Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (
More info?)
using a FX5200 64 MB , runs NOLF2 and CoD just fine. I was very
surprised. The 5200 got a bad rap, but really it's not too bad a GPU for
the money. I don't plan on trying Far Cry or any such newer games with
it, but for direct x 8 games and below it is fine. Some question whether
it truly supports DX 9, I have no reason to doubt it does.
Peter Perros wrote:
> Your motherboard likely only supports 4x AGP. The GF4 4000 wasn't a
> bad card, it superseded the GF4 MX-440. The FX5200 is a low-end card,
> not suitable for games. I'd suggest you look at a card with at least
> 128 meg DDR Ram and one that supports Direct X 9.0c. The cartds you
> mention are fine for playing DVD's and kids games. For real 3D with
> high frame rates you need to go to a more expensive card, but I fear
> the motherboard is a big limiting factor in what you can achieve.
>
> Cheers, Peter
>
>
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:56:00 GMT, "onthefrontline"
> <dontuwish@itsamind.thg> wrote:
>
>
>>I want to buy either a fx440, 4000, or 5200. All are 8Xagp and all are 128
>>mb. All are about $43. What is the difference? Which should I buy?
>>I am using a 600 pentium 3.
>>
>>
>
>