this is true but you must ask which one is gayer, cable. which one is shared, cable. which one is unreliable, cable. which one can be as fast as 56k sometimes, cable. which one requires constant frustration, cable.
Not in England. DSL sucks the sweat off a dead mans balls compared to cable.
<font color=blue>"Some people believe football is a matter of life and death. I'm very disappointed with that attitude. I can assure you it is much, much more important than that" - Bill Shankly</font color=blue>
It depends on your area. I'm on a 3-5 Mbit cable line right now, but I never get more than 2.5 Mbit, and I'm usually at around 1.5 Mbit.
DSL here is available in a few options. You can get the cheap 1.5 Mbit which is good for 1.5 Mbit assured, or you can get the expensive 2.5 Mbit assured one.
All companies are different, cable varies greatly as well.
Some day I'll be rich and famous for inventing a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
I have cable and am happy with it. A friend of mine had DSL and he was happy with it. As long as you don't go crazy downloading mass files while gaming online you should be good either way. That being said, my friend with DSL never ran into any of the problems I had where the cable company was getting subscribers faster than it was updating and having too many people sucking up bandwith and slowing things to a crawl. It's been like 6 months since that last happened and my 1.5 connection serves my needs well.
It's like saying what is faster? Diesel or Petrol?
Depends on the engine it's in...
DSL can run at all sorts of speeds...so can cable. As far as I know, I can get 4000/256 cable here. I can get an 8192/768 leased DSL line. or a 4096/4096 line instead.
Right now I'm on a cable connection, DSL has just become available in my area, I haven't found out yet if its capped and if it is, what are the limits? It appears from everything thats been posted that looking for the bandwidth limits is a good reference line for making the decision to switch or not, the DSL is cheaper than the cable in my area, so thats an attractive draw towards it but I want better than what I've got not worse, the main negative of cable I've found is when everyone in my neighborhood seems to be on line, speeds can seriously drop to a crawl, does that happen with DSL? If bandwith is comparable then a shared connection versus a direct line to the distribution point seems like the better option, but is it?
<b><font color=purple>Details, Details, Its all in the Details, If you need help, Don't leave out the Details.</font color=purple></b>
Je bent de meest onverschillige hasj dealende hoer die ik ooit heb ontmoet.
<b><font color=green>hagedis</font color=green></b>,<b><font color=green>hagedis</font color=green></b>
Svol heeft een reusachtige worst
My cable is absolutely awesome. In the last year since I've had it, it's gone down a total of 1 time for 5 minutes. I have a 1.5 mbit connection, and it never drops below 1.3 or 1.4 mbit, which is pretty damn good. I have been extremely satisfied with my service.
Unfortunately, I do live too far away from the phone switch to get DSL, so I can't do a comparison. But, whatever you get, cable or DSL, it's BETTER THAN 56k!!!
-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>
I've had two different dsl providers. This one might be ok but the modem sucks so I only get about 50kb/sec. It's pretty bad. Plus it's MSN/Microsoft.
In San Diego I lived right by SBC so I got about 4 times that with SBC Yahoo DSL. I also had a decent modem. Nonetheless, my neighbor got faster speeds with the same DSL which really pissed me off.
I'll go Cable next time though. From everything I've seen it's faster even at peak hours. Unfortionately it's also way more expensive here.
_________________________________________
<A HREF="http://skulls.sytes.net/tom/" target="_new">12 bit... The way games are meant to be played!</A>
In San Diego I lived right by SBC so I got about 4 times that with SBC Yahoo DSL. I also had a decent modem. Nonetheless, my neighbor got faster speeds with the same DSL which really pissed me off.
I wonder why your neighbor got faster speeds? Were you both using the same modem, and paying for the same limits?
<b><font color=purple>Details, Details, Its all in the Details, If you need help, Don't leave out the Details.</font color=purple></b>
My cable is absolutely awesome. In the last year since I've had it, it's gone down a total of 1 time for 5 minutes. I have a 1.5 mbit connection, and it never drops below 1.3 or 1.4 mbit, which is pretty damn good. I have been extremely satisfied with my service.
Cable performance definitely depends on the neighborhood you live in, if your main branch connection is shared by multiple users, (in my case possibly 105, I live in a mobile home park) then performance seriously drops as more people come online and start using the internet. Then you have to account for all the people thats run their own wiring, which creates noise on the lines, which is detrimental to computer communication, which our cable company is out where I live everyday trying to rectify, but its a big job to straighten out. From what you've written you've got dream cable in my book, if I was getting what you are, I wouldn't be considering this move to DSL.
