Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
I'm working with a bunch of VHS tapes and the quality is all over the
map, does anyone have the Canopus ADVC-300 and can vouch for it's
ability to "clean up" old tapes? Is it really worth the extra $300ish???
2ndly, I know MacroVision can be defeated with the ADVC-100, and I
understand it can also be done in conjunction with a cheap Picture
Stabilizer such as this:
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
"Roy Lunn" <roylunn@well.com> wrote in message
news:emThc.21$vS4.31052@news.uswest.net...
> I'm working with a bunch of VHS tapes and the quality is all over the
> map, does anyone have the Canopus ADVC-300 and can vouch for it's
> ability to "clean up" old tapes? Is it really worth the extra $300ish???
>
> 2ndly, I know MacroVision can be defeated with the ADVC-100, and I
> understand it can also be done in conjunction with a cheap Picture
> Stabilizer such as this:
>
> http://shop.store.yahoo.com/direct/dvdvidstab.html >
> Does it work? I have only 2 tapes with this problem, so can I use the
> ADVC-300 with this above product and still get good picture quality?
>
I'll answer your comment by a not quite direct answer:
I have the ADVC-300 and KNOW that it is the best analog-DV converter
that I have. The noise reduction/enhancement modes are useful, but not
total panaceas. If you choose to use the NR modes, use them on the lowest
noise reduction levels.
All in all, the ADVC-300 seems to make my DV25 results look somewhere
between what I have normally expected from DV25 and what I normally
get from DV50.
Is the ADVC-300 perfect? No. Is the noise reduction fully transparent?
No.
Does the noise reduction and DV encoding work (and work very well)? Yes.
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
"John Dyson" <dyson@iquest.net> wrote:
> > Does it work? I have only 2 tapes with this problem, so can I use the
> > ADVC-300 with this above product and still get good picture quality?
> >
> I'll answer your comment by a not quite direct answer:
>
> I have the ADVC-300 and KNOW that it is the best analog-DV converter
> that I have. The noise reduction/enhancement modes are useful, but not
> total panaceas. If you choose to use the NR modes, use them on the lowest
> noise reduction levels.
>
> All in all, the ADVC-300 seems to make my DV25 results look somewhere
> between what I have normally expected from DV25 and what I normally
> get from DV50.
>
> Is the ADVC-300 perfect? No. Is the noise reduction fully transparent?
> No.
> Does the noise reduction and DV encoding work (and work very well)? Yes.
john, thanks for the response, i bit the bullet and ordered the $449
advc device this afternoon... i'll use your advice and use the lowest
settings for noise... i'm still confused on all the 3D y/c reduction,
etc but i'm sure i'll figure it out...
glad you said it was the best, i've seen that posted several places but
i got burned on the pyro a/v link (dropped frames!!!) so i'm still
hurting...
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
I just bought an ADVC300 a few weeks ago. So far I'm pleased with the
results. Better than I expected. I'm a newbie to NLE and video editing
altogether and I'm using the default ADVC300 settings. BTW, the 300 does
NOT defeat Macrovision in any way. The 100 will, but you get a better
product in the 300. Good luck with it.
--
Tony
"Roy Lunn" <roylunn@well.com> wrote in message
news:emThc.21$vS4.31052@news.uswest.net...
> I'm working with a bunch of VHS tapes and the quality is all over the
> map, does anyone have the Canopus ADVC-300 and can vouch for it's
> ability to "clean up" old tapes? Is it really worth the extra $300ish???
>
> 2ndly, I know MacroVision can be defeated with the ADVC-100, and I
> understand it can also be done in conjunction with a cheap Picture
> Stabilizer such as this:
>
> http://shop.store.yahoo.com/direct/dvdvidstab.html >
> Does it work? I have only 2 tapes with this problem, so can I use the
> ADVC-300 with this above product and still get good picture quality?
>
> Please advise...
>
> Thanks!!!
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:34:00 -0600, Roy Lunn <roylunn@well.com> wrote:
>I'm working with a bunch of VHS tapes and the quality is all over the
>map, does anyone have the Canopus ADVC-300 and can vouch for it's
>ability to "clean up" old tapes? Is it really worth the extra $300ish???
>
>2ndly, I know MacroVision can be defeated with the ADVC-100, and I
>understand it can also be done in conjunction with a cheap Picture
>Stabilizer such as this:
>
>http://shop.store.yahoo.com/direct/dvdvidstab.html
>
>Does it work? I have only 2 tapes with this problem, so can I use the
>ADVC-300 with this above product and still get good picture quality?
>
>Please advise...
>
>Thanks!!!
In order to defeat Macro vision I use the SIMA Color Corrector
Pro-Series Model SCC.
It not only took care of the Macro Vision problem but also allows for
correction of Tint,Color,Sharpness,Brightness,Contrast,Blue, Green and
Red.
I paid about $79.00 ... I use it to transfer old VHS movies to
DVD...works like a charm for me...
Glenn M
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Glenn M <> wrote:
> In order to defeat Macro vision I use the SIMA Color Corrector
> Pro-Series Model SCC.
> It not only took care of the Macro Vision problem but also allows for
> correction of Tint,Color,Sharpness,Brightness,Contrast,Blue, Green and
> Red.
> I paid about $79.00 ... I use it to transfer old VHS movies to
> DVD...works like a charm for me...
> Glenn M
thanks for the response, forgot about the sima device... i went ahead
and ordered the little video stablizer, if it works or doesn't work,
i'll post the news... i may get the sima color corrector also...
and to tony s... also thanks, i should have my ADVC-300 tuesday... can't
wait to see what it does... my tapes are good, bad and horrible... so if
it works well, i'll let everyone know...
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
It turns out that you can just use your old camcorder!
They all have the same resolution!!!
"JasonC" <jchannin@nospam.tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:7122bee5896f3589229fd0b6ee754677@localhost.talkaboutvideo.com...
> Roy:
> I've been shopping for that aDVc-300 for several evenings, and the lowest
> I can find it listed is $479.
>
> Sure would appreciate you posting where you found a $449 price.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Thank you for explaining things agiain
Richard Crowley" <rcrowley7@xprt.net> wrote in message
news:109op599ubec90d@corp.supernews.com...
> "Americhicken" wrote ...
> > It turns out that you can just use your old camcorder!
> > They all have the same resolution!!!
>
> Mr. Chicken appears to be fixated on "resolution". When
> he gets some more experience, he will grow out of it.
>
>
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
The chicken has a point.
And please stop top-posting.
"Americhicken" <Americhicken@nstoekr_td.com> wrote in message
newsfmdnfx7pqQj8gHdRVn-jg@comcast.com...
> Thank you for explaining things agiain
>
> Richard Crowley" <rcrowley7@xprt.net> wrote in message
> news:109op599ubec90d@corp.supernews.com...
> > "Americhicken" wrote ...
> > > It turns out that you can just use your old camcorder!
> > > They all have the same resolution!!!
> >
> > Mr. Chicken appears to be fixated on "resolution". When
> > he gets some more experience, he will grow out of it.
> >
> >
>
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.