Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > Games General Discussions > another article saying pc games are at risk

another article saying pc games are at risk

Forum Games General : Games General Discussions - another article saying pc games are at risk

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

x-no-archive: yes

again the same view which i partially agree with...

article in cnet
"Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
By David Carnoy
http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html

pc games are declining and we pc gamers must stop it
if we still want to have pc games to play we must do our role
which is support the platform by all means we got

for me the role we must play is:
.. buy pc games for ourselves
.. buy pc games to give as gifts to friends and family
.. never copy pc games to others
.. never lend pc games to others
.. buy at least 1 pc game title a month
.. stay exclusive and faithful to pc games and don't support
any kind of consoles or other gaming platforms
.. actively fight against things that damage pc games like
piracy, microsoft attitude toward pc games and consoles

support your favorite hobby! support pc games!
long live pc games!

--
to check authenticity of the real "steamKILLER" reassure that
the post came from a google server and that the email address
is "sayNO2steam@yahoo.com"

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"steamKILLER" <sayNO2steam@yahoo.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:1117878181.584849.298790@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> again the same view which i partially agree with...
>
> article in cnet
> "Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
> By David Carnoy
> http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html
>
> pc games are declining and we pc gamers must stop it
> if we still want to have pc games to play we must do our role
> which is support the platform by all means we got



you sound more like a 'pc games shareholder' than a player to me, and well
if pc gaming has to die, i got plenty of other things to do, its not a vital
issue to me!

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

steamKILLER wrote:

> again the same view which i partially agree with...
> article in cnet
> "Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
> By David Carnoy
> http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html
>
If I can run my precious Steam on the new Xbox 360 I might consider
this
But on the other hand an XBox is nothing more or less than a challenged
PC

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

Old saying, "Water will find its own level".
Having a "strategy" to keep PC games alive will never work on a grass-roots
level.

I like PC gaming, but I wouldn't loose one minute of sleep over it fading
away forever.

Something will always be there to take its place.
"steamKILLER" <sayNO2steam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117878181.584849.298790@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> again the same view which i partially agree with...
>
> article in cnet
> "Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
> By David Carnoy
> http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html
>
> pc games are declining and we pc gamers must stop it
> if we still want to have pc games to play we must do our role
> which is support the platform by all means we got
>
> for me the role we must play is:
> . buy pc games for ourselves
> . buy pc games to give as gifts to friends and family
> . never copy pc games to others
> . never lend pc games to others
> . buy at least 1 pc game title a month
> . stay exclusive and faithful to pc games and don't support
> any kind of consoles or other gaming platforms
> . actively fight against things that damage pc games like
> piracy, microsoft attitude toward pc games and consoles
>
> support your favorite hobby! support pc games!
> long live pc games!
>
> --
> to check authenticity of the real "steamKILLER" reassure that
> the post came from a google server and that the email address
> is "sayNO2steam@yahoo.com"
>

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

On 4 Jun 2005 02:43:01 -0700, "steamKILLER" <sayNO2steam@yahoo.com>
wrote:

>article in cnet
>"Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
>By David Carnoy
>http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html

[snip]

You'd have a lot of interesting posts if it wasn't for your lunatic
commentary.

Tim

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

steamKILLER wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> again the same view which i partially agree with...
>
> article in cnet
> "Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
> By David Carnoy
> http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html
>
> pc games are declining and we pc gamers must stop it
> if we still want to have pc games to play we must do our role
> which is support the platform by all means we got
>
> for me the role we must play is:
> . buy pc games for ourselves
> . buy pc games to give as gifts to friends and family
> . never copy pc games to others
> . never lend pc games to others
> . buy at least 1 pc game title a month
> . stay exclusive and faithful to pc games and don't support
> any kind of consoles or other gaming platforms
> . actively fight against things that damage pc games like
> piracy, microsoft attitude toward pc games and consoles
>
> support your favorite hobby! support pc games!
> long live pc games!
>
> --
> to check authenticity of the real "steamKILLER" reassure that
> the post came from a google server and that the email address
> is "sayNO2steam@yahoo.com"
>
Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
happened, yet. A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
technologicla edge.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

> Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
> there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
> happened, yet.

agreed.

>A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain
> the technologicla edge.

a month after?.. they already have ;)





--
DalienX

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Chris B." <nospam@xyxyxy.com> wrote in message
news:oLmdnV7PWNnCMDzfRVn-gg@comcast.com...

> Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
> there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
> happened, yet. A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
> technologicla edge.

From what I see, every generation of consoles makes the PC section in the
stores smaller and smaller. I don't think anyone can deny that.

I do not think PC gaming will die, though - it might move to mostly an
online distribution of smaller titles, but it won't die.

Reply to jwb

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"steamKILLER" <sayNO2steam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117878181.584849.298790@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> again the same view which i partially agree with...
>
> article in cnet
> "Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
> By David Carnoy
> http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html
>


Thanks for the article, but don't people always say that PC gaming will die
every time a new generation of consoles come out?

Although I very much like my Xbox because it opens up new gaming doors for
me, I'm not about to give up gaming on the PC. I like real-time strategy
games and nothing beats the combo of having a keyboard and mouse for those
sorts of games. While I have adapted quite well to first person shooters
with the Xbox controller, again, the keyboard and mouse combo is still
champ.

Anyway, I don't think PC gaming will die. A lot of console games are at
least ported over to the PC. While games for the PC are not the bread and
butter of sales, it does generate some extra revenue. It's clear to see
that the PC and consoles (particularly the Xbox) are not radically different
from one another in terms of internal components. Another thing the PC has
going for it from a consumer standpoint is that games generally drop in
price more quickly than their console counterparts. Sure, you fork out
extra bucks for PC hardware, but I reckon you'll gain a lot of that money
back given the prices of PC games versus console games. Of course, that
depends on how much patience you have and how many games you buy.

At the end of the day, I like having both a console and gaming PC.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Chris B." <nospam@xyxyxy.com> wrote in message
news:oLmdnV7PWNnCMDzfRVn-gg@comcast.com...
> steamKILLER wrote:
> > x-no-archive: yes
> >
> > again the same view which i partially agree with...
> >
> > article in cnet
> > "Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
> > By David Carnoy
> > http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html
> >
> > pc games are declining and we pc gamers must stop it
> > if we still want to have pc games to play we must do our role
> > which is support the platform by all means we got
> >
> > for me the role we must play is:
> > . buy pc games for ourselves
> > . buy pc games to give as gifts to friends and family
> > . never copy pc games to others
> > . never lend pc games to others
> > . buy at least 1 pc game title a month
> > . stay exclusive and faithful to pc games and don't support
> > any kind of consoles or other gaming platforms
> > . actively fight against things that damage pc games like
> > piracy, microsoft attitude toward pc games and consoles
> >
> > support your favorite hobby! support pc games!
> > long live pc games!
> >
> > --
> > to check authenticity of the real "steamKILLER" reassure that
> > the post came from a google server and that the email address
> > is "sayNO2steam@yahoo.com"
> >
> Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
> there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
> happened, yet. A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
> technologicla edge.

Clearly however, PC gaming is on a downward slope. As the consoles grow more
powerful, and their numbers greater and greater, the impetus for a company
to release a PC game that is anything other than a console port diminishes
greatly. I don't expect the market to die entirely, but I don't expect it to
get a lot better.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

On 4 Jun 2005 04:04:31 -0700, "Peter [AGHL]" <peter.aghl@gmail.com> wrote:

>steamKILLER wrote:
>
>> again the same view which i partially agree with...
>> article in cnet
>> "Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
>> By David Carnoy
>> http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html
>>
>If I can run my precious Steam on the new Xbox 360 I might consider
>this
>But on the other hand an XBox is nothing more or less than a challenged
>PC

I don't know about that. Have you seen the specs for GPUs it has? I would
imagine you would need some kind of SLI rig to compete with that and look how
much that would set you back for just the two cards.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:10:15 -0400, "Roger Christie"
<rochrist@<REMOVETOEMAIL>charter.net> wrote:

>"Chris B." <nospam@xyxyxy.com> wrote in message
>news:oLmdnV7PWNnCMDzfRVn-gg@comcast.com...
>> steamKILLER wrote:
>> > x-no-archive: yes
>> >
>> > again the same view which i partially agree with...
>> >
>> > article in cnet
>> > "Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
>> > By David Carnoy
>> > http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html
>> >
>> > pc games are declining and we pc gamers must stop it
>> > if we still want to have pc games to play we must do our role
>> > which is support the platform by all means we got
>> >
>> > for me the role we must play is:
>> > . buy pc games for ourselves
>> > . buy pc games to give as gifts to friends and family
>> > . never copy pc games to others
>> > . never lend pc games to others
>> > . buy at least 1 pc game title a month
>> > . stay exclusive and faithful to pc games and don't support
>> > any kind of consoles or other gaming platforms
>> > . actively fight against things that damage pc games like
>> > piracy, microsoft attitude toward pc games and consoles
>> >
>> > support your favorite hobby! support pc games!
>> > long live pc games!
>> >
>> > --
>> > to check authenticity of the real "steamKILLER" reassure that
>> > the post came from a google server and that the email address
>> > is "sayNO2steam@yahoo.com"
>> >
>> Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
>> there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
>> happened, yet. A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
>> technologicla edge.
>
>Clearly however, PC gaming is on a downward slope. As the consoles grow more
>powerful, and their numbers greater and greater, the impetus for a company
>to release a PC game that is anything other than a console port diminishes
>greatly. I don't expect the market to die entirely, but I don't expect it to
>get a lot better.

I don't have a problem with that as long as the console ports don't end up
being third person platformer/action games all the time. Hopefully the console
will evolve into something more than a toy for button mashers and the
controllers will change so that the games won't be designed around it.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Chris B." <nospam@xyxyxy.com> once tried to test me with:

> Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
> there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
> happened, yet. A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
> technologicla edge.
>

Into every generation, there is a Chosen Console. It alone will stand
against the PC's, the Macintoshes, and the forces of computing. It is the
PC Slayer.

<cue up cool ass Buffy intro music>

--

Knight37 - http://knightgames.blogspot.com

Once a Slayer, Always a Slayer.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

jwb wrote:

>"Chris B." <nospam@xyxyxy.com> wrote in message
>news:oLmdnV7PWNnCMDzfRVn-gg@comcast.com...
>
>
>
>>Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
>>there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
>>happened, yet. A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
>>technologicla edge.
>>
>>
>
>From what I see, every generation of consoles makes the PC section in the
>stores smaller and smaller. I don't think anyone can deny that.
>
>

Not really. Consoles don't make the PC games fewer, the lack of decent
games does. They don't need someone else to blame for their failures,
they are cutting their own throats with lousy design, lousy
implementation, lousy service, high prices, and general
dissatisfaction. I could name half a dozen games in the last year that
I had once held high expectations for, some I beta'd, and all have
failed. I didn't buy any of them.

It's not a case of having not enough, either. Many of these failed
because they tried to have too much. I'm sorry, but the early days of
uo and quake are over, no one product can be everything to everyone,
dominate the market anymore (there being some competition now). Yet
every new game comes out trying to have everything. If they would
identify and select a reasonable target audience and serve them, they
could have their success, with a simpler development process that does
not need All Standard Features.


--
A sufficiently advanced computer network protective attitude is indistinguishable from paranoia.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

Quaestor <no.spam@my.place> once tried to test me with:

> It's not a case of having not enough, either. Many of these failed
> because they tried to have too much. I'm sorry, but the early days of
> uo and quake are over, no one product can be everything to everyone,
> dominate the market anymore (there being some competition now). Yet
> every new game comes out trying to have everything. If they would
> identify and select a reasonable target audience and serve them, they
> could have their success, with a simpler development process that does
> not need All Standard Features

I agree with you here. Why are there no more RPGs that target the core RPG
market? We all might be older now but we didn't die off (yet) and there's
still a ton of us who want party-based, turn-based RPGs with decent
graphics and most importantly a good plot and good role-play potential. But
you don't see any of that. And I could live with real-time with pause if
they want to try and do a BG2-type game. Yes, this is a niche market, but
it's a niche market starving for a good game, there's bound to be a lot of
people buy it as long as it's GOOD.

--

Knight37 - http://knightgames.blogspot.com

Once a Gamer, Always a Gamer.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

--

www.blackcatcrossing.net
"Memnoch" <memnoch@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:vup3a1p9j3an1m4fnk14vtce6i3c7g5n1m@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:10:15 -0400, "Roger Christie"
> <rochrist@<REMOVETOEMAIL>charter.net> wrote:
>
> >"Chris B." <nospam@xyxyxy.com> wrote in message
> >news:oLmdnV7PWNnCMDzfRVn-gg@comcast.com...
> >> steamKILLER wrote:
> >> > x-no-archive: yes
> >> >
> >> > again the same view which i partially agree with...
> >> >
> >> > article in cnet
> >> > "Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
> >> > By David Carnoy
> >> > http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html
> >> >
> >> > pc games are declining and we pc gamers must stop it
> >> > if we still want to have pc games to play we must do our role
> >> > which is support the platform by all means we got
> >> >
> >> > for me the role we must play is:
> >> > . buy pc games for ourselves
> >> > . buy pc games to give as gifts to friends and family
> >> > . never copy pc games to others
> >> > . never lend pc games to others
> >> > . buy at least 1 pc game title a month
> >> > . stay exclusive and faithful to pc games and don't support
> >> > any kind of consoles or other gaming platforms
> >> > . actively fight against things that damage pc games like
> >> > piracy, microsoft attitude toward pc games and consoles
> >> >
> >> > support your favorite hobby! support pc games!
> >> > long live pc games!
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > to check authenticity of the real "steamKILLER" reassure that
> >> > the post came from a google server and that the email address
> >> > is "sayNO2steam@yahoo.com"
> >> >
> >> Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
> >> there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
> >> happened, yet. A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
> >> technologicla edge.
> >
> >Clearly however, PC gaming is on a downward slope. As the consoles grow
more
> >powerful, and their numbers greater and greater, the impetus for a
company
> >to release a PC game that is anything other than a console port
diminishes
> >greatly. I don't expect the market to die entirely, but I don't expect it
to
> >get a lot better.
>
> I don't have a problem with that as long as the console ports don't end up
> being third person platformer/action games all the time. Hopefully the
console
> will evolve into something more than a toy for button mashers and the
> controllers will change so that the games won't be designed around it.

I do. Not for games that are the console's bread and butter. But for
strategy, rpg, simulations and the like, having something designed for the
console first is a major detriment. Interface issues DO matter.

I don't expeect the controllers to change significantly any time soon,
sadly.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"steamKILLER" <sayNO2steam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1117878181.584849.298790@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> again the same view which i partially agree with...
>
> article in cnet
> "Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
> By David Carnoy
> http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html
>
> pc games are declining and we pc gamers must stop it
> if we still want to have pc games to play we must do our role
> which is support the platform by all means we got
>
> for me the role we must play is:
> . buy pc games for ourselves
> . buy pc games to give as gifts to friends and family
> . never copy pc games to others
> . never lend pc games to others
> . buy at least 1 pc game title a month
> . stay exclusive and faithful to pc games and don't support
> any kind of consoles or other gaming platforms
> . actively fight against things that damage pc games like
> piracy, microsoft attitude toward pc games and consoles
>
> support your favorite hobby! support pc games!
> long live pc games!
>
> --
> to check authenticity of the real "steamKILLER" reassure that
> the post came from a google server and that the email address
> is "sayNO2steam@yahoo.com"
>
Won't steam help against PC game piracy? Being interested in CRPGs, I don't
own HL2, and I'm not intimately familiar with steam. However, it seems to
me that steam fights piracy and allows more financial rewards to go to the
developers instead of the publisher.

> . buy pc games for ourselves
AFAIK, steam allows this.

> . buy pc games to give as gifts to friends and family
AFAIK, steam allows this.

> . never copy pc games to others
AFAIK, steam attempts to enforce this. Good no?

> . never lend pc games to others
AFAIK, steam attempts to enforce this. Good no?

> support your favorite hobby! support pc games!
> long live pc games!
So, since steam seems in line with stopping pirating of PC games, what do
you have against it? If NWN/TES4 (upcoming CRPGs) came out with steam, why
should I NOT buy them, and NOT support the devlopers, who made such a large
investment in money and time?

fight4liberty



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"NightSky 421" <nightsky421@yahoo.ca> once tried to test me with:

> I have to agree. I did notice that EA's hockey games seem somewhat
> more difficult on the Xbox as opposed to the PC, but generally
> speaking, sports gaming in my experience has been a real blast on the
> Xbox. Action and fighting games are cool and I enjoy playing Knockout
> Kings 2002 on the Xbox.

I don't play sports games, but if I did, I'd play it on a console. Because
to me the only time they are fun is when you have buddies over and are all
playing against each other or in teams or sometimes co-op vs the AI. That's
where the console sports games are better, because of the better
multiplayer setup for them. I also played some sports games over the
internet on my PS2 a few times and that was much more fun than playing
against the AI opponent.

I haven't bought a sports title for the PC since Madden 98, and I'm sure
they're better now, but it always seems like the console controller is just
about perfect for sports games. Golf is one sports game on the PC though
that was always a lot of fun. The increased resolution always looks very
nice.

--

Knight37 - http://knightgames.blogspot.com

Once a Gamer, Always a Gamer.

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

On 4 Jun 2005 02:43:01 -0700, "steamKILLER" <sayNO2steam@yahoo.com>
dared speak in front of ME:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>again the same view which i partially agree with...
>
>article in cnet
>"Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
>By David Carnoy
>http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html
>
>pc games are declining and we pc gamers must stop it
>if we still want to have pc games to play we must do our role
>which is support the platform by all means we got
>
>for me the role we must play is:
>. buy pc games for ourselves
>. buy pc games to give as gifts to friends and family
>. never copy pc games to others
>. never lend pc games to others
>. buy at least 1 pc game title a month
>. stay exclusive and faithful to pc games and don't support
>any kind of consoles or other gaming platforms
>. actively fight against things that damage pc games like
>piracy, microsoft attitude toward pc games and consoles
>
>support your favorite hobby!

My hobby is gaming. Irrational loyalty to the platform rather than
the game does my hobby no favours.

--
Address no longer works.
try removing all numbers from
gafgirl1@2allstream3.net

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Reply to KAOS
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 09:35:44 -0400, Tim O <timo56@hotmail.com> dared
speak in front of ME:

>On 4 Jun 2005 02:43:01 -0700, "steamKILLER" <sayNO2steam@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>
>>article in cnet
>>"Xbox 360 and PS3: death to PC gaming?"
>>By David Carnoy
>>http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6449_7-6233821-1.html
>
>[snip]
>
>You'd have a lot of interesting posts if it wasn't for your lunatic
>commentary.

I disagree. If it weren't for the lunatic commentary, he wouldn't
have any posts at all.
--
Address no longer works.
try removing all numbers from
gafgirl1@2allstream3.net

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Reply to KAOS

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Chris B." <nospam@xyxyxy.com> wrote in message
news:oLmdnV7PWNnCMDzfRVn-gg@comcast.com...
> Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
> there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
> happened, yet. A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
> technologicla edge.

It's not just technology. If technology were the only thing driving
consoles and gaming, the Playstation and PS2 wouldn't have done so well.
The PSX was actually outdated technologically the moment it hit North
American shores, it's just the competition was nonexistant for a few
years... yet it had a long, successful life.

Now, I do have a problem with the articles contention that gaming PC's
cost 2000 dollars. Not really.. not unless you buy from Alienware, and
there's nothing particularly special about a gaming PC, other than it should
have a decent graphics card. In that "gaming PC", is going to be alot of
fluff like a big flatscreen monitor and 5-7.1 speakers, none of which is
required for PC gaming to even be enjoyable (I only use headphones or 2.1
speakers, and I bought a flatscreen monitor mostly to save power- it's not
large or expensive). OTOH, most console fanatics don't lump in that price
of that HDTV or 5.1 sound system... yet they are comparing it to similarly
"high end" PC rigs.

The real truth is that you can build a high end gaming PC for around 800
dollars or less (assuming you need a hard drive and all that other stuff,
and not just taking it from your old computer), or have somebody else build
it, somebody indepedent and not having deep advertising budgets. But most
people are unwilling to do this, and hence the ultimate problem with PC
gaming- a much smaller audience . Most Americans aren't intelligent enough,
or are to lazy to to even check the air pressure in their tires, let alone
put in a new motherboard in their PC. The console market can feed into this
relatively easy, as everything is already packaged together at a low price.

Another problem I see with PC gaming is a slow withering of PC gamings
spirit and vitality. This might actually be a side effect of the increased
popularity of consoles, though. Developers cannot afford to make risky, low
profit PC games anymore, perhaps. To be sure, developers do make alot of
games for the PC, but very often they are multi-platform affairs, ported
from the console.

I've been a long time PC gamer, but lately I'm enjoying the consoles alot
more- I own a PS2. There are some games that are clearly better on the PC,
and strategy gaming on the PC is still much better than on the consoles, but
in the end I see more and more of my gaming time going to the PS2 and not
the PC.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Roger Christie charter.net>" <rochrist@<REMOVETOEMAIL> wrote in message
news:Mfloe.48013$rt1.2991@fe04.lga...
> Clearly however, PC gaming is on a downward slope. As the consoles grow
more
> powerful, and their numbers greater and greater, the impetus for a company
> to release a PC game that is anything other than a console port diminishes
> greatly. I don't expect the market to die entirely, but I don't expect it
to
> get a lot better.

I agree. As somebody who owns both, I'm a bit sad to see the PC
declining, but OTOH I don't feel that gaming itself is in peril. One thing
I would like to see is PC developers focus on games that show the PC's
strengths, and not simply ape consoles. That means games oriented towards
more niche audiences. It's a real pitty that Microsoft, for instance,
cancelled Train Simulator 2. That's a game that really would never sell on
consoles, but would have alot of fans on the PC. Likewise, simulators of
all kinds, first person action games, and strategy games should all have
increased emphasis on the PC by developers.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

The next XBox 360 is definitely going to be a step away from the PC. It
won't have an internal hard drive, for instance. The processor is also
more akin to something in a Mac than a PC. Rumor has it that Sony's PS3
also won't have an internal hard drive.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Chris B." <nospam@xyxyxy.com> wrote:


>Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
>there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
>happened, yet.

Saying that something hasn't happened before, and therefore will not
happen, is not a cogent argument.

>A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
>technologicla edge.

Nope, will take much longer this time. There has never been a
technological leap of this much power difference from one generation
of consoles to the next. Not only that but the former advantages of PC
(high resolution, mouse and keyboard support) will no longer exist.

Joe

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

Knight37 <knight37m@gmail.com> wrote:

>I agree with you here. Why are there no more RPGs that target the core RPG
>market? We all might be older now but we didn't die off (yet) and there's
>still a ton of us who want party-based, turn-based RPGs with decent
>graphics and most importantly a good plot and good role-play potential.

Because PC gamers also demand cutting-edge graphics that fully utilize
their high-end rigs. That costs money. The games cost $5 - $10 million
to make. So smaller genres like RPG don't get made as much. (This
isn't just a PC phenomenon though, consoles have the same problem.)

Joe

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

Memnoch <memnoch@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote:

>I don't have a problem with that as long as the console ports don't end up
>being third person platformer/action games all the time. Hopefully the console
>will evolve into something more than a toy for button mashers and the
>controllers will change so that the games won't be designed around it.

Valid points. I hear the XBox 360 will support wireless mouse/keyboard
out of the box, so hopefully at least FPS games and MMOs and such will
play better.

Joe

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 06:46:31 GMT, Joe62 <NOSPAMjmcginn@shaw.ca> wrote:

>Memnoch <memnoch@nospampleaseimbritish.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>>I don't have a problem with that as long as the console ports don't end up
>>being third person platformer/action games all the time. Hopefully the console
>>will evolve into something more than a toy for button mashers and the
>>controllers will change so that the games won't be designed around it.
>
>Valid points. I hear the XBox 360 will support wireless mouse/keyboard
>out of the box, so hopefully at least FPS games and MMOs and such will
>play better.

And maybe, just maybe we will get a better crop of ported games. I just want
to see an end of these games where you can just look at the interface and tell
what its orgins were.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Joe62" <NOSPAMjmcginn@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:4a85a1h4iik7bcq1ht815hcrceugvavek0@4ax.com
> "Chris B." <nospam@xyxyxy.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
>> there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
>> happened, yet.
>
> Saying that something hasn't happened before, and therefore will not
> happen, is not a cogent argument.
>
>> A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
>> technologicla edge.
>
> Nope, will take much longer this time. There has never been a
> technological leap of this much power difference from one generation
> of consoles to the next. Not only that but the former advantages of PC
> (high resolution, mouse and keyboard support) will no longer exist.
>
> Joe

Sitting here, blinking, looking in amazement at that statement....on an
19" LCD monitor in 1280x1024 plugged into the DVI port of a GF6800GT.
As good as all those HDTV's look at Circuit City there is not a one of
them that come close to the image quality of this PC. The PC does
enjoy one advantage no console can claim yet: pure versatility.
McG.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

In article <11a3uchc9vth920@news.supernews.com>,
Quaestor <no.spam@my.place> wrote:
>jwb wrote:
>
>>"Chris B." <nospam@xyxyxy.com> wrote in message
>>news:oLmdnV7PWNnCMDzfRVn-gg@comcast.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>>Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
>>>there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
>>>happened, yet. A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
>>>technologicla edge.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>From what I see, every generation of consoles makes the PC section in the
>>stores smaller and smaller. I don't think anyone can deny that.
>>
>>
>
>Not really. Consoles don't make the PC games fewer, the lack of decent
>games does. They don't need someone else to blame for their failures,
>they are cutting their own throats with lousy design, lousy
>implementation, lousy service, high prices, and general
>dissatisfaction. I could name half a dozen games in the last year that
>I had once held high expectations for, some I beta'd, and all have
>failed. I didn't buy any of them.
>
>It's not a case of having not enough, either. Many of these failed
>because they tried to have too much. I'm sorry, but the early days of
>uo and quake are over, no one product can be everything to everyone,
>dominate the market anymore (there being some competition now). Yet
>every new game comes out trying to have everything. If they would
>identify and select a reasonable target audience and serve them, they
>could have their success, with a simpler development process that does
>not need All Standard Features.

Features have always been a problem in OS development, too.
You can't implement everything and have to choose. It appears
that games people tried to satify all complaints. I've
noticed that gamers here have to have graphics (not the old
styles), sounds, romances, personalities in each
character, and other unbelievable demands. IOW, you stopped
wanting an RPG and wanted a soap opera that allowed you to
be a virtual character. The product morphed into something
that is not an RPG but an interactive movie, Hollywood style.

/BAH

Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

Magnulus wrote:
>
> Now, I do have a problem with the articles contention that gaming
> PC's cost 2000 dollars. Not really.. not unless you buy from
> Alienware, and there's nothing particularly special about a gaming
> PC, other than it should have a decent graphics card. In that
> "gaming PC", is going to be alot of fluff like a big flatscreen
> monitor and 5-7.1 speakers, none of which is required for PC gaming
> to even be enjoyable (I only use headphones or 2.1 speakers, and I
> bought a flatscreen monitor mostly to save power- it's not large or
> expensive). OTOH, most console fanatics don't lump in that price of
> that HDTV or 5.1 sound system... yet they are comparing it to
> similarly "high end" PC rigs.
>
> The real truth is that you can build a high end gaming PC for
> around 800 dollars or less (assuming you need a hard drive and all
> that other stuff, and not just taking it from your old computer

....and your $800 will buy you a lot more in June 2006. The author seems to
be making no allowance for this and comparing today's PC with a Console that
comes out in a year.

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

Joe62 wrote:
> "Chris B." <nospam@xyxyxy.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember 3DO?),
>>there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise. Hasn't
>>happened, yet.
>
>
> Saying that something hasn't happened before, and therefore will not
> happen, is not a cogent argument.
>
>
>>A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
>>technologicla edge.
>
>
> Nope, will take much longer this time. There has never been a
> technological leap of this much power difference from one generation
> of consoles to the next. Not only that but the former advantages of PC
> (high resolution, mouse and keyboard support) will no longer exist.
>
And the main advantage IMHO will still exsit i.e. the range of games are
just much better on a PC.

> Joe

Reply to Jab
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

Angof wrote:
> Magnulus wrote:
>
>> Now, I do have a problem with the articles contention that gaming
>>PC's cost 2000 dollars. Not really.. not unless you buy from
>>Alienware, and there's nothing particularly special about a gaming
>>PC, other than it should have a decent graphics card. In that
>>"gaming PC", is going to be alot of fluff like a big flatscreen
>>monitor and 5-7.1 speakers, none of which is required for PC gaming
>>to even be enjoyable (I only use headphones or 2.1 speakers, and I
>>bought a flatscreen monitor mostly to save power- it's not large or
>>expensive). OTOH, most console fanatics don't lump in that price of
>>that HDTV or 5.1 sound system... yet they are comparing it to
>>similarly "high end" PC rigs.
>>
>> The real truth is that you can build a high end gaming PC for
>>around 800 dollars or less (assuming you need a hard drive and all
>>that other stuff, and not just taking it from your old computer
>
>
> ...and your $800 will buy you a lot more in June 2006. The author seems to
> be making no allowance for this and comparing today's PC with a Console that
> comes out in a year.
>
>

Be a bit of a boring article then wouldn't it. Has all the hallmarks of
deceide the headline then find the 'facts' that support it.

Reply to Jab

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

JAB wrote:
> Joe62 wrote:
>> "Chris B." <nospam@xyxyxy.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Everytime a new generation of consoles arrive (anyone remember
>>> 3DO?), there have always been the prediction of pc gaming's demise.
>>> Hasn't happened, yet.
>>
>>
>> Saying that something hasn't happened before, and therefore will not
>> happen, is not a cogent argument.
>>
>>
>>> A month after the new XBox is out, PC's will regain the
>>> technologicla edge.
>>
>>
>> Nope, will take much longer this time. There has never been a
>> technological leap of this much power difference from one generation
>> of consoles to the next. Not only that but the former advantages of
>> PC (high resolution, mouse and keyboard support) will no longer
>> exist.
>>
> And the main advantage IMHO will still exsit i.e. the range of games
> are just much better on a PC.
>
>> Joe

I just think they are two different markets and will continue to be so.
There are also interesting developments in PC gear happening. Here's an
example.

http://hardware.gamespot.com/Story-ST-x-1610-x-x-x

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Magnulus" <magnulus@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Rumor has it that Sony's PS3
>also won't have an internal hard drive.

Latest rumors I've heard are the reverse - that both consoles will
ship with hard-drives. The XBox 360 has to in fact, since they've
promised backwards compatibility.

Joe

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

Memnoch wrote:
>
> I don't know about that. Have you seen the specs for GPUs it has? I would
> imagine you would need some kind of SLI rig to compete with that and look how
> much that would set you back for just the two cards.

I don't expect to have a state of the art GPU in a console thing
How many months do we have after the HW design is settled and the
console hits the streets?
More than a few months in my opinion
With the rate of new videocards from both ATI and Nvidia I'll expect no
more than a year before high end gaming rigs is well ahead of any
console

>From the linked article
"if next-generation consoles represent the best that Nvidia and ATI can
do at the time when those consoles launch, you'll still be able to
count on PC hardware surpassing the PS3 and the Xbox 360 within a few
years."

Considering that the top end cards of today costs way more than a
console :)

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

On Sun, 05 Jun 05 11:15:09 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote in message
<-7mdnfnoz_MsYT_fRVn-gg@rcn.net>:

>Features have always been a problem in OS development, too.
>You can't implement everything and have to choose. It appears
>that games people tried to satify all complaints. I've
>noticed that gamers here have to have graphics (not the old
>styles), sounds, romances, personalities in each
>character, and other unbelievable demands. IOW, you stopped
>wanting an RPG and wanted a soap opera that allowed you to
>be a virtual character. The product morphed into something
>that is not an RPG but an interactive movie, Hollywood style.

Those things you listed -- sounds, romances, and individual character
personalities are all things present in a real RPG. That is, a
honest-to-goodness pen and paper RPG with real people. For those who
have played real RPGs with real live people (*gasp*) it's simply a
matter of available computer technology finally being able to catch up
somewhat with the real thing.

It's not that some players "stopped wanting an RPG" but rather they've
always wanted more than what the past technological limitations of the
CRPG could give them.

Of course, it's unfortunate that the market for CRPGs has never been
large, and that its commercial viability may very well die before
technology finally can catch up with providing a good approximation of a
real pen and paper game.


--
A: Because it disturbs the logical flow of a message.
Q: Why is top posting a sloppy form of writing?

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

On 5 Jun 2005 09:56:39 -0700, "Peter [AGHL]" <peter.aghl@gmail.com> wrote:

>Memnoch wrote:
>>
>> I don't know about that. Have you seen the specs for GPUs it has? I would
>> imagine you would need some kind of SLI rig to compete with that and look how
>> much that would set you back for just the two cards.
>
>I don't expect to have a state of the art GPU in a console thing
>How many months do we have after the HW design is settled and the
>console hits the streets?
>More than a few months in my opinion
>With the rate of new videocards from both ATI and Nvidia I'll expect no
>more than a year before high end gaming rigs is well ahead of any
>console

Yep, they always have in the past and I expect they always will. ATI will
eventually release a desktop variant of the card that XBox 360 has and next
evolutionary cycle will have begun again.

>>From the linked article
>"if next-generation consoles represent the best that Nvidia and ATI can
>do at the time when those consoles launch, you'll still be able to
>count on PC hardware surpassing the PS3 and the Xbox 360 within a few
>years."
>
>Considering that the top end cards of today costs way more than a
>console :)

Exactly. If the specs on paper actually give the performance they suggest I
don't think there is a PC card out there right now except maybe a dual SLI
setup that could compare. I've yet to see some direct comparisons of its
hardware to any PC configuration though so it's hard to say for sure.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

Memnoch wrote:

> If the specs on paper actually give the performance they suggest I
> don't think there is a PC card out there right now except maybe a
> dual SLI setup that could compare.

http://www.xbox.com/en-US/xbox360/factsheet.htm
Hmm
10Mb embedded RAM compared to 256Mb on eg ATI X850
And the XBox comes with only 512Mb memory

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Peter [AGHL]" <peter.aghl@gmail.com> once tried to test me with:

>
> Memnoch wrote:
>
>> If the specs on paper actually give the performance they suggest I
>> don't think there is a PC card out there right now except maybe a
>> dual SLI setup that could compare.
>
> http://www.xbox.com/en-US/xbox360/factsheet.htm
> Hmm 10Mb embedded RAM compared to 256Mb on eg ATI X850
> And the XBox comes with only 512Mb memory

But the difference is that the video processor on the 360 doesn't have a
make a trip on a slow bus to access system ram, it has a direct link to the
very fast 512mb ram main memory. Also the xbox doesn't need as much system
ram as a PC because it doesn't have a full-os operating with all the
services and resident programs running in the background like the PC has.
The game gets the full 512mb for itself. And of course, since it has a hard
drive, it can use HD space to page out things it doesn't need immediately.

