Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,alt.games.microsoft.flight-sim (
More info?)
I have the same problem with Nvidia drivers, the later the version of the
drivers, the worser my frame rates get so anyone knowes which is the best
driver for nvidia cards, I have a V9570TD card from asus with a 5700 chipset
on it and 256 megs of Ram.
greetings
Henny
"JAD" <jdemma25@eartink.net> schreef in bericht
news:4Majc.3387$g31.509@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> You obviously do not have a clue as of what OP is talking about?
> > With image quality he (and almost all people) mean things like
> mip-map
> > levels, tex. filtering quality and so on.. Like using some drivers
> make some
> > textures look washed and blurred.
>
>
>
> oh really so your saying that somewhere there is a image of what
> the perfect screen should look like, and ALL will be in agreement?..
> right! ok whatever. where is there a reference to mip-maps in the
> original post?
>
> Is it my imagination or with each new Cat. drivers is the FS2004
> > > image quality decreasing?
>
> He asking from his imagination, is he seeing degradation, yep that's a
> 'in depth question that would definitely send me on a tangent of
> 100,000 $ word descriptions on the adjustments of video cards.
>
> O Poster, do you know what a mip map level is? how about texture
> filtering(which I mentioned)? Do you even care? it seems that FPS are
> the main concern while maintaining 'image quality' ? He simply asked
> about 'best image quality" at the end. and what driver versions, which
> is hardly a 'Vidphile' question.
>
> This is not a put down to the O Poster, so don't take it that way, if
> you are really into the intricacies of video card adjustments.
>
>
> I tried the game on my Mobility Radeon 9000 64mb, P4 2.53Ghz, 512
> PC2100
> > laptop few months back, and It played ok at 1024*768 setting with
> med-high
> > settings.
> > I think I was using catalyst 3.10 or 3.9 back then. Fps were in
> 25-40
> > ranges.
>
>
>
> Then you come back with a laptop reference, which is a far cry from
> what a desktop user will experience, no matter what the driver
> version.
>
> Yeah your right, your the only one that has the answers. ego better
> now?
>
>
> "Asestar" <a s e s t a r @ s t a r t . n o> wrote in message
> news:XL6jc.80811$BD3.9637452@juliett.dax.net...
> > >
> > >
> > Also there is an option in game to limit the framerate, disable it,
> or move
> > it to 60. i think it defaults to 22 or somthing.
> >
> > "JAD" <jdemma25@eartink.net> wrote in message
> > news:J2Yic.2524$g31.702@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> > > this will be dependent on your personal feeling of what is a
> 'good'
> > > image is. AA / AF settings along with refresh rates and type of
> > > monitor are the most noticeable and frequently adjusted settings.
> They
> > > change just about with every game. When you upgrade any driver
> (well
> > > most anyway) the settings may revert back to defaults and so you
> would
> > > have to take note of your prior settings and check to see if they
> are
> > > remaining the same. This is really a personal 'feeling' rather
> than a
> > > definite 'set them this way and you'll be happy' kind of thing. In
> XP
> > > refresh rates are a constant problem. make sure that you are using
> the
> > > 'INF' file (driver) for your monitor. No 'default monitor' on a
> ATI
> > > adapter description in display properties.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Dean H. Owens" <dean@owenses.net> wrote in message
> > > news:1YUic.20730$cF6.849542@attbi_s04...
> > > > I have an ATI 9700 Pro with Cat 4.4 drivers running on a Win XP
> Pro
> > > P4
> > > > 3.0GHz with 1GB RAM. I get 20FPS with every setting maxed.
> > > >
> > > > Is it my imagination or with each new Cat. drivers is the FS2004
> > > image
> > > > quality decreasing?
> > > >
> > > > Can anybody tell me the best CAT. driver, Cat. driver settings,
> and
> > > FS2004
> > > > settings combination to get the best image quality?
> > > >
> > > > Thx,
> > > >
> > > > Dean
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>