Omega Drivers

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

Are they worth using for the GF4 TI4200?

Using the newer nVidia drivers (66.93) at the minute, bringing in about 1462
on 3dMark03.

Would I expect better performance from either an older driver or the Omegas?

Cheers

--
-----

Cookie McCrumble

cookiemccrumble"at"hotmail"dot"com
www.whateverhappenedtomysocks.co.uk

I like pie

Winamp: Signal Terminated.

 

[raj]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

you answered your own question! try out both driver omega and nvidia and get
back to us you lazy bastard jsut try them lol.
"Cookie McCrumble" <cookiemccrumble@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:30jbgiF3050giU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Are they worth using for the GF4 TI4200?
>
> Using the newer nVidia drivers (66.93) at the minute, bringing in about
> 1462
> on 3dMark03.
>
> Would I expect better performance from either an older driver or the
> Omegas?
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> -----
>
> Cookie McCrumble
>
> cookiemccrumble"at"hotmail"dot"com
> www.whateverhappenedtomysocks.co.uk
>
> I like pie
>
> Winamp: Signal Terminated.
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

You would need to use a newer driver I would think but remember that
3DMark05 is testing DX9 and the 4200 is not a DX9 card so will always
perform poorly.

"Cookie McCrumble" <cookiemccrumble@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:30jbgiF3050giU1@uni-berlin.de...
> Are they worth using for the GF4 TI4200?
>
> Using the newer nVidia drivers (66.93) at the minute, bringing in about
> 1462
> on 3dMark03.
>
> Would I expect better performance from either an older driver or the
> Omegas?
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> -----
>
> Cookie McCrumble
>
> cookiemccrumble"at"hotmail"dot"com
> www.whateverhappenedtomysocks.co.uk
>
> I like pie
>
> Winamp: Signal Terminated.
>
>