Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Has anyone had an experience where when burning over a DVD that has another
video on it does not work correctly? I managed to copy over a another video
on a DVD and it did not look as sharp as if I used a brand new disc. I have
a + RW DVD burner in my computer and I use that type of Disc.
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
leo wrote:
> Has anyone had an experience where when burning over a DVD that has another
> video on it does not work correctly? I managed to copy over a another video
> on a DVD and it did not look as sharp as if I used a brand new disc. I have
> a + RW DVD burner in my computer and I use that type of Disc.
When using a RW disc, the first burn will always be the strongest.
After that, the readibility of the disc will be less than when it was
new. The problems you *might* run into would be skipping, pausing,
severe distortions with macroblocking.
If it plays smoothly but appears more blurry, I'd say that's your
imagination.
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
that is precisely what transpired, but on a copy that played flawlessly, I
did detect a lower clarity than a burn from a new disc. I was using Nero
for the first time and really like it compared to Mydvd and dvdit
"Will Dormann" <wdormann@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:ZeednetMHdvnBK3cRVn-rw@comcast.com...
> leo wrote:
>
> > Has anyone had an experience where when burning over a DVD that has
another
> > video on it does not work correctly? I managed to copy over a another
video
> > on a DVD and it did not look as sharp as if I used a brand new disc. I
have
> > a + RW DVD burner in my computer and I use that type of Disc.
>
> When using a RW disc, the first burn will always be the strongest.
> After that, the readibility of the disc will be less than when it was
> new. The problems you *might* run into would be skipping, pausing,
> severe distortions with macroblocking.
>
> If it plays smoothly but appears more blurry, I'd say that's your
> imagination.
>
>
> -WD
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
leo wrote:
> that is precisely what transpired, but on a copy that played flawlessly, I
> did detect a lower clarity than a burn from a new disc. I was using Nero
> for the first time and really like it compared to Mydvd and dvdit
If you compare a "virgin" burned DVD+RW and one that has been re-written
several times, they should be bit-for-bit identical. Otherwise, it's a
failed burn. You can see this in action by selecting the "Verify after
burn" option. It's comparing the bits written to the disc to the
source bits.
I fail to see how one could look blurrier than the other. Post links to
still frames from both DVDs if you like.
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
I will try to post one soon.
"Will Dormann" <wdormann@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:FZGdndYuwuS1Ta3cRVn-rw@comcast.com...
> leo wrote:
>
> > that is precisely what transpired, but on a copy that played flawlessly,
I
> > did detect a lower clarity than a burn from a new disc. I was using
Nero
> > for the first time and really like it compared to Mydvd and dvdit
>
> If you compare a "virgin" burned DVD+RW and one that has been re-written
> several times, they should be bit-for-bit identical. Otherwise, it's a
> failed burn. You can see this in action by selecting the "Verify after
> burn" option. It's comparing the bits written to the disc to the
> source bits.
>
> I fail to see how one could look blurrier than the other. Post links to
> still frames from both DVDs if you like.
>
>
> -WD
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
You are correct, it is sameO sameO....I must have been blurred
myself....thanks
"Will Dormann" <wdormann@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:FZGdndYuwuS1Ta3cRVn-rw@comcast.com...
> leo wrote:
>
> > that is precisely what transpired, but on a copy that played flawlessly,
I
> > did detect a lower clarity than a burn from a new disc. I was using
Nero
> > for the first time and really like it compared to Mydvd and dvdit
>
> If you compare a "virgin" burned DVD+RW and one that has been re-written
> several times, they should be bit-for-bit identical. Otherwise, it's a
> failed burn. You can see this in action by selecting the "Verify after
> burn" option. It's comparing the bits written to the disc to the
> source bits.
>
> I fail to see how one could look blurrier than the other. Post links to
> still frames from both DVDs if you like.
>
>
> -WD
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:29:58 GMT, "leo" <dusty-roads@earthlink.net>
wrote:
>Has anyone had an experience where when burning over a DVD that has another
>video on it does not work correctly? I managed to copy over a another video
>on a DVD and it did not look as sharp as if I used a brand new disc. I have
>a + RW DVD burner in my computer and I use that type of Disc.
>
>L
>
I bet the orignal DVD is a dual layer disc, and in the process of
converting it to work on one single layer disc, losses have to occur.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.