Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (
More info?)
"Looker007" <Looker007@peek-a-boo.org> wrote in message
news:vDr9e.17035$Ln.791684@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> McGrandpa wrote:
>> "Looker007" <Looker007@peek-a-boo.org> wrote in message
>> news:alk9e.16952$Ln.785129@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca
>>
>>>McGrandpa wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Looker007" <Looker007@peek-a-boo.org> wrote in message
>>>>news:hPV8e.16360$Ln.752725@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>rms wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>I've been seeing sporadic but fairly frequent crashes or reboots
>>>>>>while playing CSS and other games, and after changing my AGP
>>>>>>Aperture on this 6800GT from 256 or 128 to 64meg, the crashes have
>>>>>>disappeared. This is on a NF7-Sv2 mobo, so perhaps this doesn't
>>>>>>hold for all
>>>>>>systems, but check your Aperture size if you are seeing any
>>>>>>crashes. rms
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>This an ATi group, your OFF TOPIC. Stop cross posting.
>>>>>
>>>>>Anyone who disagrees then this group should be A.C.P.V only.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It's a public unmoderated Usenet newsgroup.
>>>>
>>>>Posting was relevant. Get over it.
>>>>McG.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Glad you think so. Ever read about NETIQUETTE, and Usenet courtesy?
>>>
>>>I'll post some ATi stuff on the NVIDIA newsgroup and see how long
>>>before I get flamed...
>>>And, oh yea it'll be as relevant as this thread.
>>>
>>>Ever wonder why we have A.C.P.V.Nvidia and A.C.P.V.Ati? If all video
>>>card camps can post here what's the point of having separate
>>>newsgroups? Re-read my post.
>>>
>>>--Looker007
>>
>>
>> If you read the AGP aperture thread on both ati and nvidia ng's, what's
>> the problem? That thread would be applicable to both brands.
> Wrong the question is for a SPECIFIC brand of video card, an NVIDIA
> product.
> He didn't ask: "Whats the favourable aperature setting for a vid card"; He
> asked: "What is the ideal
> aperture setting for an Nvidia 6800GT vid card... Hmmmm, don't think it's
> an ATi card,
> yep I'm in the right newsgroup.
> The question would have been better placed on A.C. P.MAINBOARD, don't you
> agree?
>>
>> People do speak "ATI" on the nvidia ng, and the reverse. Most of the die
>> hard fanbois have been replaced by people who use cards from both
>> manufacturers. So really, don't go looking for a flaming for that
I
>> read both ng's daily myself as I have both brands of card running in my
>> systems right now.
> The poster only says a Nvidia 6800GT is in use.
>> McG. <netiquette used>
> I've used both and am with ATi at this point in time.
> I wasn't aware my TRUE statement was a flame. I didn't tell the author of
> the
> post where to shove it nor did I call the poster a troll or type any "off
> the cuff" reply.
> My reply was/is 100% on topic for THIS newsgroup.
>
>
>>
Looker007,
it may be my ignorance, but I completely fail to see the reason why you
said he was getting off topic.
it was clearly a person who was trying to help by telling us about his
specific example where his gf3 had weird issues and that he could not
replicate the issues with the ati9800 he replaced the GF3 with. However,
being that you know about Netiquette i would assume that you know how forums
work, especially unmoderated ones. With that being said i think the person
truely off topic would be you. when you posted that message i'm sure you
knew you were going to start a flame war. my question is why? with an
unmoderated group, why was it your responsibility to point out someone who
mentioned another product? these ati and nvidia forums were designed to keep
the main topic relevant to each company, but who is to say that they can't
have common issues or problems? and if so, why can't we talk about both
here? it's not like ati and nvida are trying to kill each other, why should
we then? i own both nvida and ati cards in my house and i know that both
cards have their place.