Norton Ghost 2003 vs 9.0

[pat]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage (More info?)

What happened between Norton Ghost 2003 and Norton Ghost 9.0?

Did Drive Image get merged with NG2003?

I've been playing with the new NG9 and it looks good, but not sure what the
consensus is. Any good?

Lastly, I can't find a way to create backups on CD with the ability to boot
from the backup set of CDs created. Also, there doesn't seem to be a utility
to boot from DOS on a disaster recovery, like NG2003.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage (More info?)

"Pat" <hotpatpar@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:FIa%c.12312$Cr5.11780@trndny08...
> What happened between Norton Ghost 2003 and Norton Ghost 9.0?
>
> Did Drive Image get merged with NG2003?
>
> I've been playing with the new NG9 and it looks good, but not sure what
the
> consensus is. Any good?
>
> Lastly, I can't find a way to create backups on CD with the ability to
boot
> from the backup set of CDs created. Also, there doesn't seem to be a
utility
> to boot from DOS on a disaster recovery, like NG2003.
>

Don't know about Ghost but Symantec just killed Drive Image when they bought
it from Powerquest. Drive Image 2002 is the last useable version since the
main functionality tied up with DOS function. Nobody wants the Windows only
version. Even Symantec gave away free Drive Image 7 at CompUSA, nobody wants
it. The question is if any previous DI users turn to Ghost, I doubt it.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage (More info?)

"Ar Q" <ArthurQ283@hottmail.com> wrote in message
news:tDc%c.9514$w%6.4805@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Pat" <hotpatpar@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:FIa%c.12312$Cr5.11780@trndny08...
> > What happened between Norton Ghost 2003 and Norton Ghost 9.0?
> >
> > Did Drive Image get merged with NG2003?
> >
> > I've been playing with the new NG9 and it looks good, but not sure what
> the
> > consensus is. Any good?
> >
> > Lastly, I can't find a way to create backups on CD with the ability to
> boot
> > from the backup set of CDs created. Also, there doesn't seem to be a
> utility
> > to boot from DOS on a disaster recovery, like NG2003.
> >
>
> Don't know about Ghost but Symantec just killed Drive Image when they
bought
> it from Powerquest. Drive Image 2002 is the last useable version since the
> main functionality tied up with DOS function. Nobody wants the Windows
only
> version. Even Symantec gave away free Drive Image 7 at CompUSA, nobody
wants
> it. The question is if any previous DI users turn to Ghost, I doubt it.
>
>
Still for sale. DI2002 comes with it.
http://www.symantec.com/driveimage/

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage (More info?)

Lil' Dave wrote:
> "Ar Q" <ArthurQ283@hottmail.com> wrote
>> Don't know about Ghost but Symantec just killed Drive Image when
>> they bought it from Powerquest. Drive Image 2002 is the last useable
>> version since the main functionality tied up with DOS function.
>> Nobody wants the Windows only version. Even Symantec gave away free
>> Drive Image 7 at CompUSA, nobody wants it. The question is if any
>> previous DI users turn to Ghost, I doubt it.
>>
> Still for sale. DI2002 comes with it.
> http://www.symantec.com/driveimage/

Try to buy it though, and you get sent to:

Drive ImageT has been discontinued, but all features, and more,
are now available in Norton GhostT 9.0!

--
Mike

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage (More info?)

"Ar Q" wrote:
> Don't know about Ghost but Symantec just killed Drive Image
> when they bought it from Powerquest. Drive Image 2002 is the
> last useable version since the main functionality tied up with
> DOS function. Nobody wants the Windows only version.
> Even Symantec gave away free Drive Image 7 at CompUSA,
> nobody wants it. The question is if any previous DI users turn
> to Ghost, I doubt it.


Drive Image 7 didn't work for me until I installed .NET
Framework as a part of Visual Studio .NET. Then it worked
fine. (I run Windows XP Pro). I was advised by PowerQuest
to use DI 2002 if v.7 didn't work for me, but I could never
get the /IDE=ON switch to turn on DMA, so it ran really
slowly. Right now, I have no complaints about Drive Image 7,
but I don't do any automated backup procedures, so I can't
comment about that.

*TimDaniels*

 

[pat]

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage (More info?)

Norton Ghost 9.0 is advertised to NOW HAVE DRIVE IMAGE TECHNOLOGY. Also, it
allows Windows backups of drive images. I have done an image of one of my
secondary drives and it stayed completely within Windows, no DOS mode. I
have not tried that on my Windows XP drive.



"Mike Redrobe" <mike@redrobe.net> wrote in message
news:75f%c.2129$lO1.21961934@news-text.cableinet.net...
> Lil' Dave wrote:
> > "Ar Q" <ArthurQ283@hottmail.com> wrote
> >> Don't know about Ghost but Symantec just killed Drive Image when
> >> they bought it from Powerquest. Drive Image 2002 is the last useable
> >> version since the main functionality tied up with DOS function.
> >> Nobody wants the Windows only version. Even Symantec gave away free
> >> Drive Image 7 at CompUSA, nobody wants it. The question is if any
> >> previous DI users turn to Ghost, I doubt it.
> >>
> > Still for sale. DI2002 comes with it.
> > http://www.symantec.com/driveimage/
>
> Try to buy it though, and you get sent to:
>
> Drive ImageT has been discontinued, but all features, and more,
> are now available in Norton GhostT 9.0!
>
> --
> Mike
>
>