3D Mark 05 Scores

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Anyone tried 3D Mark 05 yet?

I got a whopping 588 with the following setup, LOL

AMD Athlon 2600+, ASUS A7N8X-E Deluxe, 512MB PC3200 RAM, ASUS Geforce FX5700
128MB
Nvidia Mobo driver 5.10, Graphics driver 61.77, nothing overclocked.

Yikes! Roll on the AGP 6600's I say...

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

"rms" <rsquires@flashREMOVE.net> wrote in message
news:mNV8d.4336$5b1.1223@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
>> I got a whopping 588 with the following setup, LOL
>> AMD Athlon 2600+, ASUS A7N8X-E Deluxe, 512MB PC3200 RAM, ASUS Geforce
>> FX5700
>
> 5256 here
> http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=88318
>
> rms

I wondered who would be first to rise the bait.

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

FX-51 system with FX5950 Ultra 256 (nothing overclocked)

Got a score around 1600.

Feeling kinda sad about that.

Buddy of mine with a Pentium IV 2.8ghz (overclocked to 3.0 I believe) and a
BFG FX6800GT OC (overclocked from 350 to 370 out of the box) got a score
around 4500

I just ordered the card he has

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

960x720@32 bit is your resolution in this test, better go for 1024x768 32bit
if you are gonna compare.

"FatDaddy" <KillinU@worm.com> wrote in message
news:69ydnSCEpYN_oPncRVn-oA@comcast.com...
> http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=107535
>
>
> 5506 no tweaks just standard test
>

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Yup! Gotta love how as far as PC technology goes, no matter what you buy, it
will be obsolete quicker than you can replenish the crazy amount of money
you spent buying it, heh.

"Predator" <predator.this@predator.that> wrote in message
news:gcadnRXL3JZm_fncRVn-gw@giganews.com...
> nice. it will be obsolete in 6 months
>
> "Scotter" <spam@spam.com> wrote in message
> news:zeY8d.341$iC4.3@fe2.texas.rr.com...
>> FX-51 system with FX5950 Ultra 256 (nothing overclocked)
>>
>> Got a score around 1600.
>>
>> Feeling kinda sad about that.
>>
>> Buddy of mine with a Pentium IV 2.8ghz (overclocked to 3.0 I believe) and
>> a BFG FX6800GT OC (overclocked from 350 to 370 out of the box) got a
>> score around 4500
>>
>> I just ordered the card he has
>>
>>
>
>

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Also his fsb speed is overclocked.


"Runar" <runarhalvorsen@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2sj61dF1mgkhvU1@uni-berlin.de...
> 960x720@32 bit is your resolution in this test, better go for 1024x768
> 32bit if you are gonna compare.
>
> "FatDaddy" <KillinU@worm.com> wrote in message
> news:69ydnSCEpYN_oPncRVn-oA@comcast.com...
>> http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=107535
>>
>>
>> 5506 no tweaks just standard test
>>
>
>

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

4850 with a GT@Ultra and a P4 2.6ghz :-) (use 66.81 drivers)

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Yeap, you can say it worthless as of 05 but I see value to it. 3DMark05 will
indicate how much your card can handle those 3D intensive calculation. Then
make your own standard level to set for every PC being built in the future
or in the planing. The result PC should or will be expected to perform well
when come to heavy 3D base application or game. But as for end-user, it very
disappoint to see the card you own hit under 1000 and other can get higher
[matter of speaking as an example]. This also can be use as in burn-in test
for PC prior to release. You can also take notice how much heat being
generated for certain card being use or planing to use on that PC so this in
turn set what type of cooling will be use.

CapFusion,....



"GTX_SlotCar" <deroy@maine.rr.com> wrote in message
news:2sjlg9F1l696lU1@uni-berlin.de...
>> I wondered who would be first to rise the bait.
> I think we've already been here.
>
> 5422 for me:
> http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=81822
>
> I see no reason why they were compelled to release 05. It's the most
> worthless one of the bunch.
>
> Gary
>
>
> --
>
> Tweaks & Reviews
> www.slottweak.com
>
>
>