3Dmark2001SE

G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

I just learned about the benchmark program, 3DMark2001SE and downloaded the
free version .
(I'm sure most people on this newsgroupare aware of it).

My rating was 8537, is this good, bad or average?

Intel MB D865PERL
2.4 Ghz P4
1 Gb DDR 400 Mhz RAM
DirectX 9
ATI AIM 9000 Pro

Ed.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

not bad, considering you have a shite motherboard
 

Jimmy

Distinguished
Apr 3, 2004
322
0
18,780
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

ARRRRGGHHH you can smell the shite from here... ewwww


"atwifa" <atwifa@'fsmail'.net> wrote in message
news:ezydnddZCp89VQvdSa8jmw@karoo.co.uk...
> not bad, considering you have a shite motherboard
>
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

What is so wrong with this Intel motherboard? So far it has been rock solid
as opposed to my other two noname motherboard systems. This PC is not setup as a high end
garphics or game system but a general purpose PC with the additional ability
to capture video from analog sources. It works fine for me.
Again this is not intended to be a gaming system.

"Jimmy" <samnjimmy@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:bBClc.44453$fw.31775@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
> ARRRRGGHHH you can smell the shite from here... ewwww
>
>
> "atwifa" <atwifa@'fsmail'.net> wrote in message
> news:ezydnddZCp89VQvdSa8jmw@karoo.co.uk...
> > not bad, considering you have a shite motherboard
> >
> >
>
>
 

augustus

Distinguished
Feb 27, 2003
740
0
18,980
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

>
> My rating was 8537, is this good, bad or average?
>
> Intel MB D865PERL
> 2.4 Ghz P4
> 1 Gb DDR 400 Mhz RAM
> DirectX 9
> ATI AIM 9000 Pro

For a 9000 Pro it's not bad. Even with a P4 3.2 you won't be getting much
over 9500 or so. My 8500 128Mb gets 11,800 with a Barton at 2.200Ghz. The
main difference is that the 9000 and 9200's can only process one texture per
cycle, whereas the 8500 / 9100 family can do 2 per pass.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

trouble with intel boards is that they do what is says on the box .... but
that's it. nothing else. they're not configurable/adjustable *at all*