Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Remote Desktop inoperarble after in-place upgrade

Last response: in Windows XP
Share
Anonymous
August 31, 2004 1:26:29 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely (More info?)

We have upgraded a number of machines in a domain from
Win2k to XP SP1. The machines function perfectly except
that the Remote desktop tool does not work - the error
is "the local policy of this machine does not allow you to
log in interactively". Other XP machines that have been
built from scratch work fine. We have modified the local
policies on the non-working machines to allow remote
connections, but this makes no difference.

Any help/suggestions would be gratefully received.
Anonymous
August 31, 2004 6:40:53 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely (More info?)

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=windows+2000+xp+upgra...

Check the policy noted in the above google archived thread.

"Rupert Knight" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:12f601c48f77$452db4c0$3a01280a@phx.gbl...
> We have upgraded a number of machines in a domain from
> Win2k to XP SP1. The machines function perfectly except
> that the Remote desktop tool does not work - the error
> is "the local policy of this machine does not allow you to
> log in interactively". Other XP machines that have been
> built from scratch work fine. We have modified the local
> policies on the non-working machines to allow remote
> connections, but this makes no difference.
>
> Any help/suggestions would be gratefully received.
Anonymous
September 1, 2004 4:54:11 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely (More info?)

Bill, Thanks for the link. Problem is sorted. Any idea
whay that policy does not get propogated during the
upgrade ?
>-----Original Message-----
>http://groups.google.com/groups?
q=windows+2000+xp+upgrade+rdp+policy+setting&hl=en&lr=&ie=U
TF-8&c2coff=1&selm=uP4%24nh1GEHA.2844%
40TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl&rnum=1
>
>Check the policy noted in the above google archived
thread.
>
>"Rupert Knight" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
wrote in message
>news:12f601c48f77$452db4c0$3a01280a@phx.gbl...
>> We have upgraded a number of machines in a domain from
>> Win2k to XP SP1. The machines function perfectly except
>> that the Remote desktop tool does not work - the error
>> is "the local policy of this machine does not allow you
to
>> log in interactively". Other XP machines that have been
>> built from scratch work fine. We have modified the local
>> policies on the non-working machines to allow remote
>> connections, but this makes no difference.
>>
>> Any help/suggestions would be gratefully received.
>
>
>.
>
Related resources
Anonymous
September 1, 2004 2:25:14 PM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely (More info?)

Never looked into it, I'm afraid. We've seen one instance of a machine
which apparently was not a Windows 2000 upgrade hitting this issue, but that
was an anomaly.

"Rupert Knight" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:067f01c48ff8$de6b6ca0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> Bill, Thanks for the link. Problem is sorted. Any idea
> whay that policy does not get propogated during the
> upgrade ?
>>-----Original Message-----
>>http://groups.google.com/groups?
> q=windows+2000+xp+upgrade+rdp+policy+setting&hl=en&lr=&ie=U
> TF-8&c2coff=1&selm=uP4%24nh1GEHA.2844%
> 40TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl&rnum=1
>>
>>Check the policy noted in the above google archived
> thread.
>>
>>"Rupert Knight" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
> wrote in message
>>news:12f601c48f77$452db4c0$3a01280a@phx.gbl...
>>> We have upgraded a number of machines in a domain from
>>> Win2k to XP SP1. The machines function perfectly except
>>> that the Remote desktop tool does not work - the error
>>> is "the local policy of this machine does not allow you
> to
>>> log in interactively". Other XP machines that have been
>>> built from scratch work fine. We have modified the local
>>> policies on the non-working machines to allow remote
>>> connections, but this makes no difference.
>>>
>>> Any help/suggestions would be gratefully received.
>>
>>
>>.
>>
Anonymous
September 2, 2004 1:32:55 AM

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.work_remotely (More info?)

New group policy templates are not automatically included when an
upgrade is done...

Jeffrey Randow (Windows Networking & Smart Display MVP)
jeffreyr-support@remotenetworktechnology.com

Please post all responses to the newsgroups for the benefit
of all USENET users. Messages sent via email may or may not
be answered depending on time availability....

Remote Networking Technology Support Site -
http://www.remotenetworktechnology.com
Windows XP Expert Zone - http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone

On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:25:14 -0400, "Bill Sanderson"
<Bill_Sanderson@msn.com.plugh.org> wrote:

>Never looked into it, I'm afraid. We've seen one instance of a machine
>which apparently was not a Windows 2000 upgrade hitting this issue, but that
>was an anomaly.
>
>"Rupert Knight" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>news:067f01c48ff8$de6b6ca0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>> Bill, Thanks for the link. Problem is sorted. Any idea
>> whay that policy does not get propogated during the
>> upgrade ?
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>http://groups.google.com/groups?
>> q=windows+2000+xp+upgrade+rdp+policy+setting&hl=en&lr=&ie=U
>> TF-8&c2coff=1&selm=uP4%24nh1GEHA.2844%
>> 40TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl&rnum=1
>>>
>>>Check the policy noted in the above google archived
>> thread.
>>>
>>>"Rupert Knight" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com>
>> wrote in message
>>>news:12f601c48f77$452db4c0$3a01280a@phx.gbl...
>>>> We have upgraded a number of machines in a domain from
>>>> Win2k to XP SP1. The machines function perfectly except
>>>> that the Remote desktop tool does not work - the error
>>>> is "the local policy of this machine does not allow you
>> to
>>>> log in interactively". Other XP machines that have been
>>>> built from scratch work fine. We have modified the local
>>>> policies on the non-working machines to allow remote
>>>> connections, but this makes no difference.
>>>>
>>>> Any help/suggestions would be gratefully received.
>>>
>>>
>>>.
>>>
>
!