Ad
News

Matrox ships TripleHead2Go

Published on May 25, 2006

Matrox said it has begun shipments of its TripleHead2Go, which lets users span the desktop across three monitors and a total resolution of 3840 x 1024 pixels. Read more

Matrox announces first PCIe x1 graphics card

Published on July 13, 2005

Yes, there is more than Nvidia and ATI and just in case you recently wondered whatever happened to Matrox, we have some news for you. Read more

Matrox Stretches TripleHead2Go To 5040x1050 Pixels

Published on August 06, 2008

Montreal (Canada) - Matrox today launched triple widescreen modes for its TripleHead2Go Digital Edition box, which enables computer enthusiasts to combine three widescreen displays for a maximum screen resolution of 5040 x 1050 pixels. Read more

Matrox unveils DualHead2Go Digital Edition external multi-display upgrade for PCs

Published on January 09, 2007

Matrox Graphics has announced its DualHead2Go Digital Edition external multi-display upgrade device featuring digital outputs. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Editor's Corner: Overclocking Core i7

Published on November 04, 2008

After discovering Intel's Overspeed Protection in yesterday's first-look at Core i7's performance, we're back to set the record straight on the overclocking headroom of the flagship 965 Extreme and entry-level Core i7 920. Read more

Intel's Core i7: Blazing Fast, But Crippled O/C

Published on November 03, 2008

Core i7--previously referred to as Nehalem--requires new motherboards, coolers and memory. Its performance is compelling and means AMD is falling behind even further, but Intel is putting in some speed bumps that will impact overclocking enthusiasts. Read more

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on October 31, 2008

Three dramatically different builds face off in a show of performance, defining the real value of each. Our mainstream system is designed to meet the needs of most users. Who should spend more and who can live with less? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $500 Gaming PC

Published on October 30, 2008

For the second to last day of our System Builder Marathon series, we add a $500 gaming PC to the mix. It's not going to be as quick as our other two builds, but we think Paul was able to get some serious value from this thing. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » ATI » ATI RAGE FURY, e-TNT M64, SIS 315, Matrox G400 Which one giv
 

ATI RAGE FURY, e-TNT M64, SIS 315, Matrox G400 Which one giv




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : ATI RAGE FURY, e-TNT M64, SIS 315, Matrox G400 Which one giv
 
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

 

ATI Rage Fury, e-TNT M64, SIS 315, Matrox G400 Which one gives the
best graphics? Right now I am using the ATI Rage Fury it is a 32 meg
agp. I was thinking about using the M64, or the Matrox G400 if one of
them would perform better? I tried the sis 315 and even though it got
better bench marks in 3dmark2001 almost twice the score it was so
slow playing GTA3 it was not funny and the ATI runs GTA3 just fine
and smooth. But I Havent tried the m64 or the matrox yet. I was
wondering which one is known to be the best? like i said I tried the
SIS and it is the only 64 meg all others are 32 and I quickly learned
megs don't equal speed! I use the pc as my windows box just for tv and
games it is my second pc so i dont want to buy a new card just for it
so I want to use the best i got I guess i should note i use
powerstrip to over clock the ATI right now i have it cranked up all
the way engine clock and mem clock both set at 160MHz I had installed
a 486 fan on the heatsink and it runs fine all day with no problems. I
was thinking of putting the m64 or Matrox in and over clocking them if
one of them are known to out do the ATI. any help hear would be
greatly apprecated!

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

 

"tommyussery" <tommyussery@sbcglobal-dot-net.no-spam.invalid> wrote in
message news:42a06a37$1_2@alt.athenanews.com...
> ATI Rage Fury, e-TNT M64, SIS 315, Matrox G400 Which one gives the
> best graphics? Right now I am using the ATI Rage Fury it is a 32 meg
> agp. I was thinking about using the M64, or the Matrox G400 if one of
> them would perform better? I tried the sis 315 and even though it got
> better bench marks in 3dmark2001 almost twice the score it was so
> slow playing GTA3 it was not funny and the ATI runs GTA3 just fine
> and smooth. But I Havent tried the m64 or the matrox yet. I was
> wondering which one is known to be the best? like i said I tried the
> SIS and it is the only 64 meg all others are 32 and I quickly learned
> megs don't equal speed! I use the pc as my windows box just for tv and
> games it is my second pc so i dont want to buy a new card just for it
> so I want to use the best i got I guess i should note i use
> powerstrip to over clock the ATI right now i have it cranked up all
> the way engine clock and mem clock both set at 160MHz I had installed
> a 486 fan on the heatsink and it runs fine all day with no problems. I
> was thinking of putting the m64 or Matrox in and over clocking them if
> one of them are known to out do the ATI. any help hear would be
> greatly apprecated!

the M64 is a cutdown TNT card 64bit rather than 128bit so its very slow and
the Matrox is designed for CAD work and image quality not games. The Rage
Fury is probably the best out of those. Alternatively sell them all and put
the money towards a Radeon 9200.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

 

thanks very much... I have been thinking of selling them to upgrade
but just havent got around to it, You know if it is'nt the main pc
then it is not on the top of the to-do list. My Dad is a admin for
three different oil production company's so I always get boxes full
of old parts, to throw together different pc's with. All the old
stuff he gives me, and sometimes whole pc's that I ripp apart and
store in parts bins. So it is never very important to upgrade spare
pc's I just wait for the next box of goodies. It was just this time I
wanted to know what the best card out of the bunch was. I though it
might had been the 64 meg sis315 ..till I tried it! So I thought I
would ask people who actully knew the older cards I had.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati (More info?)

 

tommyussery wrote:
> thanks very much... I have been thinking of selling them to upgrade
> but just havent got around to it, You know if it is'nt the main pc
> then it is not on the top of the to-do list. My Dad is a admin for
> three different oil production company's so I always get boxes full
> of old parts, to throw together different pc's with. All the old
> stuff he gives me, and sometimes whole pc's that I ripp apart and
> store in parts bins. So it is never very important to upgrade spare
> pc's I just wait for the next box of goodies. It was just this time I
> wanted to know what the best card out of the bunch was. I though it
> might had been the 64 meg sis315 ..till I tried it! So I thought I
> would ask people who actully knew the older cards I had.
>
rage card is the best of those, stick with it until the next box of
free parts ha ha


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » ATI » ATI RAGE FURY, e-TNT M64, SIS 315, Matrox G400 Which one giv

Go to:
 

Google Ads