Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (
More info?)
"byru" <mbyrczek@poczta.wp.pl> wrote in message
news:2ouio7Fevh50U1@uni-berlin.de...
>
> "Nicolai" <emailxyznifo@fogh.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> news:412a146f$0$184$edfadb0f@dtext02.news.tele.dk...
> > > can you ghive me some statistics and comparison of this two cards. I
> have
> > > heard that Ultra is only a few percent faster. is that right?
> > Yes.
> >
> > > I wait for ssome links, but if u have one of this two cards, please,
say
> > > what u think, what are the results in new games (doom 3, fracry).
> > Save the 100$ and get the GT - same card, clocken slightly slower.
> >
> yes, that is what i have heard already, but maybe u know some pages that
can
> proove that
>
> Byru
Its the same *architecture*. But to say its the same card is a little
misleading. First of all the Ultra has a different power supply arrangement
to get more current to the GPU to maintain the higher clock speeds. It has
twin molex connectors and more "beefy" voltage regulation circuitry. It
provides 1.4v to the GPU (as opposed to 1.3v on the GT) and since this
generates more heat, it has a larger and more powerful heatsink/fan. And it
also uses 1.6ns memory instead of the 2.0ns memory found on the GT's.
Having said all that, a GT clocked at the same speed as an Ultra will run at
the same speed. They are the smae architecture and in that respect, the 2
cards are "the same".
If you want benchmarks, 5 seconds with google will provide you with all the
details you want.
Chip