PSU upgrade. Not something particularly high watt rated (500,
> etc), but something that can actuall produce a good clean 400/450w all
> the time and not just at peaks.
I was thinking of getting a Radeon 9800 Pro instead... =)
"deimos" <deimos@localhost.net> wrote in message
news:2lo6laFe3linU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Humga wrote:
>
> > I doubt everyone has a 480+W power supply.
> >
> >
>
> It doesn't require it. The 2nd molex connector is optional at this
> point. Mostly for overclocking or greater stability. It's there to
> provide "clean" power. If you have a good 350w or 400 that actually
> puts out what it's rated at, then you'll be just fine.
>
> But if you're having troubles running an FX5600U or such with one lead
> and 4 drives in your rig, then it might be time to think about a good
> quality PSU upgrade. Not something particularly high watt rated (500,
> etc), but something that can actuall produce a good clean 400/450w all
> the time and not just at peaks.
I was thinking of getting a Radeon 9800 Pro instead... =)
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)
If you want to run this card without burning out your other components, you
do.
--
DaveW
"Humga" <Humga@no-spam.com> wrote in message
news:56CdnQmhqYnvJWvdRVn-hA@eclipse.net.uk...
> I doubt everyone has a 480+W power supply.
>
>
If you want to run this card without burning out your other components, you
do.
--
DaveW
"Humga" <Humga@no-spam.com> wrote in message
news:56CdnQmhqYnvJWvdRVn-hA@eclipse.net.uk...
> I doubt everyone has a 480+W power supply.
>
>
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)
I have a basic 420W psu and my 6800GT is rock solid at ultra speeds
cheers
I have a basic 420W psu and my 6800GT is rock solid at ultra speeds
cheers
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)
"Mark Jeffries" <fdsdf@fsdfsdf.com> wrote in message
news
G4Kc.27764$dk2.24685@fe18.usenetserver.com...
> I have a basic 420W psu and my 6800GT is rock solid at ultra speeds
>
> cheers
>
>
>
That sounds promising
"Mark Jeffries" <fdsdf@fsdfsdf.com> wrote in message
news
G4Kc.27764$dk2.24685@fe18.usenetserver.com...> I have a basic 420W psu and my 6800GT is rock solid at ultra speeds
>
> cheers
>
>
>
That sounds promising
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)
mine's 350 or 400 (I forget which) and my 6800GT runs perfectly at stock
speeds.
"Humga" <Humga@no-spam.com> wrote in message
news:BP6dnU6YxfHraWXd4p2dnA@eclipse.net.uk...
>
> "Mark Jeffries" <fdsdf@fsdfsdf.com> wrote in message
> newsG4Kc.27764$dk2.24685@fe18.usenetserver.com...
> > I have a basic 420W psu and my 6800GT is rock solid at ultra speeds
> >
> > cheers
> >
> >
> >
>
> That sounds promising
>
>
mine's 350 or 400 (I forget which) and my 6800GT runs perfectly at stock
speeds.
"Humga" <Humga@no-spam.com> wrote in message
news:BP6dnU6YxfHraWXd4p2dnA@eclipse.net.uk...
>
> "Mark Jeffries" <fdsdf@fsdfsdf.com> wrote in message
> news
G4Kc.27764$dk2.24685@fe18.usenetserver.com...> > I have a basic 420W psu and my 6800GT is rock solid at ultra speeds
> >
> > cheers
> >
> >
> >
>
> That sounds promising
>
>
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)
"+c0re-" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:a9GdnbliqM6aqGTd4p2dnA@eclipse.net.uk...
> mine's 350 or 400 (I forget which) and my 6800GT runs perfectly at stock
> speeds.
>
Can you guys run UT2004 at maximum settings; at 1280x1024 resolution or
higher; with not less than 75 FPS?
"+c0re-" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:a9GdnbliqM6aqGTd4p2dnA@eclipse.net.uk...
> mine's 350 or 400 (I forget which) and my 6800GT runs perfectly at stock
> speeds.
>
Can you guys run UT2004 at maximum settings; at 1280x1024 resolution or
higher; with not less than 75 FPS?
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)
Yes, for the most part.
With everything maxed including physics, and sound options, My average
framerate sits between 80 and 140fps, occasionally it drops a little lower.
This is at 1280 x 1024.
"Humga" <Humga@no-spam.com> wrote in message
news:I6-dnWQDj9rD_GTdRVn-hA@eclipse.net.uk...
>
> "+c0re-" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:a9GdnbliqM6aqGTd4p2dnA@eclipse.net.uk...
> > mine's 350 or 400 (I forget which) and my 6800GT runs perfectly at stock
> > speeds.
> >
>
> Can you guys run UT2004 at maximum settings; at 1280x1024 resolution or
> higher; with not less than 75 FPS?
>
>
Yes, for the most part.
With everything maxed including physics, and sound options, My average
framerate sits between 80 and 140fps, occasionally it drops a little lower.
This is at 1280 x 1024.
"Humga" <Humga@no-spam.com> wrote in message
news:I6-dnWQDj9rD_GTdRVn-hA@eclipse.net.uk...
>
> "+c0re-" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:a9GdnbliqM6aqGTd4p2dnA@eclipse.net.uk...
> > mine's 350 or 400 (I forget which) and my 6800GT runs perfectly at stock
> > speeds.
> >
>
> Can you guys run UT2004 at maximum settings; at 1280x1024 resolution or
> higher; with not less than 75 FPS?
>
>
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)
"+c0re-" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:LYednfXUHem2WmTdRVn-ug@eclipse.net.uk...
> Yes, for the most part.
> With everything maxed including physics, and sound options, My average
> framerate sits between 80 and 140fps, occasionally it drops a little
lower.
> This is at 1280 x 1024.
>
>
oh my god! :O
"+c0re-" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:LYednfXUHem2WmTdRVn-ug@eclipse.net.uk...
> Yes, for the most part.
> With everything maxed including physics, and sound options, My average
> framerate sits between 80 and 140fps, occasionally it drops a little
lower.
> This is at 1280 x 1024.
>
>
oh my god! :O
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)
I'm by no means a hardcore unreal player, I just tested it on a random map
using the "quick action" setting. If there's a specific map you'd like me to
check just let me know, I only have the demo version though.
"Humga" <Humga@no-spam.com> wrote in message
news:dsOdnS8656-v8WfdRVn-hA@eclipse.net.uk...
>
> "+c0re-" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:LYednfXUHem2WmTdRVn-ug@eclipse.net.uk...
> > Yes, for the most part.
> > With everything maxed including physics, and sound options, My average
> > framerate sits between 80 and 140fps, occasionally it drops a little
> lower.
> > This is at 1280 x 1024.
> >
> >
>
> oh my god! :O
>
>
I'm by no means a hardcore unreal player, I just tested it on a random map
using the "quick action" setting. If there's a specific map you'd like me to
check just let me know, I only have the demo version though.
"Humga" <Humga@no-spam.com> wrote in message
news:dsOdnS8656-v8WfdRVn-hA@eclipse.net.uk...
>
> "+c0re-" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:LYednfXUHem2WmTdRVn-ug@eclipse.net.uk...
> > Yes, for the most part.
> > With everything maxed including physics, and sound options, My average
> > framerate sits between 80 and 140fps, occasionally it drops a little
> lower.
> > This is at 1280 x 1024.
> >
> >
>
> oh my god! :O
>
>
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram