HP Version ASUS 9600 Pro - Tech info

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

I recently purchased a 'Pulled' version of the ASUS Radeon 9600 Pro board.
It appears this card was manufactured for Hewlett-Packard. Details show the
GPU is RV350, with 256MB Hynix HY5DU561622CT-5 Memory. Problem is - I can't
find ANY details on this card at either the H-P site or at ASUS.

Anyone have any more details they can share regarding this board? BTW, card
only has an aluminum Heatsink and came clocked at 324 core and 195 mem...

MikeL - 'For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert' - Arthur
C. Clarke

 

[augustus]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

"Looie52" <malewis52@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8OydnVu6aN8u4V7dRVn-ug@comcast.com...
> I recently purchased a 'Pulled' version of the ASUS Radeon 9600 Pro board.
> It appears this card was manufactured for Hewlett-Packard. Details show
the
> GPU is RV350, with 256MB Hynix HY5DU561622CT-5 Memory. Problem is - I
can't
> find ANY details on this card at either the H-P site or at ASUS.
>
> Anyone have any more details they can share regarding this board? BTW,
card
> only has an aluminum Heatsink and came clocked at 324 core and 195 mem...


You've got a straight 9600, not a 9600 Pro. Might even be a 9600SE. And
it's a little underclocked at that. Straight 9600 and the 9600SE have a
325Mhz core, and 200Mhz memory. A 9600 Pro will have a 400MHz core and
300Mhz memory. A 9600SE is the same as a straight 9600, except for 64bit
memory pathways. AIDA32 will tell you this, and I think Sandra will too.

 

[augustus]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

"Looie52" <malewis52@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:8OydnVu6aN8u4V7dRVn-ug@comcast.com...
> I recently purchased a 'Pulled' version of the ASUS Radeon 9600 Pro board.
> It appears this card was manufactured for Hewlett-Packard. Details show
the
> GPU is RV350, with 256MB Hynix HY5DU561622CT-5 Memory. Problem is - I
can't
> find ANY details on this card at either the H-P site or at ASUS.

You definitely have a 9600SE there. Asus only makes 2 of ATI 9600
family....the 9600XT and the 9600SE. Those slow 5ns memory and those
core/memory speeds rule out the XT. If you just bought this and were told it
was a 9600 Pro I'd be taking it back for a refund right away.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

OK Folks, a little more detail here...
This card was built SPECIFICALLY as an OEM card for H-P. The BIOS of the
card specifically says:
ATI RADEON 9600 PRO
I can clock the core to about 434 using the ATI tool, and memory to about
245.
Here are some more details from Everest (Aida):
Graphics Processor Properties:
Video Adapter ATI Radeon 9600
(RV350)
GPU Code Name RV350
PCI Device 1002 / 4150
Transistors 76 million
Process Technology 0.13u
Bus Type AGP
Memory Size 256 MB
GPU Clock 376 MHz
RAMDAC Clock 400 MHz
Pixel Pipelines 4
TMU Per Pipeline 1
Vertex Shaders 2 (v2.0)
Pixel Shaders 1 (v2.0)
DirectX Hardware Support DirectX v9.0
Pixel Fillrate 1504 MPixel/s
Texel Fillrate 1504 MTexel/s

Memory Bus Properties:
Bus Type DDR
Bus Width 128-bit
Real Clock 198 MHz (DDR)
Effective Clock 396 MHz
Bandwidth 6336 MB/s

Thanks Again All!
MikeL 'For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert.' - Arthur
C. Clarke

"Augustus" <tiberius@weeik.com> wrote in message
news:ELPwc.27388$B%4.1666@clgrps12...
>
> "Looie52" <malewis52@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:8OydnVu6aN8u4V7dRVn-ug@comcast.com...
> > I recently purchased a 'Pulled' version of the ASUS Radeon 9600 Pro
board.
> > It appears this card was manufactured for Hewlett-Packard. Details show
> the
> > GPU is RV350, with 256MB Hynix HY5DU561622CT-5 Memory. Problem is - I
> can't
> > find ANY details on this card at either the H-P site or at ASUS.
>
> You definitely have a 9600SE there. Asus only makes 2 of ATI 9600
> family....the 9600XT and the 9600SE. Those slow 5ns memory and those
> core/memory speeds rule out the XT. If you just bought this and were told
it
> was a 9600 Pro I'd be taking it back for a refund right away.
>
>

 

[augustus]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

> Here are some more details from Everest (Aida):
> Graphics Processor Properties:
> Video Adapter ATI Radeon 9600
> (RV350)
> GPU Code Name RV350
> PCI Device 1002 / 4150
> Transistors 76 million
> Process Technology 0.13u
> Bus Type AGP
> Memory Size 256 MB
> GPU Clock 376 MHz
> RAMDAC Clock 400 MHz
> Pixel Pipelines 4
> TMU Per Pipeline 1
> Vertex Shaders 2 (v2.0)
> Pixel Shaders 1 (v2.0)
> DirectX Hardware Support DirectX v9.0
> Pixel Fillrate 1504 MPixel/s
> Texel Fillrate 1504 MTexel/s
>
> Memory Bus Properties:
> Bus Type DDR
> Bus Width 128-bit
> Real Clock 198 MHz (DDR)
> Effective Clock 396 MHz
> Bandwidth 6336 MB/s
>

