Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Nvidia » Recommend 'best band for buck' videocard
 

Recommend 'best band for buck' videocard

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Recommend 'best band for buck' videocard
 
Chicken or the Egg? Hydrogen.
Profile: member
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

 

Hi group

Can someone recommend a 'best band for buck' videocard.
I have a 8x AGP slot.

Cheers
Sharp

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

 

"Sharp" <Sharp@SharpAddress.com> wrote in message
news:yH26e.6008$5F3.3240@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Hi group
>
> Can someone recommend a 'best band for buck' videocard.
> I have a 8x AGP slot.
>
> Cheers
> Sharp
>
Can I humbly suggest that no-one here will help you. Try
alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati

Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

 

Investigate a Geforce 6600gt. Or similar priced ATI variant.

Chicken or the Egg? Hydrogen.
Profile: member
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

 

"Carl" <me@theworld.universe> wrote in message
news:d3ahir$39e$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
> Investigate a Geforce 6600gt. Or similar priced ATI variant.


Is the Geforce 6600 (non-GT) faster than the Radeon 9600Pro?

Cheers
Sharp

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

 

"Sharp" <Sharp@SharpAddress.com> wrote in message
news:c266e.6256$5F3.942@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Carl" <me@theworld.universe> wrote in message
> news:d3ahir$39e$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
>> Investigate a Geforce 6600gt. Or similar priced ATI variant.
>
>
> Is the Geforce 6600 (non-GT) faster than the Radeon 9600Pro?

yes

>
> Cheers
> Sharp
>
>
>
>

Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

 

"Sharp" <Sharp@SharpAddress.com> wrote in message
news:c266e.6256$5F3.942@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Carl" <me@theworld.universe> wrote in message
> news:d3ahir$39e$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
>> Investigate a Geforce 6600gt. Or similar priced ATI variant.
>
>
> Is the Geforce 6600 (non-GT) faster than the Radeon 9600Pro?

Yes.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

 

Sometimes the "best bang for the buck" isn't a big enough bang. The 256mb
6800GT costs a lots less than a 6800 ultra or ultra extreme and gets nearly
all of the performance possible today from a single card. Specifically the
BFG 6800GT OC is probably the best choice here with a slight (20MHz) higher
clock rate, dual cooling fans, and only one slot used. I also find it nice
and quiet in its current model. The original version had the radial type
fan. The new one has two axial fans.

With a 1600x1200 TFT, I can play all of my games at 1600x1200 with good
performance. Of course if you have a 14" monitor at 800x600 or something,
then a lesser card would perform adequately for you. You need to look more
at your expectations of performance rather than just at value/dollar.


"Sharp" <Sharp@SharpAddress.com> wrote in message
news:yH26e.6008$5F3.3240@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Hi group
>
> Can someone recommend a 'best band for buck' videocard.
> I have a 8x AGP slot.
>
> Cheers
> Sharp
>
>

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

 

You might find this worth a look:

http://www.extremetech.com/article [...] 533,00.asp

"3D Graphics Price-Performance Shootout"

The 6600GT looks like a good choice, although it's not cheap (>$175 US at
Newegg).

Address scrambled. Replace nkbob with bobkn.

"Sharp" <Sharp@SharpAddress.com> wrote in message
news:yH26e.6008$5F3.3240@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Hi group
>
> Can someone recommend a 'best band for buck' videocard.
> I have a 8x AGP slot.
>
> Cheers
> Sharp
>
>

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

 

"Bob Knowlden" <nkbob@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:H82dndPuAuxXMMTfRVn-hw@comcast.com...
> You might find this worth a look:
>
> http://www.extremetech.com/article [...] 533,00.asp
>
> "3D Graphics Price-Performance Shootout"
>
> The 6600GT looks like a good choice, although it's not cheap (>$175 US at
> Newegg).
>


Thanks for posting that article. I have a 9800 Pro in my main computer, and
while I'm not looking to replace it anytime soon, I wanted to see how it
stacked up against some of the newer offerings using the same test bed.
This article was a very good read.

Chicken or the Egg? Hydrogen.
Profile: member
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (More info?)

 

> Thanks for posting that article. I have a 9800 Pro in my main computer,
and
> while I'm not looking to replace it anytime soon, I wanted to see how it
> stacked up against some of the newer offerings using the same test bed.
> This article was a very good read.

Been doing some reading, and the best bang for buck card are in the
following order:

[Australian dollars]
1. 6600GT 128MB AGP~$300
2. 6600 256MB AGP $220 / PCI-e $180

Annoys me that the PCI-E is $40 cheaper than AGP!
Going for second best - significantly cheaper!

Cheers
Sharp


Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Nvidia » Recommend 'best band for buck' videocard
 

Google Ads
Ad