Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless (More info?)
I keep reading stories about how much better infrastructure networks
are than point to point (better at keeping connections, easier to
configure etc). I don't have a broadband connection to share and
don't have a wired network to connect to, but can I get a wireless AP
anyway or will it only work if it is connected to a wired network
somewhere?
NOTE: Please reply to the newsgroup and not directly to me. This allows
others to add to and benefit from these threads and also helps to ensure a
more timely response. Thank you!
This posting is provided "AS IS" without warranty either expressed or
implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of
merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose.
The views and opinions expressed in this newsgroup posting are mine and do
not necessarily express or reflect the views and / or opinions of Microsoft.
******************************************************************************
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless (More info?)
In message <9e58141d.0410220540.660ccf63@posting.google.com>, Sue Swaze
<suswaze@hotmail.com> writes
>I keep reading stories about how much better infrastructure networks
>are than point to point (better at keeping connections, easier to
>configure etc). I don't have a broadband connection to share and
>don't have a wired network to connect to, but can I get a wireless AP
>anyway or will it only work if it is connected to a wired network
>somewhere?
>
No, it doesn't need anything wired. The drawback is that both the
networking and the wireless parameters have to be right for the network
to spring into life.
If you're confident of doing that, go ahead. If not, it's usually easier
to drag all the computers together, connect with cables temporarily, use
the XP Networking wizard to get the machines working together and then
go wireless.
Presumably one of your machines has an Internet connection to be shared,
and will therefore be the network master machine. Run the wizard on this
one, and at the end it will offer to make a floppy which can then be
used to set up the other machines to talk to it.
Most home wireless routers have a few Ethernet ports. If not, ignore it
and connect each other computer to the master in turn using a
*crossover* Ethernet cable, to get all the machines talking.
The wireless part may just work, or may need a little nudging. If so, at
least you're confident that basic networking is OK and it's only the
wireless bit you need to get working.
--
Joe
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless (More info?)
Hi
As a general rule at least one computer should be Wired, otherwise if the
Wireless does not work you would not be able to log and check or change the
settings.
"Joe" <joe@jretrading.com> wrote in message
news:41B57mGZtVeBFw61@jretrading.com...
> In message <9e58141d.0410220540.660ccf63@posting.google.com>, Sue Swaze
> <suswaze@hotmail.com> writes
> >I keep reading stories about how much better infrastructure networks
> >are than point to point (better at keeping connections, easier to
> >configure etc). I don't have a broadband connection to share and
> >don't have a wired network to connect to, but can I get a wireless AP
> >anyway or will it only work if it is connected to a wired network
> >somewhere?
> >
> No, it doesn't need anything wired. The drawback is that both the
> networking and the wireless parameters have to be right for the network
> to spring into life.
>
> If you're confident of doing that, go ahead. If not, it's usually easier
> to drag all the computers together, connect with cables temporarily, use
> the XP Networking wizard to get the machines working together and then
> go wireless.
>
> Presumably one of your machines has an Internet connection to be shared,
> and will therefore be the network master machine. Run the wizard on this
> one, and at the end it will offer to make a floppy which can then be
> used to set up the other machines to talk to it.
>
> Most home wireless routers have a few Ethernet ports. If not, ignore it
> and connect each other computer to the master in turn using a
> *crossover* Ethernet cable, to get all the machines talking.
>
> The wireless part may just work, or may need a little nudging. If so, at
> least you're confident that basic networking is OK and it's only the
> wireless bit you need to get working.
> --
> Joe
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.