Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
I took a small AVI file into Dynalpel's Steadyhand & processed it. The new
file that was produced is 8 times as large as the original. I expected the
new file to be exactly the same size as the original. What codec should I
have used?
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 13:58:33 +0800, "Videot" <videot@optusnet.com.au>
wrote:
>I took a small AVI file into Dynalpel's Steadyhand & processed it. The new
>file that was produced is 8 times as large as the original. I expected the
>new file to be exactly the same size as the original.
You would get a similar size if you encode it with the same codec
_and_ settings. Not really the same size exactly, as the content has
been changed para Steadyhand.
>What codec should I
>have used?
What codec do you like most? You can use _any_ codec, so what is the
clip meant for?
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Videot wrote:
>
> I took a small AVI file into Dynalpel's Steadyhand & processed it.
> The new file that was produced is 8 times as large as the original.
> I expected the new file to be exactly the same size as the original.
> What codec should I have used?
>
mpeg1 for compatibility, or
Xvid for small file size
--
if I haven't given a url with my answer, try typing the keywords into
google.com
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
I want the resulting file to be the same size & format as the original.
"PerthMETRO.net" <email -at- perthmetro -dot- net> wrote in message
news:Usenet.rndtheqj@localhost...
> Videot wrote:
> >
> > I took a small AVI file into Dynalpel's Steadyhand & processed it.
> > The new file that was produced is 8 times as large as the original.
> > I expected the new file to be exactly the same size as the original.
> > What codec should I have used?
> >
>
> mpeg1 for compatibility, or
> Xvid for small file size
> --
>
> if I haven't given a url with my answer, try typing the keywords into
> google.com
>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.