Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (
More info?)
I see that there is something called Media Center Extender from
LinkSys that only works with Microsoft Media Center PC v5. It is
basically a network media player, and it is getting a good review in
the recent edition of PC Magazine. Currently, another similar network
media player that I know of is not that great according to review in
this newsgroup.
If someone wants to get a network media player along with getting a
new PC, he will be tempted to get the Media Center Extender (like the
one from LinkSys) and a Microsoft Media Center PC v5.
If someone wants to upgrade the O/S on his existing PC anyway, he will
be interested to upgrade the O/S into Microsoft Media Center v5 (I am
under the impression that Microsoft Media Center v5 doesn't have to
come with a PC). Then he can get his option open just in case he wants
to get a Media Center Extender (that only works with Microsoft Media
Center v5).
In my opinion, this Media Center Extender thing is a way Microsoft
uses to tie in everything to force/attract us to buy Microsoft Media
Center v5. If all the new network media players come to the market are
Media Center Extenders and if they all come with attractive features,
we will be hard pressed not to buy a copy of Microsoft Media Center
v5. In other words, the more attractive Media Center Extenders are,
the more likely we will be buying Microsoft Media Center v5.
People like me who has already had an existing PC and is not planning
to change its O/S will not find Microsoft Media Center useful.
Moreover, I want that device to be able to surf internet (and play
some games occasionally), not just watching TV / listening to music /
viewing pictures. I would prefer to get a real PC instead of a network
media player. The price of a real PC is getting cheaper and cheaper,
and the price of a Microsoft Media Center is not really that cheap
(something like $299) (I guess because this product is still new).
Anyway, the cost of establishing a TV-viewing station consists not
only of the cost of the PC/network media player, but also of the cost
of a nice TV. The cost of a nice TV is probably much greater than the
cost of a low-end-PC/network media player. When we add all the dollar
amount together, the price difference between a low-end-PC and a
network media player simply is not big enough. If the low-end PC not
only can show TV programs, but also can surf internet (at low
resolution), I would think that the low-end PC is more attractive than
the network media player. The shortcoming in this line of reasoning is
how well we can use a nice TV to surf internet. If the answer is "this
is OK", PC will come out ahead. If the answer is "this is really
poor", network media player will come out ahead (because surfing
internet will not be a relevant factor).
Thanks for listening.
Jay Chan