Hmmmm....your original post gave a core of 324Mhz and a memory of
195.....which is right on for 9600SE spec....a core of 376Mhz with 198Mhz
memory is representative of the cheaper OEM 256Mb 9600 Pro cards. AIDA32
also says 128 bit memory, so it's not an SE model. Looks like some kind of
inexpensive OEM 256Mb 9600 Pro with slow memory. Try running 3DMark 2001 and
2003 with your overclock and see if there's any artifacting. I suspect that
memory won't take such a high overclock when under 3D load.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

OK Augustus - you caught me! Yeah I bumped the core up to see what would
happen...
I don't want to go TOO high with the Cheapo HS and No fan...

I'll try running the benchmarks and see where that leads me...


"Augustus" <tiberius@weeik.com> wrote in message
news:Rj0xc.29374$DV4.6787@clgrps13...
> > Here are some more details from Everest (Aida):
> > Graphics Processor Properties:
snip
> > Memory Size 256 MB
> > GPU Clock 376 MHz
> > RAMDAC Clock 400 MHz
> > Pixel Pipelines 4
> > TMU Per Pipeline 1
> > Vertex Shaders 2 (v2.0)
> > Pixel Shaders 1 (v2.0)
> > DirectX Hardware Support DirectX v9.0
> > Pixel Fillrate 1504 MPixel/s
> > Texel Fillrate 1504 MTexel/s
> >
> > Memory Bus Properties:
> > Bus Type DDR
> > Bus Width 128-bit
> > Real Clock 198 MHz (DDR)
> > Effective Clock 396 MHz
> > Bandwidth 6336 MB/s
> >
>
> Hmmmm....your original post gave a core of 324Mhz and a memory of
> 195.....which is right on for 9600SE spec....a core of 376Mhz with 198Mhz
> memory is representative of the cheaper OEM 256Mb 9600 Pro cards. AIDA32
> also says 128 bit memory, so it's not an SE model. Looks like some kind of
> inexpensive OEM 256Mb 9600 Pro with slow memory. Try running 3DMark 2001
and
> 2003 with your overclock and see if there's any artifacting. I suspect
that
> memory won't take such a high overclock when under 3D load.
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 16:01:53 GMT, "Augustus" <tiberius@weeik.com>
wrote:

>> Here are some more details from Everest (Aida):
>> Graphics Processor Properties:
>> Video Adapter ATI Radeon 9600
>> (RV350)
>> GPU Code Name RV350
>> PCI Device 1002 / 4150
>> Transistors 76 million
>> Process Technology 0.13u
>> Bus Type AGP
>> Memory Size 256 MB
>> GPU Clock 376 MHz
>> RAMDAC Clock 400 MHz
>> Pixel Pipelines 4
>> TMU Per Pipeline 1
>> Vertex Shaders 2 (v2.0)
>> Pixel Shaders 1 (v2.0)
>> DirectX Hardware Support DirectX v9.0
>> Pixel Fillrate 1504 MPixel/s
>> Texel Fillrate 1504 MTexel/s
>>
>> Memory Bus Properties:
>> Bus Type DDR
>> Bus Width 128-bit
>> Real Clock 198 MHz (DDR)
>> Effective Clock 396 MHz
>> Bandwidth 6336 MB/s
>>
>
>Hmmmm....your original post gave a core of 324Mhz and a memory of
>195.....which is right on for 9600SE spec....a core of 376Mhz with 198Mhz
>memory is representative of the cheaper OEM 256Mb 9600 Pro cards. AIDA32
>also says 128 bit memory, so it's not an SE model. Looks like some kind of
>inexpensive OEM 256Mb 9600 Pro with slow memory. Try running 3DMark 2001 and
>2003 with your overclock and see if there's any artifacting. I suspect that
>memory won't take such a high overclock when under 3D load.

Remeber - AIDA32 is no more, the developer "sold" it to another
company... But its still FREE for personal USE... but they charge
for the enterprise version now (does not effect us).


- - - - -
Remember: In the USA - it is dangeroud to draw or write about Heir Bush in a negative way. The police or SS are called, people threaten to kill you. (What country is this again?)

- 15yr old boy in Washington was disciplined for drawing such images.
- White House blows cover of an undercover agent because her husband said there were no WMD (before the USA started the war) - her job was finding terrorist. (This makes sense?)
God bless the land of the free. Where you can burn the Constitution... Ashcroft does it every day.