Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox (More info?)
I have a composite video "pass-through" facility on my DV camcorder (Sony
TRV30E) whereby a composite video input signal is converted to DV out.
This means that I can use my camcorder as an external converter and capture
composite video to a firewire input on my p.c.
Is there any advantage of using RT.X100 composite video capture over using
the analogue "pass-through" facility on my camcorder (Sony TRV30E) whereby a
composite video input signal is converted to DV out? Which would give the
best quality - has anyone experimented?
(Note: I already own a Matrox RT.X100 and use it for DV capture
I have a composite video "pass-through" facility on my DV camcorder (Sony
TRV30E) whereby a composite video input signal is converted to DV out.
This means that I can use my camcorder as an external converter and capture
composite video to a firewire input on my p.c.
Is there any advantage of using RT.X100 composite video capture over using
the analogue "pass-through" facility on my camcorder (Sony TRV30E) whereby a
composite video input signal is converted to DV out? Which would give the
best quality - has anyone experimented?
(Note: I already own a Matrox RT.X100 and use it for DV capture