I fully expect the 360 games to look phenomenal and do some amazing things,
for the first 2 years. But by then most PC gamers will have systems that
are equivalent or not much different and we'll be back to consoles not
really having any advantage over PC's. And no, it will not be the death of
PC gaming.

--

Knight37 - http://knightgames.blogspot.com

Once a Gamer, Always a Gamer.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

Knight37 wrote:
>
> But the difference is that the video processor on the 360
> doesn't have a make a trip on a slow bus to access system
> ram, it has a direct link to the very fast 512mb ram main
> memory.

True the busspeed has improved
But compared to the internal busspeed on a X850?

> Also the xbox doesn't need as much system ram as a PC because
> it doesn't have a full-os operating with all the services and
> resident programs running in the background like the PC has.

Knight37 wrote:
>
> But the difference is that the video processor on the 360
> doesn't have a make a trip on a slow bus to access system
> ram, it has a direct link to the very fast 512mb ram main
> memory.

True the busspeed has improved
But compared to the internal busspeed on a X850?

> Also the xbox doesn't need as much system ram as a PC because
> it doesn't have a full-os operating with all the services and
> resident programs running in the background like the PC has.

Hehe, we are talking about MS here and a gaming rig with bluetooth,
wlan and lan capabillities
You'll probably find firewall and av systems running on the this system

> The game gets the full 512mb for itself. And of course, since it has a hard
> drive, it can use HD space to page out things it doesn't need immediately.
>
HD trashing is the most significant problem in todays PC's
Only solution is to add more physiscal memory

> I fully expect the 360 games to look phenomenal and do some amazing things,
> for the first 2 years.

Depends a little on when the new XBox will hit the streets and what
AMD, Intel, ATI, NVidia comes up with in the mean time
I don't expect they will sit tight and wait for the XBox
I am sure they have something to up the sales for the PC market when PC
gamers demands improvement.... :-)

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

On Sun, 05 Jun 05 11:15:09 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com dared speak in front
of ME:

>Features have always been a problem in OS development, too.
>You can't implement everything and have to choose. It appears
>that games people tried to satify all complaints. I've
>noticed that gamers here have to have graphics (not the old
>styles), sounds, romances, personalities in each
>character, and other unbelievable demands. IOW, you stopped
>wanting an RPG and wanted a soap opera that allowed you to
>be a virtual character. The product morphed into something
>that is not an RPG but an interactive movie, Hollywood style.

IOW, something more akin to a P&P RPG with pictures than an action
game with character development. Your point would have made more
sense if you'd remembered to stick the "C" in front of RPG.

--
Address no longer works.
try removing all numbers from
gafgirl1@2allstream3.net

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Reply to KAOS

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Joe62" <NOSPAMjmcginn@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:27c6a1lddlncu8mtoki6n51csqscnfdmo2@4ax.com...
> Latest rumors I've heard are the reverse - that both consoles will
> ship with hard-drives. The XBox 360 has to in fact, since they've
> promised backwards compatibility.

On a limited number of titles, I'd expect. They are going to have to
figure out wrappers for some of the games. I know from experience alot of
those XBox ported games on the PC had alot of trouble running on ATI
hardware. Also, the games kernels will have to be recompiled- the old X86
Celeron in the XBox is a different processor from the PowerPC in the newer
consoles. OTOH, the PS3 will get around this by having almot all the
hardware that matters from the PS2 and Playstation, meaning very little will
be emulated.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

In article <7aj6a15c5gpkrmvtk8g0760os81q8j4q1n@news>,
Paul Angstrom <angstrom@go.away.spammers.invalid> wrote:
>On Sun, 05 Jun 05 11:15:09 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote in message
><-7mdnfnoz_MsYT_fRVn-gg@rcn.net>:
>
>>Features have always been a problem in OS development, too.
>>You can't implement everything and have to choose. It appears
>>that games people tried to satify all complaints. I've
>>noticed that gamers here have to have graphics (not the old
>>styles), sounds, romances, personalities in each
>>character, and other unbelievable demands. IOW, you stopped
>>wanting an RPG and wanted a soap opera that allowed you to
>>be a virtual character. The product morphed into something
>>that is not an RPG but an interactive movie, Hollywood style.
>
>Those things you listed -- sounds, romances, and individual character
>personalities are all things present in a real RPG. That is, a
>honest-to-goodness pen and paper RPG with real people. For those who
>have played real RPGs with real live people (*gasp*) it's simply a
>matter of available computer technology finally being able to catch up
>somewhat with the real thing.
>
>It's not that some players "stopped wanting an RPG" but rather they've
>always wanted more than what the past technological limitations of the
>CRPG could give them.

Now that tech is catching up, it sounds like you want a Reality
show. That's not my idea of a game. A game is series of logistic
problems to solve.
>
>Of course, it's unfortunate that the market for CRPGs has never been
>large, and that its commercial viability may very well die before
>technology finally can catch up with providing a good approximation of a
>real pen and paper game.

One of the reasons I like playing the games is to not have
to deal with Real Situations. I step out of the house at
any time to get that activity.

/BAH


Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

In article <8jt7a1t2lu7ujbt4td4ul20504kuvq9li0@4ax.com>,
Kaos <kaos@invalid.xplornet.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 05 Jun 05 11:15:09 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com dared speak in front
>of ME:
>
>>Features have always been a problem in OS development, too.
>>You can't implement everything and have to choose. It appears
>>that games people tried to satify all complaints. I've
>>noticed that gamers here have to have graphics (not the old
>>styles), sounds, romances, personalities in each
>>character, and other unbelievable demands. IOW, you stopped
>>wanting an RPG and wanted a soap opera that allowed you to
>>be a virtual character. The product morphed into something
>>that is not an RPG but an interactive movie, Hollywood style.
>
>IOW, something more akin to a P&P RPG with pictures than an action
>game with character development. Your point would have made more
>sense if you'd remembered to stick the "C" in front of RPG.

Sorry. I actually don't care if I get pictures but then I
started playing when there weren't any pictures and I had
to imagine what things looked like. The puzzles and the mapping
of the game was the fun.

