Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop,uk.rec.video.digital (More info?)
My p.c. has a Matrox RT.X100 capture card that I use for DV capture from my
camcorder (a Sony TRV30E). You can also use the RT.X100 for composite video
capture, if you're so inclined.
However, the Sony TRV30E has a "pass-through" facility, whereby a composite
video input signal is converted to DV out (or so I thought). This means that
I can use my camcorder as an external converter and capture composite video
to a firewire input on my p.c.
Is there any advantage of using RT.X100 composite video capture over the
above method? Which would give the best quality: capture card or camcorder
"converter"? Has anyone experimented?
When I put this question to Matrox technical support, they replied "Using
your camcorder as an external converter would not be to your advantage
because the analog signal is not converted into DV." Eh? Isn't it converted
into an DV-format 25fps AVI file? If not, what is it converted to then?
Does the RT.X100 convert composite video to DV?
My p.c. has a Matrox RT.X100 capture card that I use for DV capture from my
camcorder (a Sony TRV30E). You can also use the RT.X100 for composite video
capture, if you're so inclined.
However, the Sony TRV30E has a "pass-through" facility, whereby a composite
video input signal is converted to DV out (or so I thought). This means that
I can use my camcorder as an external converter and capture composite video
to a firewire input on my p.c.
Is there any advantage of using RT.X100 composite video capture over the
above method? Which would give the best quality: capture card or camcorder
"converter"? Has anyone experimented?
When I put this question to Matrox technical support, they replied "Using
your camcorder as an external converter would not be to your advantage
because the analog signal is not converted into DV." Eh? Isn't it converted
into an DV-format 25fps AVI file? If not, what is it converted to then?
Does the RT.X100 convert composite video to DV?