Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Matrox » G550 vs. ATI Radeon X300 Se
 

G550 vs. ATI Radeon X300 Se

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : G550 vs. ATI Radeon X300 Se
 
More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox (More info?)

 

My wife just bought a Dell 9100, with an  ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
card with 128 MB memory.  We also have a Matrox G550 lying around (it was  
supposed to go into her old computer).
 
Is there any reason to replace the ATI card with the Matrox?  Her main  
needs are (i) text editing, and (ii) photo editing.  She will be using one  
older analog monitor (17" NEC), and  Dell digital ultrasharp 1950FP 19"  
monitor.
 
Thanks --
 
 -- And\y Barss

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox (More info?)

 

On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:05:22 +0000, Andrew Barss wrote:
 
>  
>  
> My wife just bought a Dell 9100, with an  ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
> card with 128 MB memory.  We also have a Matrox G550 lying around (it was
> supposed to go into her old computer).
>  
> Is there any reason to replace the ATI card with the Matrox?  Her main
> needs are (i) text editing, and (ii) photo editing.  She will be using one
> older analog monitor (17" NEC), and  Dell digital ultrasharp 1950FP 19"
> monitor.
>  
If you're looking for a better 2D quality the answer is a definitive YES.
I have an old G400 without dvi, a gorgeous Sony 19" panel and a radeon
9200 with dvi on another computer.
I have 3 inputs, so I can check its quality in real time. The radeon is
hooked on the dvi. Working at 1280x1024, 75Hz refresh for G400, 60 Hz
(of course) for radeon.
If you compare the same text you understand immediately what I mean.
Colours are the same, but here end all similarities.
What a pity that matrox decided not to support linux anymore with their P
series products.
 
Please, don't tell me that their drivers do work. Where is X86_64
support?

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox (More info?)

 

Is the Sony a CRT or LCD monitor?  She will be using an NEC CRT and a Dell  
digital LCD.
 
 -- Andy Barss
 
--  
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
                             Andy Barss
          Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona
                   Douglass 208,  626-3284
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox (More info?)

 

On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 16:57:25 +0000, Andrew Barss wrote:
 
> Is the Sony a CRT or LCD monitor?  She will be using an NEC CRT and a Dell
> digital LCD.
>  
Panel, i.e. lcd. HSX93, 19". Do they have a CRT with a dvi input? Don't
think so.

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox (More info?)

 

Tatanka Yotanka <klamath@org.no> wrote:
: On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 03:05:22 +0000, Andrew Barss wrote:
:>  
: If you're looking for a better 2D quality the answer is a definitive YES.
: I have an old G400 without dvi, a gorgeous Sony 19" panel and a radeon
: 9200 with dvi on another computer.
 
Is there any way to install both cards on the machine?  I'm just thinking  
that the 128MB memory on the ATI might come in handy from time to time.
 
Thanks for the advice --
 
Andy Barss

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox (More info?)

 

I'm a Matrox fan and still use a Matrox G400 DH 32MB in a work computer.
But the ATI X300 is a much newer design, stay with the ATI
 
"Andrew Barss" <barss@basil.u.arizona.edu> wrote in message  
news:dhd19i$if3$1@onion.ccit.arizona.edu...
>
>
> My wife just bought a Dell 9100, with an  ATI Radeon X300 SE HyperMemory
> card with 128 MB memory.  We also have a Matrox G550 lying around (it was
> supposed to go into her old computer).
>
> Is there any reason to replace the ATI card with the Matrox?  Her main
> needs are (i) text editing, and (ii) photo editing.  She will be using one
> older analog monitor (17" NEC), and  Dell digital ultrasharp 1950FP 19"
> monitor.
>
> Thanks --
>
> -- And\y Barss

More Information

Archived from groups: alt.comp.periphs.videocards.matrox (More info?)

 

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:57:31 +0000, Andrew Barss wrote:
 
 
> : If you're looking for a better 2D quality the answer is a definitive
> : YES. I have an old G400 without dvi, a gorgeous Sony 19" panel and a
> : radeon 9200 with dvi on another computer.
>  
> Is there any way to install both cards on the machine?  I'm just thinking
> that the 128MB memory on the ATI might come in handy from time to time.
>  
I suppose it's possible. The ati X300 is of course better in 3D, not by
much however. Otherwise 128M are just useful if you do 3D.
 
Look here for gpu comparisons:
http://users.erols.com/chare/video.htm

Profile: stranger
More Information

G550: directx 7.0 supported ,wihtout T&L
X300 SE: DX 9.0 supported.with T&L
then....


Go to:
Add a reply
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Matrox » G550 vs. ATI Radeon X300 Se
 

Google Ads
Ad