Archived from groups: rec.video.desktop (
More info?)
Clive Savage <clive@milllom.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2005 04:33:04 -0800, LR6.37.88@gmail.com wrote:
> >Divx now is nothing like Divx before. Only the name is the same. It has
> >nothing to do with the old Divx except for the name. The current Divx
> >is a video compression codec that is similar to mpeg4. Go to divx.com
> >for more information on this codec.
> >
> >You can create Divx videos on your pc and save them do a DVD. The
> >advantages over standard Mpeg2 DVD format is that the Divx codec has
> >better compression, so you can fit more videos on single DVD at the
> >same quality.
> >
> How far can I compress a 4Gb video/dvd file before I see any reduction
> in quality (keeping the standard DVD resolution)?
> Is bitrate in Divx the same as in mpeg?
> Using the Dr. divx software.
> Bye for now.
> Clive.
I've been experimenting with Dr Divx, AutoGK and FairUse using both the Divx5
and XVID codecs.
I encode stuff to watch on my Phillips DVP642 player. It probably makes a huge
difference whether you're going to be watching your output on a progressive
non-interlaced display or not. I watch on regular old-fashioned set.
Everything looks a Lot better on my (very heavy) 21" CRT Monitor.
There seem to be ways to get the bit rate down to around 1500 while keeping
highish resolution and still produce a great picture. I've picked-up some Brit
files that were created (as Gspot tells me) with VirtualDub using XVID that
look amazing. I'm thinking of 'Spooks' (a so-so show) current season, and 'The
Hustle' (Great Show!) from a year or two ago. Filesizes for those 1 hour shows
were around 650 or 700 meg.
I've tried to recreate that quality with the same bitrate but can't. I can
come close, but not close enough. So far, juggling resolution/bitrate I'm
around the 1:2 mark. Still learning, experimenting. Cryptic secrets elude me
still, apparently.
Quality of source seems to be enormously important. Analogue cable from my
PVR-250 doesn't yeild particularly spectacular results. Encoding directly from
dvd produces much better results, but again not *quite* as good as the files
I've mentioned above. My aim is to equal those files.
So I'm guessing that a 3:1 compression ratio - to pretty-much keep the
original quality - is probably possible, but I'm far from being able to do
that. The automatic settings in the programs I'm using certainly don't do it
and my tweakings have yielded only partial success. And yes, I'm not easy to
please.
Any tips are very welcome. Nex