3ccd cameras

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

are they a lot better, I see Panasonic have a few models out with a leica
lens.
thanks
Rob.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

"Your-Nice" <Your-Nice@ntlworld.com> a écrit dans le message news:
r_TPc.1232$qU2.799@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
> are they a lot better, I see Panasonic have a few models out with a leica
> lens.
> thanks
> Rob.
>
> Yes they are better. Just tested the Panasonic NV-GS200 great ! (almost
as good as the old Sony 900 Or Pana MX300), and cheap ! IMHO a best buy
actually

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

might have to treat myself then, thanks

"Jacques Ciana" <jciana@pasdespambluewin.ch> wrote in message
news:41111289$1_3@news.bluewin.ch...
>
> "Your-Nice" <Your-Nice@ntlworld.com> a écrit dans le message news:
> r_TPc.1232$qU2.799@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
> > are they a lot better, I see Panasonic have a few models out with a
leica
> > lens.
> > thanks
> > Rob.
> >
> > Yes they are better. Just tested the Panasonic NV-GS200 great ! (almost
> as good as the old Sony 900 Or Pana MX300), and cheap ! IMHO a best buy
> actually
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

Don't kid yourself, the GS200 is nowhere near a TRV900 in quality.

Note that the Panasonic DV953 (a 3-CCD model up from the GS200) was rated
mid-pack by Consumer Reports in 11/03 with a lot of 1-CCD cameras, including
Panasonic models above it, including a $500 list Sony Digital8 camera..

Not to say it is a bad camera, just unexceptional at its price.

- GRL

"Jacques Ciana" <jciana@pasdespambluewin.ch> wrote in message
news:41111289$1_3@news.bluewin.ch...
>
> "Your-Nice" <Your-Nice@ntlworld.com> a écrit dans le message news:
> r_TPc.1232$qU2.799@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
> > are they a lot better, I see Panasonic have a few models out with a
leica
> > lens.
> > thanks
> > Rob.
> >
> > Yes they are better. Just tested the Panasonic NV-GS200 great ! (almost
> as good as the old Sony 900 Or Pana MX300), and cheap ! IMHO a best buy
> actually
>
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

Hi

Check out my reviews of 3 CCD cameras here:
http://www.desktop-video-guide.com/top-10-digital-camcorders-under600-review.html

Best Regards
Gary Hendricks
www.desktop-video-guide.com


"GRL" <GLitwinski@CHARTERMI.NET> wrote in message news:<10k4lb3s7j7qk07@corp.supernews.com>...
> Don't kid yourself, the GS200 is nowhere near a TRV900 in quality.
>
> Note that the Panasonic DV953 (a 3-CCD model up from the GS200) was rated
> mid-pack by Consumer Reports in 11/03 with a lot of 1-CCD cameras, including
> Panasonic models above it, including a $500 list Sony Digital8 camera..
>
> Not to say it is a bad camera, just unexceptional at its price.
>
> - GRL
>
> "Jacques Ciana" <jciana@pasdespambluewin.ch> wrote in message
> news:41111289$1_3@news.bluewin.ch...
> >
> > "Your-Nice" <Your-Nice@ntlworld.com> a écrit dans le message news:
> > r_TPc.1232$qU2.799@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
> > > are they a lot better, I see Panasonic have a few models out with a
> leica
> > > lens.
> > > thanks
> > > Rob.
> > >
> > > Yes they are better. Just tested the Panasonic NV-GS200 great ! (almost
> > as good as the old Sony 900 Or Pana MX300), and cheap ! IMHO a best buy
> > actually
> >
> >

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)

"Gary Hendricks" <gary_hendricks@digital-music-guide.com> wrote in message
news:aae850b5.0409111004.36b61aa5@posting.google.com...
> Hi
>
> Check out my reviews of 3 CCD cameras here:
>
http://www.desktop-video-guide.com/top-10-digital-camcorders-under600-review.html
>
> Best Regards
> Gary Hendricks
> www.desktop-video-guide.com

How can you recommend the TRV-950 without mentioning it's abysmal low light
performance? I also don't understand how a 4.2-84mm zoom results in "better
quality video" on the GL2. I think it's great that you've gathered together
most of the 3-CCD models on the market on one page, but I think your
1-paragraph reviews are not quite on the mark.


>
>
> "GRL" <GLitwinski@CHARTERMI.NET> wrote in message
news:<10k4lb3s7j7qk07@corp.supernews.com>...
> > Don't kid yourself, the GS200 is nowhere near a TRV900 in quality.
> >
> > Note that the Panasonic DV953 (a 3-CCD model up from the GS200) was
rated
> > mid-pack by Consumer Reports in 11/03 with a lot of 1-CCD cameras,
including
> > Panasonic models above it, including a $500 list Sony Digital8 camera..
> >
> > Not to say it is a bad camera, just unexceptional at its price.
> >
> > - GRL
> >
> > "Jacques Ciana" <jciana@pasdespambluewin.ch> wrote in message
> > news:41111289$1_3@news.bluewin.ch...
> > >
> > > "Your-Nice" <Your-Nice@ntlworld.com> a écrit dans le message news:
> > > r_TPc.1232$qU2.799@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
> > > > are they a lot better, I see Panasonic have a few models out with a
> > leica
> > > > lens.
> > > > thanks
> > > > Rob.
> > > >
> > > > Yes they are better. Just tested the Panasonic NV-GS200 great !
(almost
> > > as good as the old Sony 900 Or Pana MX300), and cheap ! IMHO a best
buy
> > > actually
> > >
> > >