Archived from groups: rec.video,rec.video.desktop,rec.photo.digital,alt.comp.periphs.dcameras (
More info?)
"PJx" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news
0caf0lj81o6qakqn16s5b79b3sa54r0f7@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:40:24 GMT, "leo" <someone@somewhere.net> wrote:
>
> >"AnthonyR" <toomuchspam@tolisthere.com> wrote in message
> >news:UnRIc.19533$oW6.4716992@twister.nyc.rr.com...
> >>
> >> "leo" <someone@somewhere.net> wrote in message
> >> news:9cGIc.5417$kK.1500@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> >> > <hbaker1@pipeline.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:f173f01pfcsrd3ib5ometnas9lvgu50450@4ax.com...
> >> > > This camera claims 10x optical zoom, 3.2MP stills, 640x480x30fps
> >> > > MPEG videos stored on SD card.
> >> > >
> >> > > Does anyone have any experience with this camera?
> >> > >
> >> > > Are there any stills and/or videos from this camera posted anywhere
> >> > > on the internet?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Why do you concern about the video quality from those digicam? They
are
> >> just
> >> > gadgets which have no practical use. Get yourself a DV camcorder
instead
> >> for
> >> > real video shooting. Only DV tapes have enough storage for quality
> >videos.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Leo,
> >> I currently have a digital camera that only does video at 320 x160, and
> >when
> >> I didn't bother to plan a video
> >> for a simple gathering, tiny little video clips of people just saying
> >hello,
> >> are so cool to have rather than just stills on a camera.
> >> Remember early film movie cameras? They only held 3 minutes of film,
and
> >> people took less wasted shots, yet some family vacation films were
still
> >> boring, lol.
> >> Maybe less is more, anyway, having the power to do 640x480 at 30 fps on
a
> >> still camera on sd memory can come in handy when there is no video
event,
> >> and you are just taking pictures and then decide to capture 10 seconds
of
> >a
> >> person saying hello etc. after many years, those 10 seconds are just as
> >> priceless as the snapshot, and there would have been no video at all
> >without
> >> that power because let's face it, most people don't carry a dv camera
> >> everywhere.
> >> Although getting them smaller, integrating them with digital cameras,
and
> >> making storage digital so your forced to constantly upload to another
> >medium
> >> like computer hard drive and dvd, will help more people start to take
> >videos
> >> just about anywhere at anytime. You must have vision beyond what is
> >> available or practical today, the future always is different than what
we
> >> think it should be.
> >> AnthonyR.
> >
> >
> >Well, I have had several digital cameras with video features but I never
> >used it beyond the first try out. I do have a DV camcorder when I am
> >interested in taking videos. I have a wide screen HDTV and before I can
> >afford an HDTV camcorder, I am thinking of getting Canon's standard
> >definition wide screen camcorder. ;-)
> >
> >I guess some people are satisfied with the throw back short 8mm film
> >experience.
> >
>
> So they are coming out with hdtv 'ready' video cameras?
>
> Pj
There IS already a HD camcorder, 1CCD (720p) from JVC. Sony will have a 3CCD
HD camcorder. They are expensive, of course. I am talking about Canon's
widescreen camcorder, already in the market. Not HD but the sensor is wide
screen format, instead of merely letterboxed in other low end camcorders.