Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (
More info?)
fish wrote:
> I recently was forced to replace my 9700pro that I have had for a
> couple of years with another card.
> The X800's from ATI are fine, read about them online but the price is
> still high.
>
> If your looking for a 'value' then the is no doubt that the 9800pro
> is it!
>
> I picked up a 9800pro for under $200 as a replacement for the 9700pro
> (it was damaged) and I am very pleased with the cards performance.
> Its overclock performance is amazing too.
>
> Personally, I will be buying either an X800 or an nVidia card in a few
> months. I'm waiting to see what kind of performance improvements ATI
> makes with its newer CAT drivers for OGL. If its not great then I am
> likely jumping ship to nVidia.
>
> Look at the Pixel Shader 3 model. Its VERY impressive and something
> that the ATI card can't do.
>
> Either way you can't go wrong with the newest series cards if your
> willing to pay close to $400 for one.
>
I put it to you that the average human eye can't tell the difference
between Pixel Shader 2 and 3.
Only one game currently uses Pixel Shader 3 and that is FarCry. I
would suggest that anyone thinking of buying a card based on PS3 does
some research.
I will even give you a head start:
http://tinyurl.com/6w7bo
The telling part of this article is that most people only have access
to a DX7 type card ... so will game makers sacrifice this market ... I
would suggest not.
regards
@ndrew