Quote :
But, whatever you get, cable or DSL, it's BETTER THAN 56k!!!
Oh yes!!! how true, I hate to have to go work on someones internet problems and they have a dial up connection, takes forever just to get connected, and if you have to restart the machine a few times, its multiplied.
<b><font color=purple>Details, Details, Its all in the Details, If you need help, Don't leave out the Details.</font color=purple></b>
well thats good because its actually available where i live
kinda mental really isn't it, the entire city has had a LAN connection installed by a company years ago. this means that every building in the city center was wired together, and currently the max is 100Mbit, in the suburbs you can either get 10Mbit or 2Mbit.
but hey a LOT and i mean a LOT of people move to apartments in the city to get 100Mbit, i think its kinda funny because people flock to the fast internet zones
My only guess is that there was a lot of wire in a rats nest somewhere between our apartments. Throttling might have been an issue? Crappy wire on my end?
Either way I got 1.2 or so Mbps and he got above 1.6Mpps. I didn't even get 128kbps and he was way above it.
Same service.
_________________________________________
<A HREF="http://skulls.sytes.net/tom/" target="_new">12 bit... The way games are meant to be played!</A>
<b><font color=red>Well guys, I'm going to find out which is faster, the first month of DSL is free
so I'm getting it, and installing it on my machine, I'm temporarily leaving the cable on
my wifes machine and testing the download speeds from the same source, and see
which is faster. For all those interested I'll be posting what I discover.</font color=red></b>
<b><font color=purple>Details, Details, Its all in the Details, If you need help, Don't leave out the Details.</font color=purple></b><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by 4ryan6 on 09/19/03 02:16 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
Are you sure you don't have to sign a 6 or 12 month contract to get that free month? Usually because the cable or DSL providers don't charge for the modem, they make you sign a contract that makes you pay like $150 if you cancel before the 12 months is up. That's how my cable is, and how my freinds DSL was. Look into it.
-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>
Good point they didn't say anything about that at all, but it really doesn't matter, our intentions were to switch to DSL as soon as it was available in our area, the cable company we have Time/Warner sucks a big one, because of what they called noise on the lines, every weekend for a solid month at the first of this year internet service was down, with glitches since then and download speeds constantly getting worse, so I've had it with them and can't wait to take them back their modem and tell them to cancel the service. My main questions here were to find out if we were going to get less speed than we have now, really just to prepare ourselves for either the good or the bad.
<b><font color=purple>Details, Details, Its all in the Details, If you need help, Don't leave out the Details.</font color=purple></b>
Depends on your area. Cable runs in a 4 KM loop. Everyone on that loop shares the bandwidth, plus there's an upper limit cap on maximum individual bandwidth. Your performance depends on how many people are in that loop.
DSL isn't shared like cable. In theory that means that you'll always connect at the same speed. If you connect at 1.5 MBps the firt time you use it that means you'll always connect at 1.5 MBps. Unlike cable the time of day and the number of people sharing don't matter.
DSL connection speed depends on the distance you are from the CO (which is what that call the switching board). You have to be within 4.5 KM, and the closer you are the faster your connection.
In my area (Ottawa) I've had both. Speedwise they were comparable, DSL being faster during peak hours and cable during off-peak. I preferred cable because it was a better company. The DSL connection was down for 3 days once for an "unschedualled maintenance window" and then they put a bad dslam card in when I first signed up, so for the first week I had nothing. Plus it was just annoying to have to start up the connection every time I restarted the computer. Cable was always on.
Also cable didn't reset it's IP as fast as DSL, so it was easier to connect to my home PC from work with cable that it was for DSL.
--------------
Knowan likes you. Knowan is your friend.
DSL connection speed depends on the distance you are from the CO (which is what that call the switching board). You have to be within 4.5 KM, and the closer you are the faster your connection.
I'm less than .5 from the CO.
Quote :
Plus it was just annoying to have to start up the connection every time I restarted the computer. Cable was always on.
Start up the connection? Do you mean the same as the way you access dialup? I thought DSL was always on like cable is.
Quote :
Also cable didn't reset it's IP as fast as DSL, so it was easier to connect to my home PC from work with cable that it was for DSL.
We have the option to get a static IP, but if we took that option it would cost us way more than cable, could you elaborate on this?
<b><font color=purple>Details, Details, Its all in the Details, If you need help, Don't leave out the Details.</font color=purple></b>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.