Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia (
More info?)
I think he meant the card was 4x and not the board but I could be wrong?
I was running a Inno 3d TI4200 at 8x agp and I replaced it recently with a
4x version of the same card made by asus
It benchmarks faster than the 8x card!!!!
"Arthur Hagen" <art@broomstick.com> wrote in message
news:d78ohn$fom$1@cauldron.broomstick.com...
> Gordon <notnow@no.com> wrote:
> > I have a geforce 4 ti4200 running in a 4xagp slot. Would it be worth
> > it to get a better card for my gaming? What would anyone reccomend.
> > Does it matter thatit's only 4x?
>
> There's very little difference between AGP 4x, 8x or PCIe 8x 16x for that
> matter. What matters more is that with a 4x AGP slot, you probably[1]
have
> an older motherboard with slower RAM and slower CPU too. That's more
likely
> to cause a bottleneck that won't let you take full advantage of the newest
> video cards.
>
> Unless you have at least a Pentium M 1.6, Northwood 2.53, Prescott 3.0 or
> Athlon 2800+, I think the CPU would be the bottleneck, and a 6600 would do
> almost as good as a 6800.
>
> Anyhow, don't worry too much about the 4x or 8x -- some people with 8x
> boards run them at 4x and overclock the PCI/AGP bus a little instead (like
> to 35/70 instead of 33/66), and get better results from that.
>
> [1]: The exception being the Asus P4T533 (not -C) which uses 32-bit
> RIMM4200 RDRAM, which can be overclocked quite far from the already fast
> (and expensive) speed.
>
> Regards,
> --
> *Art
>