Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless (
More info?)
It seems such a shame that Bill is relying on WNIC vendors to fill the gap
where the W2K OS is letting us down.
I have a WNIC by INEXQ, being a CRO54g and comes with a supplicant RaConfig
version 1.7.2.0 + driver v 2.2.1.
My idea of WLAN is that the software should load with network services i.e.
as a win2k service, which it doesn't. Nor does it seem to work with WZC,
which is on the Win2K SP4 machine.
Although this software has support for WPA-PSK, I have so far failed to
connect with this enabled. Checking of keys is a bit tedious on the INEXQ
iSWO54t AP and I will have to re-check.
(the key on the AP is shown in 32 separate boxes each with 2 hex digits -
tedious; but on the WNIC client it is in a single field and can be pasted),
My MAIN POINT is that the WLAN should be up and running before any log-in,
so that authorised file sharing can occur as required over the WLAN. The
present out of box setup doesn't do that; nor has Bill been of much help
with ensuring that W2K and WXP will properly work together.
There are many corporates still installing new copies of the W2K and the OS
really should do better than this.
==
Ozz
____________________________________________________________________________
_________
"Steve Riley [MSFT]" <steriley@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:61020632428077731553744@news.microsoft.com...
> Eric, the lifecycle web site lists dates for our technical support of the
> product. The OP is asking whether Windows 2000 supports WPA -- meaning can
> you use WPA hardware with Windows 2000. That question has nothing to do
with
> technical support and product lifecycle.
>
> We have no plans to add WPA to Windows 2000. WPA is included in Windows XP
> SP 2 and SP 1 with a patch; it's also coming in Windows Server 2003.
Several
> WNIC vendors have created WPA drivers for Windows 2000, however.
>
> Steve Riley
> steriley@microsoft.com
>
>
>
> > Greetings Graeme,
> >
> > That isn't necessarily true.
> >
> > If you look at these two links you'll notice that June 30, 2010 when
> > support for Windows 2000 ends. Look at the Window Server Product Life
> > Cycle and you'll see there is still paid support, and you'll still be
> > able to get security hotfixes free through March 31, 2007 to all
> > customers.
> >
> > For more details, see the following links.
> >
> > http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/support/lifecycle/
> >
> >
;LifeWin]http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;[ln];LifeWin
> >
> > ___________________
> > Eric Cross
> > Microsoft MVP (Windows Networking)
> >
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
> > "Ken Wright" <ken.wright@NOSPAMntlworld.com> wrote in message
> > news:OrkJdYsBFHA.3616@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >
> >> There may be no support for 2K but that doesn't mean it doesn't work
> >>
> >>
> >> I have a wireless network with an XP Desktop hardwired, and two
> >> wireless
> >> 2K
> >> laptops. Buffalo kit for all elements and WPA-AES enabled as
> >> standard on
> >> all. The kit is all 125MB but I believe that you only get that with
> >> XP,
> >> so
> >> best I can get is 54MBps. Kit was simplicity itself to set up (I was
> >> a
> >> complete newbie), and it all worked straight out of the box,
> >> including the
> >> encryption.
> >> --
> >> Regards
> >> Ken.......................
> >> "Graeme" <gjfrew@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:38umv05g3d9dm5bugsvbur4f3s3p60n538@4ax.com...
> >>> I was recently advised by a Microsoft MVP that there is no support
> >>> for WPA in Win 2K.
> >>>
> >>> WPA is only available in Win XP sp2 or in Win XP pre-sp2 with a
> >>> patch applied.
> >>>
> >>> ...Graeme
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:22:46 +0200, "Rolf Rettinger"
> >>> <news.rolf_rettinger@tarkett.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Is there any WPA suppliant for Windows 2000 available you do not
> >>>> have to
> >>>>
> >> pay
> >>
> >>>> for?
> >>>>
> >>>> I would lik eto use WPA together with RADIUS authentication. On
> >>>> WinXP
> >>>>
> >> it's
> >>
> >>>> working great but for Windows 2000 I need a WPA suppliant to make
> >>>> it
> >>>>
> >> work.
> >>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> Rolf
> >>>>
>
>