Talisman is nifty! There are a slew of really nice themes and such for it available and it does some very nice things that even windowblinds and such can't do.
i heard from somewhere that using other shells was potentially likely to crash computers rather often.
i am curious if this does, and also does it use more CPU power. i am considering it an option but i'd like to be comfortable in the fact that it will be an advantage rather than a disadvantage to have.
Alltaken
<A HREF="http://www.mud-puddle.co.nz" target="_new">http://www.mud-puddle.co.nz</A> its where its all going on, oh and its also all going on HERE <A HREF="http://doug.mud-puddle.co.nz/gallery/" target="_new">http://doug.mud-puddle.co.nz/gallery/</A>
I've used it off and on, yes it eats more memory/cpu than the default shell (depending on theme), no i've not had any stability issues under old talisman on 98se or with current talisman on xp.
Edit: It's not really to much an issue in all honesty, you can switch between windows shell and talisman fairly easily. I think talisman can be run without using it as a shell too (but you loose some features... or maybe I'm thinking of windowblinds?)
Shadus<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by shadus on 12/10/03 10:01 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
but i need most of that for 3d animation and image manipulation, so yeah i'd need to be able to turn it off super quick LOL.
does it work by just overlaying basicly a program over the top of the screen in the mode without using the shell?
Alltaken
<A HREF="http://www.mud-puddle.co.nz" target="_new">http://www.mud-puddle.co.nz</A> its where its all going on, oh and its also all going on HERE <A HREF="http://doug.mud-puddle.co.nz/gallery/" target="_new">http://doug.mud-puddle.co.nz/gallery/</A>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.