Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Norton 360 3.0 or Kaspersky Antivirus 2010? Which would you recommend?

Last response: in Windows 7
Share
October 24, 2009 1:55:51 PM

Norton 360 3.0 or Kaspersky Antivirus 2010? Which would you recommend?
October 24, 2009 5:13:30 PM

I second Kapersky
m
0
l
Related resources
Can't find your answer ? Ask !
a c 215 $ Windows 7
October 24, 2009 6:00:53 PM

Of these 2 options I would say Kaspersky, but if you're open to other options, I would look at VIPRE Antivirus from Sunbelt Software, and Comodo for your firewall.
m
0
l
a b è Antivirus
a c 401 $ Windows 7
October 24, 2009 6:02:08 PM

kaspersky then vipre!
m
0
l
October 24, 2009 6:11:24 PM

If you're intent on buying Kaspersky. Norton is a bit of a resource hog, in my experience.
m
0
l
October 24, 2009 7:53:00 PM

my version of kaspersky expired today... im gonna install win 7 today run it as a limited user and use Microsoft security essentials its free and it works great. I'm runing it on my laptop... but if your not an advanced user I would go with kaspersky or spy sweeper w/ anti virus or nod 32 they all work great!
m
0
l
a b è Antivirus
a c 401 $ Windows 7
October 24, 2009 10:23:11 PM

the new norton is very low on resources but i still prefer kaspersky!
m
0
l
a c 215 $ Windows 7
October 24, 2009 10:36:12 PM

SR-71 Blackbird said:
the new norton is very low on resources but i still prefer kaspersky!


This is true, but I still don't see the point of Norton 360 even existing. It's essentially a duplication of other Norton products which do the same thing, all in a different package.
m
0
l
a b $ Windows 7
October 24, 2009 10:39:18 PM

Another vote for Kapersky of the two.

Though I suggest checking out Nod32 as well.
m
0
l
October 25, 2009 12:15:19 AM

neither ..... norton always has and still is a resource HOG! , as for kaspersky i have run it on win7 beta and rc1 ... but i was NOT impressed at all (also slow and chunky with resources). i'd suggest AVG or Avast
m
0
l
a b $ Windows 7
October 25, 2009 12:27:15 AM

Norton should be killed. With fire. LOTS of fire.
m
0
l
a b è Antivirus
a c 401 $ Windows 7
October 25, 2009 12:27:35 AM

avg is junk!avast and avira are decent!
m
0
l
a c 215 $ Windows 7
October 25, 2009 1:15:16 AM

BadKharmaCDN said:
neither ..... norton always has and still is a resource HOG! , as for kaspersky i have run it on win7 beta and rc1 ... but i was NOT impressed at all (also slow and chunky with resources). i'd suggest AVG or Avast


AVG is starting (actually has already started) following in Symantec's footsteps from back in 2004/2005 at the height of resource usage issues which plagued their consumer products for years. I'm still not sure why they didn't use the same approach as their corporate products which were much better about their resource footprint. They would have kept a lot of customers doing that, but i'm glad Symantec has learned. It's just too bad that Grisoft is going to have to do the same.
m
0
l
!