Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (
More info?)
Ok,
Here is where I started. I subscribed to a newletter from
http://www.customflix.com/Index.jsp. In one of the newletters that I
recieved it stated what I mentioned below. The newletter was titled "DVD
Nightmare #5: Twisted Aspect".
Then I followed a link in that newletter to
http://www.adamwilt.com/DV-FAQ-etc.html#widescreen which really added to my
technical curiosity. On that page follow the link to Ben Syverson's Shooting
in Widescreen DV is worth a look for more info.
I'm just trying to ensure that what I do today I won't regret in 10 years.
I'm mostly shooting home movie type stuff but taking it very seriously.
Kinda a new hobby without blowing the bank.
Hope this helps you Jackie?
Cheers,
Tony
"Jackie" <noreply@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:41253DEE.4020304@bigpond.com...
> I would be interested in a 'pointer' to the article you refer to about
this.
>
> Jackie
>
>
> kay & wand wrote:
> > what you've read is true....
> >
> >
> > "Sympatico News" <tt@tt.com> wrote in message
> > news:ud1Vc.22063$ZI1.871528@news20.bellglobal.com...
> >
> >>I have read that the best way to achieve 16:9 is to use a wide lense as
> >>opposed to the 16:9 amamorphic option available with most DV cameras.
They
> >>say you loose image quality when stretching the image in the amamorphic
> >>approach.
> >>
> >>Does anybody have any professional opions on this?
> >>
> >>thanks
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>