/BAH


Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

In article <aabpe.55192$8S5.6017@bignews3.bellsouth.net>,
"Magnulus" <magnulus@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>"Joe62" <NOSPAMjmcginn@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>news:27c6a1lddlncu8mtoki6n51csqscnfdmo2@4ax.com...
>> Latest rumors I've heard are the reverse - that both consoles will
>> ship with hard-drives. The XBox 360 has to in fact, since they've
>> promised backwards compatibility.
>
> On a limited number of titles, I'd expect. They are going to have to
>figure out wrappers for some of the games. I know from experience alot
of
>those XBox ported games on the PC had alot of trouble running on ATI
>hardware. Also, the games kernels will have to be recompiled- the old X86
>Celeron in the XBox is a different processor from the PowerPC in the newer
>consoles.

They should not have to be recompiled. Note that I said _sh_ouldn't.

<snip>

/BAH

Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Angof" <Mailfalger1@yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in message
news:42a31b24$0$25433$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
>
> ...and your $800 will buy you a lot more in June 2006. The author seems to
> be making no allowance for this and comparing today's PC with a Console
that
> comes out in a year.
>


Indeed...my experience over the years has always been that the actual number
of dollars you spend on a PC never changes, but the amount of hardware bang
that you get for that money only gets better as time goes on. Of course,
that is to say that you can expect to spend the same amount of money on a
low-end, mid-range, or high-end PC now as you will a few years from now.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Magnulus" <magnulus@bellsouth.net> once tried to test me with:

> On a limited number of titles, I'd expect. They are going to have to
> figure out wrappers for some of the games. I know from experience
> alot of those XBox ported games on the PC had alot of trouble running
> on ATI hardware. Also, the games kernels will have to be recompiled-
> the old X86 Celeron in the XBox is a different processor from the
> PowerPC in the newer consoles. OTOH, the PS3 will get around this by
> having almot all the hardware that matters from the PS2 and
> Playstation, meaning very little will be emulated.
>

No, that's not how it's going to work. They are going to EMULATE the Xbox
hardware. It's no different than running an SNES emulator on a PC. They're
banking on the Xbox 360 being powerful enough to be able to emulate the
lower-end original Xbox hardware and still get decent frame rates. The
games that don't work will be because they do something "flakey" that's
hard for the emulation software to do. And of course, bugs in the emulator
that cause certain titles to not work right.

They shouldn't need to recompile any of the games, that's not emulation,
that's a rewrite, and the only way that would work is if they had newly
compiled versions of the xbox games pre-loaded on the 360's hard disk and
they just use your xbox DVD for game data (art files, sound, mapping info,
etc.) That's a possibility I guess, but that is not what Microsoft has been
saying as far as how they would provide the compatibility.

--

Knight37 - http://knightgames.blogspot.com

Once a Gamer, Always a Gamer.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"NightSky 421" <nightsky421@yahoo.ca> once tried to test me with:

> Indeed...my experience over the years has always been that the actual
> number of dollars you spend on a PC never changes, but the amount of
> hardware bang that you get for that money only gets better as time
> goes on. Of course, that is to say that you can expect to spend the
> same amount of money on a low-end, mid-range, or high-end PC now as
> you will a few years from now.

Actually it's getting cheaper all around. You can get almost top-end PC's
now for the price a mid-range PC would have cost you several years ago.

--

Knight37 - http://knightgames.blogspot.com

Once a Gamer, Always a Gamer.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

"Knight37" <knight37m@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns966EB57A4A4F8knight37m@130.133.1.4...
>
> Actually it's getting cheaper all around. You can get almost top-end PC's
> now for the price a mid-range PC would have cost you several years ago.
>


It may have come down a tiny bit, but not nearly enough for me to notice. I
look at prices from the turn of the century (I kept a scrapbook) and I don't
see much change at all at any tier. In fact, on the high-end of video
cards, things may well have gone up a little bit since then. On the other
side of things, high-end processors have gone down a touch. Mind you, it
could be that I live in Canada! :-)

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic,alt.games.half-life (More info?)

 

On Tue, 07 Jun 05 11:36:17 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com dared speak in front
of ME:

>In article <8jt7a1t2lu7ujbt4td4ul20504kuvq9li0@4ax.com>,
> Kaos <kaos@invalid.xplornet.com> wrote:
>>On Sun, 05 Jun 05 11:15:09 GMT, jmfbahciv@aol.com dared speak in front
>>of ME:
>>
>>>Features have always been a problem in OS development, too.
>>>You can't implement everything and have to choose. It appears
>>>that games people tried to satify all complaints. I've
>>>noticed that gamers here have to have graphics (not the old
>>>styles), sounds, romances, personalities in each
>>>character, and other unbelievable demands. IOW, you stopped
>>>wanting an RPG and wanted a soap opera that allowed you to
>>>be a virtual character. The product morphed into something
>>>that is not an RPG but an interactive movie, Hollywood style.
>>
>>IOW, something more akin to a P&P RPG with pictures than an action
>>game with character development. Your point would have made more
>>sense if you'd remembered to stick the "C" in front of RPG.
>
>Sorry. I actually don't care if I get pictures but then I
>started playing when there weren't any pictures and I had
>to imagine what things looked like. The puzzles and the mapping
>of the game was the fun.

Meh. Pictures, sounds and convenience are just the one thing a CRPG
does better than a tabletop RPG. That's only preamble for my point,
though - which was that the other demands (especially for personality)
are just an attempt to bring the CRPG closer to the tabletop RPG.

--
Address no longer works.
try removing all numbers from
gafgirl1@2allstream3.net

--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Reply to KAOS
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > Games General Discussions > another article saying pc games are at risk
Go to:

There are 1074 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
  • 04:06 xyz001 won the Sophmore badge
  • 01:00 scione won the Freshman badge
  • 01:32 aford10 won the Home Brew badge
  • 01:00 Kevinator won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 adis won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 dabell won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 zebo56 won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 drkkmittal won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 jakesvdyk won the Uniformed badge
  • 01:00 artistjane won the Uniformed badge