Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage (
More info?)
"Jorge E. Ravelo" <jorge@ravelo.org> wrote in message news:McKdnX18PutVXLXcRVn-ug@comcast.com...
> "Odie Ferrous" <odie_ferrous@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:4128BD03.E564F409@hotmail.com...
>
> > A "SCSI guy" should be more in the nous than anyone else!
> >
> > Odie
>
> Thanks for your response OF!
>
> The reason I am such an ignoramus is that with my Adaptec 2940UW
> controller I am not able to mirror/stripe anything as it is a non-RAID controller.
> This card, with my original Quantum Atlas 10K drive has served me faithfully
> and transparently through many a PC rebuild, possibly four different setups
> since purchased! Now it resides in a Pentium 4 ASUS p4800E-Deluxe mobo that
> has a SATA Promise RAID controller,
> and as my supplementary IDE HD (a WD 8MB buffer 80 GB)
> is slower than the Atlas,
And an original Atlas 10K is already quite slow itself, compared to that 80GB WD.
> I thought setting up a RAID stripping setup with two WD 10k RAPTORS
> would speed up the system.
If your slow Atlas beats an 80GB WD then you must be doing lots and lots
of small record IO, almost entirely. Even one Raptor should beat the Atlas.
What you need is better access time, not better STR.
>
> Have a good evening,
>
> Jorge
>