Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)
Hi,
Using sunscreen, can I be able to block ARP broadcasts also on SUN
solaris machine? When an IP address is plumbed on the SUN machine, I
dont want the ARP broadcast to be sent. Any ideas?
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)
In article <1126018790.903500.108880@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
Saju <sajugo@lucent.com> wrote:
:Using sunscreen, can I be able to block ARP broadcasts also on SUN
:solaris machine? When an IP address is plumbed on the SUN machine, I
ont want the ARP broadcast to be sent. Any ideas?
To check: you do not want the SUN to -answer- ARP broadcasts,
or you do not want the SUN to -send- ARP broadcasts?
Either way, in order to be able to communicate with the machines
that you want it to be able to communicate with, you would have
to enter static ARP entries for all of the other machines.
If you are going to do that, then perhaps null-routing all other
addresses would work for you?
--
Entropy is the logarithm of probability -- Boltzmann
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)
>> To check: you do not want the SUN to -answer- ARP broadcasts,
>> or you do not want the SUN to -send- ARP broadcasts?
SUN should not be able to send ARP broadcasts.
And, I will not be able to add static ARP entries in all the machines
in the same subnet for access control reasons.
Also, even if I null-route all other addresses, ARP broadcasts will
reach the other machines. ARP broadcast when I plumb an IP address on
my solaris machine do reach the other solaris machines on the same
subnet (even when I have null-routing for this subnet).
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)
Saju <sajugo@lucent.com> wrote:
> >> To check: you do not want the SUN to -answer- ARP broadcasts,
> >> or you do not want the SUN to -send- ARP broadcasts?
> SUN should not be able to send ARP broadcasts.
> And, I will not be able to add static ARP entries in all the machines
> in the same subnet for access control reasons.
If there is no ARP and no static ARP, then there will be no communication
with IP.
Yours,
VB.
--
"Es kann nicht sein, dass die Frustrierten in Rom bestimmen, was in
deutschen Schlafzimmern passiert".
Harald Schmidt zum "Weltjugendtag"
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)
>If there is no ARP and no static ARP, then there will be no communication with IP.
Actually that is my intend. For some point of time, I want this
particular solaris machine to be isolated (without taking out this
machine physically). During this time, I will be doing some operations
on this machine and that should not interfere with the outside world.
Example:
I have SUN solaris machines A (X.Y.Z.A), B (X.Y.Z.B) and C (X.Y.Z.C) in
the same subnet. machine B has the IP X.Y.Z.D (logical interface) also
plumbed on it.
Now, I want machine A to be isolated for sometime. I will apply
Sunscreen to A so that it wont interact with either B or C. But, during
this time I need to plumb the same IP X.Y.Z.D (which is already on B)
on machine A also. During this time, ARP broadcast should not go out so
that machine C updates its ARP cache with MAC of A.
After the desired time, I will unplumb the IP X.Y.Z.D on B and remove
the Sunscreen policies; Now, for the ARP caches to be updated with the
MAC of A for IP X.Y.Z.D, I will DOWN and UP the corresponding interface
on machine A using ifconfig.
Thats basically about it.
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)
Saju <sajugo@lucent.com> wrote:
> >If there is no ARP and no static ARP, then there will be no communication with IP.
> Actually that is my intend. For some point of time, I want this
> particular solaris machine to be isolated (without taking out this
> machine physically).
Why not just shutting down the ethernet interface with ifconfig?
Yours,
VB.
--
"Es kann nicht sein, dass die Frustrierten in Rom bestimmen, was in
deutschen Schlafzimmern passiert".
Harald Schmidt zum "Weltjugendtag"
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)
Saju <sajugo@lucent.com> wrote:
> Some application need to come up on this machine A which will use this
> IP.
Why not setting up a virtual interface with this IP then?
Yours,
VB.
--
"Es kann nicht sein, dass die Frustrierten in Rom bestimmen, was in
deutschen Schlafzimmern passiert".
Harald Schmidt zum "Weltjugendtag"
Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)
I think what I will do disable ARP for the physical interface using
ifconfig command.
Thanks for all the suggestions.
Volker Birk wrote:
> Saju <sajugo@lucent.com> wrote:
> > Some application need to come up on this machine A which will use this
> > IP.
>
> Why not setting up a virtual interface with this IP then?
>
> Yours,
> VB.
> --
> "Es kann nicht sein, dass die Frustrierten in Rom bestimmen, was in
> deutschen Schlafzimmern passiert".
> Harald Schmidt zum "Weltjugendtag"
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.