Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Ok, can someone else who is well seasoned in Vegas Help me here.
I've done some lengthy full blown projects with Vegas in the last
couple years & I love it!!!
I built a special PC with the best of the best (within reason) just for
my video editing.
BUT
I still can't use Vegas Preview Quality on anything other than Draft.
Sure I can edit with draft mode (going to my offline tv monitor)
But Why even have preview, good & best when they are practially
unusable. They drop so many frames it's like watching a slide show.
I only use them when I pause the movie, switch to best just to see how
sharp my movie actually is or will be when rendered.
I have Pentium 3.0 Ghz 800fsb
1 Gig Corsair Ram
Asus P4P800 Deluxe Mobo
74Gig SATA 10,000 RPM Raptor Drive
(along with 2 other storage drives SATA&PATA)
ATI 9600 AIW Video Card
All I want to know is that is this can't do any better than my old
Duron AMD 800Ghz system. (I hear the preview is all CPU load)
Then what do I need. I understand and accept the fact that frames will
drop and hardware isn't good enough to support say the "Best"
but anything better than draft!
Is there a computer out there that will not drop frames (noticably)
even in "Preview" or "Good" mode???
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Rick wrote:
> Ok, can someone else who is well seasoned in Vegas Help me here.
> I've done some lengthy full blown projects with Vegas in the last
> couple years & I love it!!!
> I built a special PC with the best of the best (within reason) just
> for my video editing.
> BUT
> I still can't use Vegas Preview Quality on anything other than Draft.
> Sure I can edit with draft mode (going to my offline tv monitor)
> But Why even have preview, good & best when they are practially
> unusable. They drop so many frames it's like watching a slide show.
> I only use them when I pause the movie, switch to best just to see how
> sharp my movie actually is or will be when rendered.
>
> I have Pentium 3.0 Ghz 800fsb
> 1 Gig Corsair Ram
> Asus P4P800 Deluxe Mobo
> 74Gig SATA 10,000 RPM Raptor Drive
> (along with 2 other storage drives SATA&PATA)
> ATI 9600 AIW Video Card
>
> All I want to know is that is this can't do any better than my old
> Duron AMD 800Ghz system. (I hear the preview is all CPU load)
> Then what do I need. I understand and accept the fact that frames
> will drop and hardware isn't good enough to support say the "Best"
> but anything better than draft!
> Is there a computer out there that will not drop frames (noticably)
> even in "Preview" or "Good" mode???
>
> Anyone Experienced Know?
Are you trying to run 20 video tracks simultaneously with a lot of effects
applied?
I just loaded up 5 separate video clips, applied Track Motion and Pan/Crop
to each clip, and had no problem getting 30 fps playback in Best(Auto) mode.
I did this on an AMD 2200 at the same time as I was typing this and
downloading a file, a definite no-no under normal circumstances. The point
is that I can do it with a machine with far less performance than yours. My
first thought is that there must be something going on that you're not
mentioning or that you've completely overlooked.
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Wow!
Do you think this has anything to do with it.
I'm not viewing it in the little monitor preview window.
I'm using a firewire to a CANOPUS AVDC100 Digital/Analog converter and
displaying it on a seperate TV Monitor.
I could turn the sofware monitor back on and see what it looks like
there, but if my memory serves me,
there wan't much difference.
Oh Yeah and to answer your question, No, at most I may have 3 video
clips channels stacked for a cool effect or something but usually it's
one video channel & one audio channel.
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
>From past experience, that 9600 card was kind of a blemish on the ATI
family of cards. I had nothing but problems with mine while doing video
and gaming. My best advice would be to look into a 9800 or one of the
FireGL's if you can afford it.
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Is the "Recompress edited frames" enabled? It's under Options -
Preferences - Video Device.
Mike
Rick wrote:
> Wow!
> Do you think this has anything to do with it.
> I'm not viewing it in the little monitor preview window.
> I'm using a firewire to a CANOPUS AVDC100 Digital/Analog converter and
> displaying it on a seperate TV Monitor.
> I could turn the sofware monitor back on and see what it looks like
> there, but if my memory serves me,
> there wan't much difference.
> Oh Yeah and to answer your question, No, at most I may have 3 video
> clips channels stacked for a cool effect or something but usually it's
> one video channel & one audio channel.
>
> > Rick
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Well it is checked.
If I uncheck it, then nothing gets sent to the monitor.
Any other Ideas? I just can't believe that people are actually using
"Best" Full with an external monitor.
There must be a setting or license or something not right with my vegas
software I believe.
Because the computer is fast on everything else, and benchmark programs
give it real high scores.
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Rick wrote:
> Well it is checked.
> If I uncheck it, then nothing gets sent to the monitor.
> Any other Ideas? I just can't believe that people are actually using
> "Best" Full with an external monitor.
> There must be a setting or license or something not right with my
> vegas software I believe.
> Because the computer is fast on everything else, and benchmark
> programs give it real high scores.
>
> Again, any other ideas of what it could be?
I'll check the settings on my Vegas suite at the office tomorrow as I don't
have an external monitor here at home. I'll get back to you (very late)
tomorrow night.
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Thanks Mike.
If this helps the diagnosis, The slow preview looks the same in both
the on-screen preview and the firewire
connected monitor. both look like a slide show in "best" mode. and a
little faster slide show in Preview mode.
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Rick wrote:
> Thanks Mike.
> If this helps the diagnosis, The slow preview looks the same in both
> the on-screen preview and the firewire
> connected monitor. both look like a slide show in "best" mode. and a
> little faster slide show in Preview mode.
There's definitely something weird going on with your system. A computer as
fast as yours should be flying though a preview. Is your email address
valid if I send you an email from work on Thursday?
In the meantime, you may want to try a post to the Sony Vegas forum at
http://mediasoftware.sonypictures. [...] mID=4&ms=1 There are a number of folks a lot more knowledgeable about Vegas than I am
who will have suggestions I haven't thought of.
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Thank you very much.
I'll post there and see what I find.
also, Maybe there is something going on with my video card.
(I've never been happy with it, it comes with a video capture
capability
and it is so macrovision sensitive that even my old home movies, that I
try
to digitize are seen as copywritten material and give the typical
macrovision
color/darkness imaging garbage)
PS my email is correct.
Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (More info?)
Your video card really shouldn't have anything to do with it. I finally got
around to trying it at the office (P4, 3.4Ghz, 1.5 gig of RAM) and, while I
can't get full frame playback unless I do a ram render, it's definitely not
as slow as what you're getting. I hope the Sony forum has some answers for
you. Sorry :-(
Mike
Rick wrote:
> Thank you very much.
> I'll post there and see what I find.
>
> also, Maybe there is something going on with my video card.
> (I've never been happy with it, it comes with a video capture
> capability
> and it is so macrovision sensitive that even my old home movies, that
> I try
> to digitize are seen as copywritten material and give the typical
> macrovision
> color/darkness imaging garbage)
> PS my email is correct.
>
> Thanks,
> I'll post my findings.
> Rick
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.