256MB DDR NVIDIA GeForceFX(TM) 5500 or..

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

I'm building a Pc on Hp's web site, and have choice between a 256MB DDR
NVIDIA GeForceFX 5500 or 256MB DDR ATI Radeon 9800. I know the 9800 is most
likely a better card, but the price difference is $120, There is a 128MB
DDR 5200XT for $ 60 less the then 5500. But I'm not sure if I should stick
the Money into more memory ( would have 512 now)
or keep it in my pocket for a better later.
Thanks
Erik

 

[augustus]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

"asylum" <asylum@pconline.com> wrote in message
news:v%AQc.1983$mL5.853@news02.roc.ny...
> I'm building a Pc on Hp's web site, and have choice between a 256MB DDR
> NVIDIA GeForceFX 5500 or 256MB DDR ATI Radeon 9800. I know the 9800 is
most
> likely a better card, but the price difference is $120, There is a 128MB
> DDR 5200XT for $ 60 less the then 5500. But I'm not sure if I should
stick
> the Money into more memory ( would have 512 now)
> or keep it in my pocket for a better later.
> Thanks


The FX5500 and the standard 128bit FX5200 are clocked identically.....and
they're both slugs. Thing GeForce2 GTS level of performance with AGP8X and
DX9 support. 250Mhz core and 200Mhz DDR on both cards. They have identical
bandwidth.
http://users.erols.com/chare/video.htm
The FX5200 that's $60 less is likely a 64bit version, which has half the
bandwidth of the 128bit 5200 and 5500. A 9800 Pro is the same level as a
5900 Ultra. You get what you pay for. Both of these have 400% more bandwidth
than the cards you're looking at. If all you're doing is productivity or web
browsing, go with the cheap, slow and nasty. Any newer 3D gaming at all,
minimum you should be looking at is a 5700 Ultra or 9600XT.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Go to your local computer store and build your own pc
"Augustus" <augustus@wrtt.net> wrote in message
newsABQc.28394$yT2.22622@clgrps13...
>
> "asylum" <asylum@pconline.com> wrote in message
> news:v%AQc.1983$mL5.853@news02.roc.ny...
> > I'm building a Pc on Hp's web site, and have choice between a 256MB DDR
> > NVIDIA GeForceFX 5500 or 256MB DDR ATI Radeon 9800. I know the 9800 is
> most
> > likely a better card, but the price difference is $120, There is a
128MB
> > DDR 5200XT for $ 60 less the then 5500. But I'm not sure if I should
> stick
> > the Money into more memory ( would have 512 now)
> > or keep it in my pocket for a better later.
> > Thanks
>
>
> The FX5500 and the standard 128bit FX5200 are clocked identically.....and
> they're both slugs. Thing GeForce2 GTS level of performance with AGP8X and
> DX9 support. 250Mhz core and 200Mhz DDR on both cards. They have
identical
> bandwidth.
> http://users.erols.com/chare/video.htm
> The FX5200 that's $60 less is likely a 64bit version, which has half the
> bandwidth of the 128bit 5200 and 5500. A 9800 Pro is the same level as a
> 5900 Ultra. You get what you pay for. Both of these have 400% more
bandwidth
> than the cards you're looking at. If all you're doing is productivity or
web
> browsing, go with the cheap, slow and nasty. Any newer 3D gaming at all,
> minimum you should be looking at is a 5700 Ultra or 9600XT.
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

"Augustus" <augustus@wrtt.net> wrote in message
newsABQc.28394$yT2.22622@clgrps13...

" The FX5200 that's $60 less is likely a 64bit version, which has half the
bandwidth of the 128bit 5200 and 5500. A 9800 Pro is the same level as a
5900 Ultra. "


....but I suspect the 9800 Pro is the 128bit version.

 

[augustus]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

"Cuzman" <cuzNOSPAM@supanet.com> wrote in message
news:2ngbtgFkannU1@uni-berlin.de...
> "Augustus" <augustus@wrtt.net> wrote in message
> newsABQc.28394$yT2.22622@clgrps13...
>
> " The FX5200 that's $60 less is likely a 64bit version, which has half
the
> bandwidth of the 128bit 5200 and 5500. A 9800 Pro is the same level as a
> 5900 Ultra. "
>
>
> ...but I suspect the 9800 Pro is the 128bit version.

Probably not... 9800 Pros of late are all 256bit....it was only the very
first released ones that Sapphire had that were in a 9800 Pro box with a
128bit sticker on. None of the 128bit 9800's are labeled as Pro's now.
They're just called 9800 Atlantis. He also says it costs $120 more than the
256 MbFX5500 which go for $90 to $100....the 128bit 9800's don't go for
$200-220, they're in the $165-170 range.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 01:18:19 GMT, "asylum" <asylum@pconline.com>
wrote:

>I'm building a Pc on Hp's web site, and have choice between a 256MB DDR
>NVIDIA GeForceFX 5500 or 256MB DDR ATI Radeon 9800. I know the 9800 is most
>likely a better card, but the price difference is $120, There is a 128MB
>DDR 5200XT for $ 60 less the then 5500. But I'm not sure if I should stick
>the Money into more memory ( would have 512 now)
>or keep it in my pocket for a better later.
>Thanks
>Erik
>


Build your own... save money by getting the parts you need....

Like a client who ordered a Celeon Dell - when he could have gotten an
AMD setup for the same price with more memory.



- - - - -
Remember: In the USA - it is dangeroud to draw or write about Heir Bush in a negative way. The police or SS are called, people threaten to kill you. (What country is this again?)

- Fahrenheit 9/11 - Unless you see it for yourself, don't call it "a bunch of lies"... that would be unAmerican.
- White House blows cover of an undercover agent because her husband said there were no WMD (before the USA started the war) - her job was finding terrorist.
God bless the land of the free. Where you can burn the Constitution... Ashcroft does it every day.